User talk:Ela112

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Ela112! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to a

Sri Lanka related article, they have helped improve Wikipedia and make it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions.

As a contributor to Sri Lankan articles, you may like to connect with other Sri Lankan Wikipedians through WikiProject Sri Lanka, a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Sri Lanka, and take a look at the various activities we are engaged in.

If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or write {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. If you have a question related to a Sri Lankan article, you can view a list of members of WikiProject Sri Lanka by clicking here and ask any of us a question. We will always be glad to help.

When you edit, please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{Walkie-talkie} 06:04, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Sri Lanka pages

Hello and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Two things :

1) Please try and wikify pages as to make it easier for subsequent editors.
2) you have added numerous pages sourced as "This page incorporates content from Dr. Rohan Hettiarachchi's ". Could you please elaborate further on your permission to copy text from that page to Wikipedia ? Travelbird 14:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY :-

I have contacted the admin of the site and he has granted me permission. I further attach my email :-

Please feel free to use any information on this site, Good luck, Rohan Hettiarachchi

> > Dear Sir/Madam > > I want to know whether the information provided in www.lankalibrary.com > can be freely used, i.e - in an entry in www.wikipedia.org , i would like > to know the copy right status of the information supplied. > Thank You.

Thank you for your reply. Please add something like "used with permisson of website owner" to your source notes, so that other editors may see that your use is legitimate. Travelbird

That's fine, but you are just cutting and pasting. Someone reading that article would have no idea where these statues are (in fact, you call Sri Lanka by the old name Ceyleon) and are not formatted at all. Please read the guide to wiki standards. Czolgolz 15:00, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ancient Constructions of Sri Lanka

If this is only going to be a collection of links elsewhere, this would be better as a category. Grand master ka 06:11, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Ruhuna. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! --Zoz (t) 09:21, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia once again. I've been looking through your edits and have a couple of words of advice for you to stop your edits being reverted or having templates such as {{context}} or {{wikify}} being added.

Firstly, you should make yourself familiar with the Manual of Style (MOS) that describes how pages should be formatted etc.

Secondly, it's always a good idea to act on templates that are added to your articles, rather than just removing them. The articles you are writing are very valuable to the community but in general, to the reader who is not very familiar with Sri Lankan architecture and sculptures and history, they require a certain amount of context.

If you'd like to talk more about any of this then don't hesitate to get in touch on my talk page. Budgiekiller 09:43, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Again, thank you for your numerous contributions. Could I gently remind you that writing an article for Wikipedia requires you to keep an eye on the Manual of Style (MOS), rather than just creating articles by copying and pasting text in. Other users will add {{context}} or {{wikify}} to each of your contributions until you provide the reader with an article with some context and whose style is in-line with the MOS. A couple of general points:

You could add a {{stub}} template to the very short articles you write about the various stupa so that other authors would be encouraged to contribute to it.
You could add some category tags (which I've seen you've just started to do) to your articles - this certainly makes them more useful, easier to locate and group etc.

Thanks again for all your hard work, just a bit more time spent on the basics I've outlined will make your contributions first class! If you'd like to discuss any of this, please don't hesitate to get in touch. Budgiekiller 09:54, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget to add categories and stubs to your work!! Budgiekiller 11:15, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proto History of Sri Lanka

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Proto History of Sri Lanka, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.lankalibrary.com/geo/dera1.html. As a copyright violation, Proto History of Sri Lanka appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Proto History of Sri Lanka has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Proto History of Sri Lanka. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Proto History of Sri Lanka, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esprit15d (talk • contribs)

Copyrighted text on Sri Lanka pages

Ela112, before you post copyrighted text used with permission on Wikipedia, you must first forward that permission to permissions AT wikimedia.org. You may also ask the website owner to send an email himself, stating that he/she licenses his texts under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). Alternatively, you can just ask the owner to include a statement on his web site saying that the texts are licensed under the terms of the GFDL. Until such a declaration has been made, the text is still copyright violation. Thank you. SCHZMO ✍ 20:43, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Permission had been granted to this website

i was going through the article discussion for Mihintale and also found that "Permission has been received from the copyright holder to license this material under the GNU Free Documentation License, and evidence of this has been lodged with the Wikimedia PR department "

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mihintale

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from Dr. Rohan Hettiarachchi. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2006020210007028.
This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

~~I see there is justification for that website~~ and I have removed the copyvio notices on pages that were taken only from that website, but part of Irrigation Works of Ancient Sri Lanka was copied from [1] (section 3.1), which is copyrighted, so I cannot remove the copyvio for that page. SCHZMO ✍ 02:00, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I don't think that permission is sufficient. The owner must agree to license his material under the terms specifically in the GNU Free Documentation License. Please feel free to use any information on this site is not nearly the same as I agree to license this material under GFDL. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for the specific steps on how to request and confirm copyright permission. SCHZMO ✍ 10:22, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Categories and subcategories

Hey, thanks for your recent communication on my talk page, glad to know that I'm not talking to myself all the time!! I hope that the advice I've given has been helpful and that you will be able to apply it to your future edits.

