User talk:Dank/Archive 17

Archive 10

←

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

Archive 18

Archive 19

Archive 20

Chicago style question

Hey Dank, what is the proper way in Chicago to handle citations like this? (the Conway's ref) Should I split the references into Preston and Schenia? I know that I'm missing page numbers for the chapters still, but aside from that, I'm not sure if this is the correct way to cite this. Thanks, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 18:58, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

It's 15.1 - 15.19; nothing in there specifically says not to do that, except the general instructions to list each entry with the author's name first, which I think probably means not to do what you're doing there. - Dank (push to talk) 00:03, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll split them then. Do I need to give a full citation for the book both times? Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 02:12, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

I think so, yes. - Dank (push to talk) 02:14, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Iowa class battleship

The A-Class review for Iowa class battleship is now open, and any input there would be appreciated! Thanks! WikiCopter (radio • sorties • images • lost • defense • attack) 01:05, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 October newsletter

The 2010 WikiCup is over! It has been a long journey, but what has been achieved is impressive: combined, participants have produced over seventy featured articles, over five hundred good articles, over fifty featured lists, over one thousand one hundred "did you know" entries, in addition to various other pieces of recognised content. A full list (which has yet to be updated to reflect the scores in the final round) can be found here. Perhaps more importantly, we have our winner! The 2010 WikiCup champion is Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), with an unbelievable 4220 points in the final round. Second place goes to TonyTheTiger (submissions), with 2260, and third to Casliber (submissions), with 560. Congratulations to our other four finalists – White Shadows (submissions), William S. Saturn (submissions), Staxringold (submissions) and ThinkBlue (submissions). Also, congratulations to Sasata (submissions), who withdrew from the competition with an impressive 2685 points earlier in this round.

Prizes will also be going to those who claimed the most points for different types of content in a single round. It was decided that the prizes would be awarded for those with the highest in a round, rather than overall, so that the finalists did not have an unfair advantage. Winning the featured article prize is Casliber (submissions), for five featured articles in round 4. Winning the good article prize is Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), for eighty-one good articles in round 5. Winning the featured list prize is Staxringold (submissions), for six featured lists in round 1. Winning the picture and sound award is Jujutacular (submissions), for four featured pictures in round 3. Winning the topic award is Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), for forty-seven articles in various good topics in round 5. Winning the "did you know" award is TonyTheTiger (submissions), for over one hundred did you knows is round 5. Finally, winning the in the news award is Candlewicke (submissions), for nineteen articles in the news in round three.

The WikiCup has faced criticism in the last month – hopefully, we will take something positive from it and create a better contest for next year. Like Wikipedia itself, the Cup is a work in progress, and ideas for how it should work are more than welcome on the WikiCup talk page and on the scoring talk page. Also, people are more than welcome to sign up for next year's competition on the signup page. Well done and thank you to everyone involved – the Cup has been a pleasure to run, and we, as judges, have been proud to be a part of it. We hope that next year, however the Cup is working, and whoever is running it, it will be back, stronger and more popular than ever. Until then, goodbye and happy editing! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 03:04, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

It's raining thanks spam!

• Please pardon the intrusion. This tin of thanks spam is offered to everyone who commented or !voted (Support, Oppose or Neutral) on my recent RfA. I appreciate the fact that you care enough about the encyclopedia and its community to participate in this forum.
• There are a host of processes that further need community support, including content review (WP:GAN, WP:PR, WP:FAC, and WP:FAR). You can also consider becoming a Wikipedia Ambassador. If you have the requisite experience and knowledge, consider running for admin yourself!
• If you have any further comments, input or questions, please do feel free to drop a line to me on my talk page. I am open to all discussion. Thanks • Ling.Nut (talk) 02:19, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
• Tks for your kind words on my talk page. Cheers!• Ling.Nut (talk) 08:20, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

  Anytime. - Dank (push to talk) 14:00, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Copyediting

Since you like to copyedit, I thought you might be interested in this. WikiCopter (radio • sorties • images • lost • defense • attack) 04:40, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

No, thanks. - Dank (push to talk) 04:44, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

I've dealt with the other concerns raised at the ACR you commented at, could you now complete copyedits? WikiCopter (radio • sorties • images • lost • defense • attack) 21:11, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

I do copyediting at ACR when an article seems to me to be approaching its final version. Since there are currently two opposes that are suggesting the article needs to be expanded with material from a wider range of sources, it's not time to copyedit it yet. - Dank (push to talk) 21:39, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Could you then take a look at something quite far from naval matters? Opto-isolator has been copy-edited, but (a nod to your recent bit of wisdom at WT:SHIPS) there are still eight buts remaining, two in the lead. I'm not sure if passages like "They contain a single physical isolation barrier, but provide protection equivalent to double isolation." are acceptable or not (the sentence is a paraphrase of the source: "Reinforced isolation is a single isolation system that provides protection equivalent to double insulation... reinforced isolation ... is provided only by [them]". [1]) East of Borschov 07:57, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

I've just started trying to cover every MILHIST A-class review; the only way I can do that is not to spend time on copyediting outside MILHIST. Sorry. Yes, Chicago 5.206 frowns on that but. - Dank (push to talk) 13:13, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Battle of Magersfontein

Thank you for taking the time to review this article. Please let us know if you have any further concerns, otherwise could you please indicate if you support or oppose the article's promotion. Socrates2008 (Talk) 11:07, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

GOCE elections

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Elections are currently underway for our inaugural Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days: 00:01 UTC, Friday 1 December – 23:59 UTC, Tuesday 14 December. All GOCE members in good standing, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. There are six candidates vying for four positions. The candidate with the highest number of votes will become the Lead Coordinator, therefore, your vote really matters! Cast your vote today.

