User talk:DarthBob

December 2019

A page you created has been nominated for deletion because it is a biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone and has unsourced content, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create articles about living people that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative, unreferenced biographies of living people, along with attack pages, are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy may be blocked from editing. L1amw90 (talk) 13:38, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me which page that I created is entirely in negative tone or attacking someone? I have no idea which page that could be, I have never attacked or written anything badly here on Wikipedia. DarthBob (talk) 20:40, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm really sorry about that. I had no idea it was requested as an attack page. I was trying to request the page for deletion, as it had no references etc. But it's been sorted by an administrator. So sorry about that. (the page was Matt Campbell (darts player). L1amw90 (talk) 23:50, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I have realized it is the Matt Campbell's page. I have added some resources, if it is needed, I can find more. It is okay, I was just really surprised, that a page of mine would be considered "attacking someone". That would definitely never be my intention. :-) DarthBob (talk) 23:58, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Vítězslav Sedlák

Hello, DarthBob,

Thank you for creating Vítězslav Sedlák.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Abishe}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Abishe (talk) 18:16, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

HI, thanks for your contributions. Please not that on en.WP we normally don't link common terms, years, or dates. Thanks. Tony (talk) 09:33, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photo credit

Hi, you've claimed File:Daniel Barbořák.jpg as your own work. Could you please clarify how you came by this photo, and if you have any connection to Daniel Barbořák? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I created profiles for all players in Tipsport Premier League, because I was helping the founder of the league. All these photos were sent to me by players (including Daniel Barbořák) themselves and they agreed with publishing them on Wikipedia. If needed, I can provide Facebook contact to Daniel Barbořák and I am sure he will confirm that. --DarthBob (talk) 10:58, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain the nature of the help you were providing? It sounds like you may have a conflict of interest, in which case you need to disclose this relationship on both your user page and the talk pages of affected articles. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:59, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of conflict of interest are you talking about? Seriously? I created pages for darts players, because they played Tipsport Premier League, an organized tournament that was broadcasted in other countries, and they agreed to send me photos. Nobody had anything against it and now suddenly after 3 months I am being accused? --DarthBob (talk) 19:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your explanation that you asked them for the photos and they complied is a sufficient explanation (although it does imply that you filled out the photo's summary of rights incorrectly; please correct the information to accurately reflect Tipssport's ownership and release of the photo). This is being brought to your attention now because the new pages review process has a roughly 3-month-long backlog. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:14, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All right, thanks for the explanation, I did not know that, I will try to change this. --DarthBob (talk) 19:19, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daniel Barbořák

The article Daniel Barbořák has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet either WP:NATHLETE or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alexander Mašek

The article Alexander Mašek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet either WP:NATHLETE nor WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Písek

The article David Písek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Meets neither WP:NATHLETE nor WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ondřej Kysilka

The article Ondřej Kysilka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet either WP:GNG or WP:NATHLETE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:39, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michal Šmejda

The article Michal Šmejda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Meets neither WP:GNG nor WP:NATHLETE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:52, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jason Heaver

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jason Heaver requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Heaver. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jason Heaver

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jason Heaver requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Heaver. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 22:29, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Jason Heaver

Hello, DarthBob,

Thank you for creating Jason Heaver.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references in order to provide significant coverage for this article. See WP:SIGCOV
References that have scores, lists, order of merit and video do not pass as reliable sources for WP:NSPORT. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - you may wish to read WP:NSPORT ) To meet notability requirements, one more reference with significant coverage will suffice. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 21:09, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jason Heaver for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason Heaver is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Heaver (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:30, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Dave Chisnall

added a link pointing to 2017 German Darts Masters

Dimitri Van den Bergh

added a link pointing to 2017 German Darts Masters

Dirk van Duijvenbode

added a link pointing to 2017 German Darts Masters

Gerwyn Price

added a link pointing to 2017 German Darts Masters

James Wade

added a link pointing to 2017 German Darts Masters

Joe Cullen (darts player)