I have noticed one or two last possible issues with some of your pages, one of which is adding pages to a category and to one of that category's subcategories. Now, there is a guide to this here which says that under certain circumstances, it's allowable within the style of Wikipedia. An example where I'm concerned is Thuparamaya which you have categorised under both Category:Stupas in Anuradhapura and Category:Stupas in Sri Lanka. I would have thought that the first category is a subcategory of the second, so you would only need to tag it as Category:Stupas in Anuradhapura. However, I'm no expert in the history, nor the geography of Sri Lanka and its stupas so I'm more than happy to be corrected!!

Secondly, Vessagiri, for example, is currently in Category:Ancient Constructions of Sri Lanka which will probably need to be renamed Category:Ancient constructions of Sri Lanka - minor, but I expect it'll happen, just to make you aware. Once renamed, you could add an appropriate supercategory (e.g. Category:History of Sri Lanka to it, and then make sure you don't have cats and sub-cats on the same page!

Confused?! I am! Anyway, once more, I hope this is helpful. If you'd like to discuss things further then I'd be more than happy to do so on my talk page! All the best, Budgiekiller 09:57, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll try again. Say you had an article about a Volkswagen Beetle. Now you can easily tag this as a Car or as a Volkswagen model. Tagging as both is a waste of time because the category of Volkswagen model would be a subcategory of Car. You would only want it to appear in the lowest sub-category available. Any clearer?! Budgiekiller 18:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wanniyala Aetto language

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Wanniyala Aetto language, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from {{{url}}}. As a copyright violation, Wanniyala Aetto language appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Wanniyala Aetto language has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Wanniyala Aetto language. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Wanniyala Aetto language, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Erechtheus 16:54, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

new sri lanka waterworks article

i enjoyed reading this new article. could you provide the sources in detail? that would add a great deal to the quality of this article. for example give complet cite for Parker, 1981. thanks Anlace 22:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page

You left a template that makes no sense on my talk page. I have removed it. Did you intend to leave me a message instead? Erechtheus 22:36, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nagadipa Purana Vihara

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Nagadipa Purana Vihara, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.lankalibrary.com/heritage/solos.htm#Nagadipa. As a copyright violation, Nagadipa Purana Vihara appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Nagadipa Purana Vihara has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Nagadipa Purana Vihara. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Nagadipa Purana Vihara, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Whpq 04:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Irrigation Works of ancient Sri Lanka

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Irrigation Works of ancient Sri Lanka, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/T0028E/T0028E03.htm. As a copyright violation, Irrigation Works of ancient Sri Lanka appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Irrigation Works of ancient Sri Lanka has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Irrigation Works of ancient Sri Lanka. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Irrigation Works of ancient Sri Lanka, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Moonraker88 10:50, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Devil dances of Sri Lanka

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Devil dances of Sri Lanka, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.lankalibrary.com/rit/yakun%20natuma.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Devil dances of Sri Lanka and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Devil dances of Sri Lanka with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Devil dances of Sri Lanka.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Devil dances of Sri Lanka/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Devil dances of Sri Lanka saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! TheRingess (talk) 18:30, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Dighavapi Raja Maha Vihara

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dighavapi Raja Maha Vihara, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dighavapi Raja Maha Vihara seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dighavapi Raja Maha Vihara, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:28, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Sri Lanka

Hello! Ela112, I thought you may be interested in joining WikiProject Sri Lanka. We work on creating, expanding and making general changes to Sri Lanka related articles. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Members Page! Thank You. Blackknight12 (talk) 10:27, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:IMG 3512.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:IMG 3512.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 23:50, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please claim your upload(s): File:Wellawatte Beach Sunset.jpg

Hi, Thank you, for uploading this file.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm some details,

If it's your own work, please include {{own}}, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add |claimed=yes to the {{media by uploader}} or {{presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

If it's not your own work please provide as much sourcing/authorship information as you are able to.

It would also be appreciated if you could "claim" or update the source and licensing on other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transferred to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:18, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sigiriya Rock.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sigiriya Rock.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:58, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Way up.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Way up.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:33, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ancient capitals of Sri Lanka

Template:Ancient capitals of Sri Lanka has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:16, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sri Lanka drums

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sri Lanka drums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://liy0005.wixsite.com/sri-lankan-culture/emotional, https://www.angampora.com/rituals/, and https://writebetter.io/examples/the+other+side+is/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dan arndt (talk) 13:25, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Files moved

Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I've moved some (or all) of your files uploaded here to Wikimedia Commons. What files are those exactly? See here. --TheImaCow (talk) 14:19, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Lions Paws.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Lions Paws.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:WAy Down.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:WAy Down.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]