User talk:Edit Centric

l8r

wherever you go, you make a difference

EC, I just wanted to drop by and say your efforts here were appreciated. I'm sorry things can get so turbulent here. I am sure wherever you go, you will make a difference like you made one here. I do hope someday you reconsider and come back again. You will be missed. Cheers, Kingturtle (talk) 23:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Get your a'rse back here!

Hey, common EC, ~~evertything was your fault, however,~~ we need guy's like you here. Your helpful, fair, trustworthy, ~~don't care about others, not everyone thinks of you~~ and an all around good guy. Don't let a couple of unappreciative people get you down. LOL! Get back here! I still need lessons in MHTL!--Victor9876 (talk) 01:29, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't go

We need you here at Wikipedia! But if you must, thanks for all you've done for USRD and Wikipedia, both in content and in working with other users. --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yay you're back! --Rschen7754 (T C) 06:33, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here and there, yeah. Edit Centric (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey there Edit. I noticed you've been quietly stopping by and silently helping out behind the scenes now and again. I'm glad to see you still care about Wikipedia. I think a lot of folks miss your calming words of wisdom, but I'm glad to see that you at least look in from time to time. Nothing real major going on that I've noticed lately, but I've been rather scarce at WQE, AN, AN/I these days - the good part of that is that I've now got my first 2 DYK's under my belt, and one article up for GA assessment. I'm in PA, so spring is kinda peeking around the corner here, so summer can't be too far away. Well, anyway - just wanted to say hi, hope you and your family are doing well. Hope the DVD for 9/11 is coming along for ya. You take care. ;) — Ched ~ ^(yes?)/_© 09:43, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Please respond when you can. Are you sure that CNN was the first to break the news? Why didn't channels like Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon suspend programming on 9/11.? Bob.--99.141.141.25 (talk) 19:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, as I remember it, CNN was one of the first networks to break the news of fire at the WTC. I would assume that the reason CN and NICK did not interrupt their feeds is that the prime audience for these channels is under 14, and to do so would only have exacerbated the problem by traumatizing our children. Edit Centric (talk) 19:50, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help please

In February of this year[1] you were helpful bringing a calm head to a heated interpersonal editor conflict between myself and User:Yaf over some difficult collaboration at the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution article. Progress since then has been very slow, and lately I have had a very hard time making a connection with Yaf. See for instance in the last day or so where when I make an edit and invite discussion[2] on the talk page, Yaf refuses participation on the talk page and then does blanket reverts[3][4] of my edits. I don't want to go down the 3RR warning path again, as that didn't work. Also, Yaf and I are not likely to see eye-to-eye, never the less there needs to be some way that editors who disagree can still find ways to work together. Do you have suggestions how I might encourage Yaf to engage in discussions with me to reach difficult compromises? SaltyBoatr (talk) 19:42, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Edit Centric. You have new messages at Ttonyb1's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Central Valley

Hi there, I've just joined the California Wikiproject. I'm dropping you a note because I notice you're interested in the Valley. I am interested in working with a group of editors to improve the Central Valley's Wikipedia presence. For example, the Central Valley (California) article is assessed "top importance" but has the lowest possible quality rating. You seem especially interested in water infrastructure. I'm a student of water law and would like to better highlight the role of water in the Valley, especially the CVP/SWP. If you're willing to help with ideas or writing, then by all means drop by the project talk page: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_California. Thanks! ferretstew (talk) 09:42, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi di ho!

Long time no see. Wanna come on IRC? Just for a chat?Mitch32^{(Want help? See here!)} 17:45, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Naming Conventions. RFC: Removal of exceptions to "use common names" passage.

This is to inform you that removing exceptions to the use of "most Common Names" as the titles of Wikipedia articles from the the Talk:Naming_Conventions policy page, is the subject of a referral for Comment (RfC). This follows recent changes by some editors.

You are being informed as an editor previously involved in discussion of these issues relevant to that policy page. You are invited to comment at this location. Xandar 21:38, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rjanag Conduct RfC

A Request for Comments has been opened concerning the conduct of Rjanag. This follows the suggestion of a number of arbitrators at the Rjanag RfA. I am contacting you because you previously participated in the underlying referenced Ottava Rima AN/I.

The RfC can be found here.