added a link pointing to 2017 German Darts Masters

Jonny Clayton

added a link pointing to 2017 German Darts Masters

Krzysztof Ratajski

added a link pointing to 2017 German Darts Masters

Mervyn King (darts player)

added a link pointing to 2017 German Darts Masters

Michael Smith (darts player)

added a link pointing to 2017 German Darts Masters

Michael van Gerwen

added a link pointing to 2017 German Darts Masters

Nathan Aspinall

added a link pointing to 2017 German Darts Masters

Peter Wright (darts player)

added a link pointing to 2017 German Darts Masters

Rob Cross (darts player)

added a link pointing to 2017 German Darts Masters

Ryan Searle (darts player)

added a link pointing to 2017 German Darts Masters

Stephen Bunting

added a link pointing to 2017 German Darts Masters

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Simon Whitlock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2017 German Darts Masters.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Rosí for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Rosí is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Rosí until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 20:42, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jelle Klaasen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dutch Open.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:2023 International Darts Open

I have deleted 2023 International Darts Open because it was deleted as the result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 International Darts Open. It was been restored as a draft at Draft:2023 International Darts Open, feel free to help improve the draft so that it can be submitted via the WP:AFC process, but consensus was that the article in its current state is not suitable for mainspace at this time. - Aoidh (talk) 23:09, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How is it not suitable, and other 99 tournaments of European Tour were? I do not understand your approach at all. The page is the same as all other pages about darts. People are working on it in their spare time, trying to improve and you just delete it for absolutely no reason. DarthBob (talk) 23:11, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted because consensus at AfD determined that it did not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. That is the reason. As I said, you are welcome to improve the draft and submit it via WP:AFC once the notability issues have been addressed. Please also note that you cannot copy and paste the draft into mainspace without proper attribution; see Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources#How about copying from one Wikipedia article to another? - Aoidh (talk) 23:15, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But how is it possible that all other articles had no problems and this one specifically did? 10 years we create page for every tournament of European Tour and there were NEVER any problems. Can you please look at it in some empathic approach and not via some guidelines? It is just because someone marked it for deletion and then you "decided" to delete. The tournament was also missing elsewhere, so now it seems like it does not even exist. This is just total nonsense. DarthBob (talk) 23:19, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just at a quick glance I'm seeing half a dozen similar articles that had notability concerns that resulted in deletion (example), so it's not just this one specifically. The solution to the notability issue would be to improve the sourcing in the draft so that notability is shown and it can be submitted to WP:AFC. - Aoidh (talk) 23:33, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added multiple sources, I believe that is what was missing comparing to other tournaments. I submitted it as a draft then. I believe it should meet the neccesary criteria now. DarthBob (talk) 23:56, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah but these are different tournaments, I definitely do not want to argue, but there are honestly 99 tournaments of European Tour without a single issue, just now someone decided to mark this one, and it was deleted. I agree now it lacked better sourcing, did not see it at the first glance. So I added sources according to other similar pages that had no issues, I truly believe this page should be here. DarthBob (talk) 00:02, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

