User talk:Drjoseph7
Cloud computing[edit]
I see you're trying to add references to some academic conference proceedings. I know it's confusing, but the article uses inline citations. This means that you should add the content, wrapped in <ref> </ref> tags, in the portion of the article you think the references apply to. Thanks, and welcome. Steven Walling • talk 07:24, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Drjoseph7, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]
|
Hi Drjoseph7! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 02:29, 8 October 2012 (UTC) |
October 2012[edit]
Hello, Drjoseph7. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 11:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Jprg1966 (talk) 04:42, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fr. Biju John PhD.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 16:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
November 2012[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 14:23, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Cloud computing, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jojalozzo 16:26, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 17:49, 1 November 2012 (UTC)Drjoseph7 response[edit]
(I moved the following from it's initial location to this new section and added the user's signature. Jojalozzo 16:05, 2 November 2012 (UTC))
This is about semantic cloud computing. In April 2012, Dr. Biju John and Dr. Souheil Khaddaj, Kingston University defined the semantic concept of cloud [22] based on enterprise computing as "Cloud computing is a universal collection of data which extends over the internet in the form of resources [23][24] (such as information hardware, various platforms, services etc.) and forms individual units within the virtualization environment. Held together by infrastructure providers, service providers and the consumer, then it is semantically accessed by various users.”[25]. Based on this defenition there are various studies are going on particularly research work at Kingston University, Gandhi university etc. There are various International conferences are conducted on this work however this contributin is deleted by saying non-historic and self promotion. It is defined in a conference, since then scientific communities are discussing on it. If you don't like their names please avoid the names, but you cannot hide the research work.
Users involved
Drjoseph7,
Resolving the dispute
Other steps if any, you have tried to resolve this dispute
I have been editing frequently, but deleted my contributions and blocked my IP address which is rude.
How you think we can help resolve the dispute?
The referenced work should be displayed and rather deleting the work, try to add or modify the content after researching on it properly. Please also consider wiki administers qualifications and experience, if they are not true researchers, please don't permit them to delete the non-expertise areas. Above all blocking the IP address is too rude. My work never violated the wiki rules such as self promotion. I am not promoting myself, but pointing out a true research. It opened up new discussions on semantic cloud computing. My work is historic, because I personally attend several conferences on Semantic cloud computing. Which are historically taking place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drjoseph7 (talk • contribs) 03:25, November 2, 2012 UTC
- Wikipedia is written by volunteer editors working together. When disputes arise we discuss them on the talk page of the article involved. We do not consider it collaborative to persistently add content that other editors object to. Coming here with a specific agenda and insisting on its acceptance usually results in a block as you have discovered. As a new editor it behooves you to learn the ways of this project. A good place to start is at the welcome pages. Once you understand where things went wrong please consider following the instructions for appealing your block as described above. Thanks. Jojalozzo 16:18, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- I think WP:OR and WP:COI would have to be thoroughly addressed by this editor before any possible unblock should be considered.
- Administrators qualifications are not under question. However, your behavior has been deemed highly inappropriate, so you should also understand WP:NOTTHEM. Toddst1 (talk) 17:26, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fr. Biju John PhD.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rushbugled13 (talk) 06:52, 9 November 2012 (UTC)