User talk:Dakota.reeves18

June 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Hayman30. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Two Is Better Than One— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hayman30 (talk) 12:43, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dakota.reeves18, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Dakota.reeves18! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:02, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Recent edits to Floored[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Floored, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 07:40, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017[edit]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes such as ones made to The Only Exception, Decode (song), Sk8er Boi and many more have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies and have been reverted. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Bowling is life (talk) 23:41, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kellymoat (talk) 18:58, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at I Don't Want to Miss a Thing, you may be blocked from editing. SummerPhD^v2.0 17:57, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Sk8er Boi. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 01:36, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Huon (talk) 22:29, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Hayman30. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Macarena (song)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hayman30 (talk) 14:34, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. 183.171.182.176 (talk) 17:07, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You've already received a block for unsourced additions and changing genre without a source, and you have not stopped since that first block, so you are blocked again, this time for 1 week. Stop tinkering with genre without providing a source to back it up. (For example, with this edit here. You removed a genre that was sourced and added a new one which was not represented in the source. This is not acceptable.)

Stop doing this. Wikipedia strongly frowns upon people who go around tinkering with music genre according to their own subjective tastes. You need to back your changes with sources. See WP:REFB if you need help with this. But no more unsourced changes to music genre, or you'll keep getting blocked.

On a side note, unrelated to your block, but please be more careful when you reword sentences too. You've made this edit twice now, and it reads terribly. Read it out loud to yourself. It sounds completely broken. Sergecross73 msg me 18:35, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 115.164.223.127 (talk) 12:39, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at All That She Wants, you may be blocked from editing. Traveltoromantis (talk) 16:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 18:35, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some things I've noticed[edit]

I've noticed that you have been replacing flatlists or hlists with dots and I want to know why. Flatlists and hlists generate dots on their own. Please stop. I've also noticed that you have been rewording sentences without an explanation. Try to explain why you are rewording sentences. Thank you. Bowling is life (talk) 18:46, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did again at All That She Wants, you may be blocked from editing. Traveltoromantis (talk) 04:30, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop with your disruptive editing. If you continue to change/add genres such as you did at Bartender Song (Sittin' at a Bar) without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing. Also please stop replacing flatlists and/or hlists with dots such as you did at Need You Now (Lady Antebellum song). It's pointless and disruptive. Bowling is life (talk) 18:18, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources. Traveltoromantis (talk) 15:56, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 16:09, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]