how are these individual events notable on their own? These are all a part of a larger tour, which feels notable, but three publications reporting that someone won that event doesn't really fit the bill. The rest of the citations are primary or hardly push towards notability. As noted in the AfD, a well written article that covered the tour as a whole each year would be much better. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many articles on Wikipedia are part of a larger tour, there are articles about tennis tournaments, F1, motorcycle races, I see you cover snooker. Everywhere there is a separate article for each tournament. I do not know what exactly is the threshold, that makes the event "notable". There are articles in the news, it does not describe every single throw of course, but sums up the tournament and most importantly, who won. It is broadcasted on TV, on streams, thousands of people watch it. I honestly do not see how it is different from for example snooker tournament. How is for example this article better or different (2018 Northern Ireland Open)? How is this better: 2022 Herculis, 2022 Athletissima? DarthBob (talk) 13:10, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you asked. It's not about the sources used in the article, it's about it being notable. You can see from the following year's event 2019 Northern Ireland Open, that there's plenty of media covering the event as a whole (See Eurosport, BBC, SportingLife, Sky Sports, etc); rather than a couple of media outposts commenting on the winner. From my area, the difference is between having articles like: Q School 2020 – Event 1 etc, and having an article covering all of these events, that is clearly notable (like at 2019 Q School). We can't look around and say "that other thing is probably not notable, so my non-independently notable item should also exist", we should instead try and make well written articles about notable concepts. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:17, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But there are sources for darts and European Tour also on SportingLife ([1]https://www.sportinglife.com/darts/news/darts-results-gerwyn-price-wins-european-darts-open-to-claim-his-seventh-title-on-the-european-tour/208298 or Sky Sports ([2]https://www.skysports.com/darts/news/12288/12722845/european-tour-darts-damon-heta-defeats-peter-wright-for-victory-in-gibraltar) and I even added those sources. Maybe they do not cover it match by match, because the schedule in darts is very fast, so they sum it up at the end...but it does not mean that the tournament is less notable. DarthBob (talk) 13:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to understand your point, I just still do not get, why these pages started to be a problem after 10 years. European Tour started in 2012 and since then each tournament had his own page, that means that throughout all player's profiles there are links to at least 100 tournaments. If all separate pages are deleted, it will create just one big chaos everywhere. If someone said after 3 tournaments of the series "look, it is not good idea to have it separately, merge it together", I would not have a problem with it. If the articles were constantly flagged for deletion from the beginning, I would not have a problem with it, we could discuss and solve it. But I see this as a big step back, instead of better coverage of this sport (and I really think it is well maintained), we should be deleting articles. And as I wrote somewhere else, I personally know darts commentators and journalists, who use these pages during their work, because they are reliable and updated. I know it is not the best argument, but I just do not understand why to suddenly change something, which is working very well and which was never questioned in the past. DarthBob (talk) 13:40, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Something being done for a long time doesn't mean we have to continue doing it. We don't have articles to cater to dart subject matter fans specifically. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Something being done for a long time doesn't mean we have to continue doing it." So you are saying let's just throw away everything that has been done in the past 10 years. What do you suggest then? Delete everything all together? Or start deleting from now? Because either way does not make sense at all. Either we create a mess in profiles of hundreds of players by deleting all the links and mentions of these tournaments, or it will look ridiculously weird, that suddenly tournaments do not have their own page starting April 2023. DarthBob (talk) 16:29, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DarthBob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 85.160.61.80. This is my personal WiFi at home, so far there was no issue, suddenly I was blocked for no apparent reason. DarthBob (talk) 17:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Obviously, as this account is not blocked, I don't need to unblock it (and you could probably edit from a different IP). As for your home WiFi's IP ... it's probably not your fault, just some bad choice by your provider. Best thing you can do is go to WP:IPECPROXY and follow those instructions to request IP block exemption so this isn't a problem again. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:44, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AfC notification: Draft:2023 International Darts Open has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2023 International Darts Open. Thanks! Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 International Darts Open has been accepted

2023 International Darts Open, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 18:37, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dylan Slevin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dylan Slevin. Thanks! SportingFlyer T·C 02:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dylan Slevin has been accepted

Dylan Slevin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SportingFlyer T·C 07:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 Hungarian Darts Trophy has been accepted

2023 Hungarian Darts Trophy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 10:42, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 Poland Darts Masters has been accepted

2023 Poland Darts Masters, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:36, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Damian Mol for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Damian Mol, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damian Mol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Owen Bates has been accepted

Owen Bates, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:05, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nick Fullwell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Fullwell, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Fullwell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Luc Peters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luc Peters, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luc Peters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jamie Clark (darts player) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jamie Clark (darts player), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Clark (darts player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]