Editors (including those who certify the RfC) can offer comments by:

(a) posting their own view; and/or

(b) endorsing one or more views of others.

You may certify or endorse the original RfC statement. You may also endorse as many views as you wish, including Rjanag's response. Anyone can endorse any views, regardless of whether they are outside parties or inside parties.

Information on the RfC process can be found at:

Thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 21:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KernCoSeal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KernCoSeal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 10:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned user image File:Illumina.jpg

I was wondering if you remembered you had this image, and if you had any plans for it. Had you been inactive, I'd have placed it up for deletion, since it is an orphaned image that can't be used in the articlespace, however since you're active, you have a few options. a) you can move it to commons, at which point you can do whatever you want with it, and I won't ever bother you about it again. b) you could put it into use, in which case it would not be orphaned anymore, and I would have no reason to care that it's sitting around. c) you could put it up for deletion if you no longer want it. d) you could ask someone (incl. myself) to rename it, then remove the {{Rename media|2=[[Wikipedia:Database reports/Largely duplicative file names]]}} tag. If you did that, there's little chance I'd ever find the image again, and since I'm working on cleaning out that specific category, I'd have no reason to chase after you. Sven Manguard Wha? 09:15, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well Sven, try toning down your approach, and I MIGHT be inclined to accomodate your requests for action. Keep coming at me like you're the HMFIC of the Wiki, ("at which point you can do whatever you want with it, and I won't ever bother you about it again", "and I would have no reason to care that it's sitting around", "I'd have no reason to chase after you,") and I'll be quite content to let the little bugger sit there for another year, quietly minding its own business. What, you've been on here (Wikipedia) for ONLY a year, and you're going to presume to take an administrative ("I'm in charge") typographical tone with ME (editing here since 2006!)? Please stop being such an upstart, ESPECIALLY in MY talkspace. You're just another editor, just like me. Now if Jimbo Wales himself messages me and asks (or tells) me to do something with this image, I'll jump like a frog. Edit Centric ^talk 18:18, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't my intention. Since in my experience most people, even people who have a lot of experience with editing Wikipedia, don't particularly know much when it comes to dealing with files, when I come to users with image related problems, I tend to list a few options, which tends to result in the other person getting back to me with "yeah, can you do X for me, that sounds good". I suppose my wording was either exceedingly off or you're taking it in an exceedingly bad way, but it wasn't my intention to insult you, I was just trying to make the whole process simpler. Since there's clearly a large gap in communication here, please accept my apologies. Unless you contact me, I won't purposefully come back to this page. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:31, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted, I'm all about "closing the gap." Just so that I might recapitulate in a more amicable manner, the aspects that "put me off" upon reading your first message to me were:

That it was your first message to me. I had never heard of "Sven Manguard" prior to this contact.
The presentation of a seemingly overly-authoritative tone. ("...I would have no reason to care that it's sitting around")

Because of this, I looked into you. I reviewed your user contributions page, and saw that you created your user profile back in September of 2010. I also perused your user page, especially the section on Links and Tools. From what I gathered there, you also aspire to become a Wikipedia administrator...

Now, having aspirations is a good thing. Without them, we wouldn't have leaders. Know this however, that aspiring to become an admin here can be a two-edged sword. Once you make that known, your words, your actions, your management skills, your "grace under fire" and your ability to coax a positive response from others is under increased scrutiny. Once you gain adminship, responsibility should be among your short list of "modus operandi" words.

As for the image, I'm thinking deletion. Option "D" seems kind of counter-productive, since the overall objective of the exercise is to clear these orphaned images from the server completely. Otherwise, it's still taking up space. Give me a few days to think about it, especially since I now use this image in conjunction with my weblog, which unlike Wikipedia, carries definite intellectual property rights. Edit Centric ^talk 19:29, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No matter, User:Fastily just deleted it. Since I was leaning in that direction anyway, no biggie... Edit Centric ^talk 19:35, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I'm sorry about the comments from the 11th. Reading them now, I can see how you formed the conclusion that you did. I am normally far more coherent than I was there, and I'm not entirely sure what happened, however that's no excuse. I screwed up, so I need to apologize. I am glad that this all wound down in a relatively amicable fashion. See you around. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:39, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good, for my part, I'm completely sorry for replying so "snappily" this morning, your message caught me before my first cup of java. (No excuse, but I might want to stop drinking so much coffee!) Edit Centric ^talk 06:11, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know what it's like to be helplessly addicted to caffeine, although in my case, it's soda. Cheers, Sven Manguard Wha? 06:57, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TulareCoSeal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TulareCoSeal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:57, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

