User talk:Digiwrld1

Archives: User talk:Digiwrld1/Archive1

Regional List of Wii games

Can't we just put the list of Wii games in each region? (ex: List of Wii games (North America)). Not all Wii games are going to be released worldwide. Versus22 (talk) 04:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...And the table is getting way too long! (Reply to my talk page). Versus22 (talk) 04:12, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

However, The List of Virtual Console games gets sorted into regional articles. (and it's all updated right now)! Versus22 (talk) 22:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the games in different regions, I would just put them that have some sort of release date into these regional articles. The games that have TBA or the silver word "Unreleased" should NOT go in. Versus22 (talk) 22:29, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We'll have to need some Japanese & Europe users (if there are any) that know how to type in English to help work with those regions as well. Versus22 (talk) 22:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I see now what you mean about "Unreleased" & TBA. I thought they meant the same thing. (See Talk:List of WiiWare games). Yeah, or maybe it could in that matter (article). I did this on that article because I was tired of seeing TBA on that article. Versus22 (talk) 22:46, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just copy & paste some of the information from List of Wii games. (I did the "A" games for North America). I'll be updating it more when I have time which is next weekend, or at lunch somedays. (I go to school). Versus22 (talk) 01:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another question. Doesn't all the Nintendo regional sites also have the release date calendar? I know the US one does. Versus22 (talk) 14:52, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

I'm losing 3-0! =( 70.69.178.89 (talk) 00:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC) (from Versus22)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CocotoCarniival.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CocotoCarniival.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:32, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Baja Destruction.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Baja Destruction.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ferrari Challenge (video game)

I have nominated Ferrari Challenge (video game), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferrari Challenge (video game). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Guy (Help!) 21:19, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Puzzle Balls

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Puzzle Balls, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MuZemike (talk) 23:53, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Hail to the Chimp

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Hail to the Chimp, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Scjessey (talk) 16:36, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Broadsword Interactive

I have nominated Broadsword Interactive, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broadsword Interactive. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 22:45, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:CrashDummy.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CrashDummy.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:13, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WC24

Template:WC24 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:16, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Starblaze: Ultimate Battle

The article Starblaze: Ultimate Battle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence game ever came out, no reliable sources, not much in google. WP:CRYSTAL at best.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret ^account 23:36, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Crayon Shin-chan: Saikyou Kazoku Kasukabe King Wii, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Crayon Shin-chan: Saikyou Kazoku Kasukabe King Wii" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 00:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CosmicFamily.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CosmicFamily.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Baja Destruction

The article Baja Destruction has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:34, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Baja Mania for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baja Mania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baja Mania until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:31, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Crash Dummy vs The Evil D-Troit for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crash Dummy vs The Evil D-Troit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crash Dummy vs The Evil D-Troit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:47, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ready Set Word for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ready Set Word is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ready Set Word until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SITH (talk) 11:36, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Impossible Mission (2007 game)

The article Impossible Mission (2007 game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable game. Zero reviews located on Metacritic or anywhere else.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:32, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Nintendo-Asia.png

The file File:Nintendo-Asia.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]