User talk:Ekspertiza

Ekspertiza, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ekspertiza! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ekspertiza

A tag has been placed on User:Ekspertiza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drmies (talk) 17:06, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (Hi...I am preparing new page and i am workin in it...for this i edit in only my user page...i am fan of german football team....and there are not page about statistic or records about this...so i want to create this...i think this is sufficient reason that my page might not deleted...very thanks) --Ekspertiza (talk) 17:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, OK ... but you shouldn't try to do that on your user page, which is for information about you that is relevant to your edits here. You could start such a page either at User:Ekspertiza/Sandbox (or replace the word "Sandbox" with any suitable title), or, perhaps better, at Draft:(Your title here). Meanwhile, was this content copied from somewhere? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:47, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

yes i am creating that page in English language...can not i do??...and i understood....i will do this in draft page...i did not know that i can not do it in my user page...sorry...Ekspertiza (talk) 17:53, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that depends; where is it copied from? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:59, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

you know it, why are you asking???

No, I'm asking because I don't know – though I'm sure i could find out be searching. If it is from de.wp then you must provide attribution under the terms of our licence; if it's from elsewhere then it probably can't be hosted here, as it is likely to be a copyright violation. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:14, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

List of international matches of Germany national football team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Palma, Faro, Split, Oeiras and Mundialito

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Template talk:Userspace draft, you may be blocked from editing. Chris Troutman (talk) 12:56, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

:okEkspertiza (talk) 13:09, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Germany national football team results

Hello, I think you should move this table to a draft page or a user page, and eventually publish something more like Germany national football team results (2000–present). The current article seems likely to be deleted if it's proposed for deletion at AfD. Onetwothreeip (talk) 05:42, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of German national football players moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of German national football players, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:00, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Germany national football team statistics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Porter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, List of German national football players

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of German national football players. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of Germany international footballers. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of Germany international footballers. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 06:12, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Germany national football team results

You added half the text again, the format you have used is unacceptably large to read or edit, the 2000-2019 results are already in another article so don't need to be shown here as well, and the edit history of this article indicates you are unwilling to have other editors improve the article by reducing its length to a normal standard. It is you who is at risk of being blocked, please do not threaten me with baseless accusations of vandalism. Please see the discussion of the article at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Germany national football team results and comment there. Crowsus (talk) 09:46, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are trying my patience with your attitude, and once it is added to Wikipedia it is not 'yours' to decide what should or should not be on it above anyone else. I suggest you listen to the other editors (not just me) who are trying to help. If you continue to revert and ignore assistance, you'll just end up getting a ban and the article will be changed in your absence anyway. Crowsus (talk) 09:54, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Go to the WP:FOOTY page as requested and explain yourself there. In my opinion, your format is not better than the 2000-2019 results article. Crowsus (talk) 09:56, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

115,000 bytes (the size of the 2000-2019 section) is very much enlargening it. Look, why don't you create a few other articles, eg with the eras I suggested or whatever you like, then you can still have the overall statistics on the existing page and you would have your name on each of the sections. It's just far too much to have on a single article for a nation that has played so many games. Compare with England, which is split into 10 articles×or something. What you have added is fine but it's just too big in its current form. I am trying to help you and the work you're doing. Crowsus (talk) 10:08, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Germany national football team results. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 10:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Germany national football team results; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 10:40, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ekspertiza

A tag has been placed on User:Ekspertiza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:45, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Use your sandbox for drafts

Use User:Ekspertiza/sandbox to create a new draft. You don't use user pages for that. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:47, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. HawkAussie (talk) 09:52, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ekspertiza (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hello....please unblock me...i said that i understood my mistakes and will not do it again...i am fan of german football team and love all about of their football and i collect all statistics about germany's football ...because of this i want create or edit more page, informations or statistics and as many people i made mistakes....seriously i dont want do them again, already i did not do them purposely but careless...so please unblock me....and i dont use user:Schami1989 anymore Ekspertiza (talk) 17:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert Mond (footballer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Robert Mond (footballer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ZLEA _T\^C 22:32, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]