USRD WikiProject Newsletter, Winter 2012


Volume 5, Issue 1 • Winter 2011 • About the Newsletter
This edition is going out to all USRD WikiProject members (current, former, or potential) in addition to other subscribers as part of a roll call to update the participants list. Anyone that would like to continue to receive this newsletter in the future needs to update the subscription list if they are not already subscribed.
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features U.S. Roads consolidates M-6 article makes headlines Planning Department debuts Stub drive concludes early, successfully Editorial	State and national updates Project news Task force reports for MD, MI, PA, and VA
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—Imzadi 1979 → 22:00, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

California seals

Hey there! I just wanted to say thanks for uploading all those images of California county seals! I hang around U.S. county pages a lot and your work had definitely been noticed there! --Andrew (User:90) (talk) 21:24, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hantavirus Risk in Yosemite

Hi, I noticed you recently contributed to the Hantavirus article. I've been having trouble adding mention of the 2012 Hantarvirus Outbreak to the main Yosemite_National_Park Page. I have written a new one-sentence draft of this edit in one of my subpages: User:Airelor/Yosemite_National_Park.

Please take a look and suggest any other edits or make any changes as you see fit before I try to add it to the main Yosemite_National_Park page. If you know of any administrators or WikiUsers you can refer this draft (or me) specifically to for advice about this matter, that would be very appreciated too. Thank you. Airelor (talk) 22:06, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but where were you going to add it? Which section? (If it t'were me, I would add it to the Biology, Management issues section.) Also, you might want to consider the fact that there is already a sizable entry on the topic in the Curry Village article space. Edit Centric ^talk 20:26, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was also thinking of adding it after the Biology, Management issues section. My suggested edit is basically just a link to that topic on the Curry Village. However, I've been meeting a lot of resistance from more senior editors against adding mention of the Hantavirus to the Yosemite_National_Park page.. Airelor (talk) 00:28, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, I'm seeing that "resistance" now, I just reviewed that section of the talk page. After giving the whole issue a look-see and reading through both the YNP and Curry Village articles, I'm afraid I have to agree with JOJ ^Hutton and Vsmith (talk), but with a caveat! In the likely event that the ongoing (yes, this situation is still evolving, I know this for a fact, residing just down the hill from YNP!) efforts at vector mitigation result in lasting changes to the park as a whole, then an explanation of what caused these changes, i.e., the Hantavirus outbreak and its associated impacts on wildlife management need to be added to the "Biology / Management Issues" section. Right now, it's too early to tell, even for a "local yokel" such as myself. (A close friend was laid off by the concessioner just last week, due to a severe decline in tourism resulting from this whole Hanta issue.) My best advice would be to allow this situation to reach some sort of fruition, and then go from there. Edit Centric ^talk 10:39, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, well thank you for looking into the issue. And taking care to kindly explain how you see it with me. Airelor (talk) 16:25, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Historicity of Jesus". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 12 August 2014.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 23:11, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Historicity of Jesus, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, Sunray (talk) 04:15, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:VenturaCoSeal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VenturaCoSeal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ModocCoSeal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ModocCoSeal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Edit Centric. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Benazir Bhutto memoriam.jpg

The file File:Benazir Bhutto memoriam.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned file, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:48, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Edit Centric. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Edit Centric. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve HAEVN

Hello, Edit Centric,

Thanks for creating HAEVN! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 18:51, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|Boleyn}}Hello, Boleyn!

I'm hoping that we can get some other Wikipedians to jump on and work the article, adding references and further correcting some of the grammatical elements that result from the transferring of the material from the Dutch wiki. As HAEVN's music is starting to find an audience on THIS side of the pond, I thought that creating an English language article was appropriate. I just wanted to get the ball rolling / baton moving, hopefully I can hand the baton off to another runner to advance down the track. ;-) (It's been literally years since I last took up a wiki article project of this type, the last one being the piece on Foot drill in 2006.)

Edit Centric ^talk 19:10, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HAEVN moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, HAEVN, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:23, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]