User talk:Econ00

Welcome!

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Econ00, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Mihai Mutascu to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

The Teahouse - ask Wikipedians for general editing help
Articles for Creation Help Desk - ask reviewers for draft article help
Creating your first article
Referencing for beginners
Wikipedia Manual of Style

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liance^talk 21:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mihai Mutascu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mihai Mutascu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 22:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mihai Mutascu (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please remove the external links from the article body.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mihai Mutascu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 16:48, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Econ00! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! C F A 💬 16:48, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mihai Mutascu (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mihai Mutascu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:39, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mihai Mutascu (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This draft has too many issues; it reads very much like a CV. The external links are still present in the body, the infobox is broken, and the licence for the infobox photograph is missing. Why does the draft put so much emphasis on the subject's birthplace's name? We got a Romanian, German, and Magyar spelling, why not also an English, Russian, and Serbocroatian one? Timișoara is misspelt. Multiple strong points of view are not attributed to any sources. The lead section is too long, and most sections in this draft aren't prose. How did you phrase it? This is a draft "with strong improvement perspectives". Best, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 00:30, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mihai Mutascu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 00:30, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mihai Mutascu has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mihai Mutascu. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:28, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mihai Mutascu (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

At present, there is not enough evidence that Mutascu meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for academics. Further, as Johannes previously stated, the article currently reads like a resume.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mihai Mutascu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mihai Mutascu (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:COI.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mihai Mutascu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 08:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mihai Mutascu (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads like a resume, see WP:NOTRESUME.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mihai Mutascu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:52, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mihai Mutascu (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pygos was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I see that you have improved on your citations, and great job on that. However, it still looks very much like a resume, as previous reviewers mentioned. It deserves a structural rearrangement before you submit it again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mihai Mutascu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pygos (talk) 06:15, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mihai Mutascu has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mihai Mutascu. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:12, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your comment. I made changes to all page in order to need be as a resume. Hope that now everything is looks fine. Econ00 (talk) 11:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mihai Mutascu has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mihai Mutascu. Thanks! Ldm1954 (talk) 14:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ldm1954,

Thank you for your comment. May I ask if you have expertise in evaluating the academic and research impact of professors, particularly in terms of publication metrics? Additionally, are you familiar with the Stanford/Elsevier rankings, which identify the top 2% of scientists globally? This recognition is often based on a combination of factors such as citation impact and productivity, and it provides a broader context beyond just Google Scholar metrics.

I understand your concerns regarding the publication record, but the Stanford/Elsevier ranking could offer a more comprehensive view of the professor’s standing in their field. Perhaps a deeper evaluation considering both qualitative and quantitative aspects would provide a more balanced perspective before any final decision is made.

Thank you very much for your understanding and support!

Best regards, Econ00 (talk) 21:09, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mihai Mutascu (October 20)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Snowman304 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Still a résumé (see WP:NOTRESUME) and has been submitted and rejected 7 times now. Multiple editors have commented on the quality, and nothing notable has changed.

Snowman304|talk 21:05, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]