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors via SMasters using AWB on 01:33, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Borodino class battlecruiser

This article is undergoing FA review. I did a copy edit of the article but the reveiwer is not satisfied with the result. I was wondering if you could do a round of copy edits, if you have the time? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. --Diannaa ^(Talk) 20:33, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I don't even have time to do all the MILHIST A-class copyediting and reviewing any more, and the workload at FAC is heavier than the workload at A-class. - Dank (push to talk) 23:12, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Ok, thanks anyway. --Diannaa ^(Talk) 01:54, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Hōshō

It appears that we have addressed your concerns at the review page. Cla68 (talk) 07:52, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Asking for a comment in a Move Page request

Hello there! There is an article called "Argentina-Brazil War", it's about an international conflict that occurred between 1825 and 1828 between the Empire of Brazil and the United Provinces of South America over the possession of the Brazilian province of Cisplatina (which had a mixed Portuguese and Spanish population). The problem is that is was never called "Argentina-Brazil War". An editor probably created this name for it.

Thus, I proposed the name to be changed for "Cisplatine War" because it is "the name which is most commonly used to refer to the subject of the article in English-language reliable sources" (WP:COMMONNAME). A few examples: [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], etc...

Your comment in Talk:Argentina–Brazil War#Requested move would be very welcome! Kind regards, --Lecen (talk) 21:48, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

You input is formally requested

Your name came up here as a result of information you left on the Iowa class battleship talk page which I subsequently cited for the newer version of the article. When you get a moment, would you please drop by and help answer the questions left by bahamut0013 (talk · contribs)? I would appreciate it. TomStar81 (Talk) 22:16, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Replied there. - Dank (push to talk) 22:57, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

SMS ship names

Hello
I raised a query with Parsecboy after an exchange of edits at SMS Konig (and some others) (see here) and he suggested I ask you.
Can you remember where the FAC discussion is that covers this? Or, if it was your idea, can you tell me your rationale? Xyl 54 (talk) 14:41, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

We had objections to every way we tried to do it, until we did it this way, and then we had a long string of FACs where no one objected. I believe the thinking was: most readers don't click on most links, even when they should, so linking the explanation would mean that most readers won't even know what the first sentence of the article means. - Dank (push to talk) 14:50, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Mustang Maniacs Page

Hello! I was planning on creating a Wikipedia page for my college's student spirit group, the Mustang Maniacs, but it looks like someone in May 2009 tried to create a page and it was deleted due to, what it looks like, lack of sources and lack of Google hits. A lot has changed in the year and a half since the last article and Cal Poly San Luis Obispo's Mustang Maniacs have six of the ten top hits in Google as well as a page being created for the Golden Horseshoe rivalry trophy, a DI FCS football trophy passed between Cal Poly San Luis Obispo and UC Davis, taken care of by Cal Poly's Mustang Maniacs and their rival group, UC Davis's Aggie Pack (who have a page). The protection and restoration of the Cal Poly P, a landmark of San Luis Obispo county and a nationally recognized historical place, is also taken care of by the Mustang Maniacs as well as more common activities with Cal Poly Athletics, such as lighting the P the Friday before and the Saturday right after a home football game, taking care of Cal Poly's mascot Musty the Mustang, and being the official student section at all Cal Poly athletic events, including football and basketball. The Mustang Maniacs also work Cal Poly's Alumni Association, providing an important link between athletics and alumni. The Mustang Maniacs do a lot of work for the university and I would love the chance to create a page for the organization. The page will also link / contribute to Battle for the Golden Horseshoe, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, Cal Poly Mustangs football, Aggie Pack, and the The Cal Poly "P" as well as have sources from the Mustang Daily, San Luis Obispo Tribune, the Aggie Pack website, and Cal Poly Athletic's official website. MustaMustang (talk) 23:37, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

I recommend Wikipedia:Articles for creation. - Dank (push to talk) 01:52, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Diannaa ^(Talk) has given you a Christmas tree! Christmas trees promote WikiLove and are a great way to spread holiday cheer. Merry Christmas!

Spread the WikiLove by adding {{subst:User:The Utahraptor/Christmas tree}} to any editor's talk page with a friendly message.

GOCE Year-end Report

Season's Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors We have reached the end of the year, and what a year it has been! The Guild of Copy Editors was full of activity, and we achieved numerous important milestones in 2010. Read all about these in the Guild's 2010 Year-End Report. Highlights Membership grows to 503 editors 2,589 articles removed through four Backlog elimination drives Our encounter with Jimbo Wales Guild home pages reorganized and redesigned Report on our inaugural elections Guild Plans for 2011 New barnstars introduced Requests page improved Sign up for the January 2011 Backlog elimination drive! Get your copy of the Guild's 2010 Year-End Report here On behalf of the Guild, we take this opportunity to wish you Season's Greetings and Happy New Year. See you in 2011! – Your Coordinators: S Masters (lead), Diannaa, The Utahraptor, and Tea with toast.

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:13, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Hogmanay greeting

Thank you very much for working with me in 2010 to make the encyclopedia a better place. Regardless of any disagreements we may have had, I want to wish you all the very best for 2011. I look forward to working with you, and I hope for health and happiness to you and your family in the year to come. I therefore send you this glass of the cratur, so you can celebrate, whether it is Hogmanay or New Year's Day where you are. Warmest regards, --John (talk) 04:58, 1 January 2011 (UTC)