User talk:Gadri

Speedy deletion nomination of Rai Sahiras

Hello Gadri,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rai Sahiras for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Hashim 08:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rai Sahasi I

Please learn how ro write a Wikipedia Page. Xx236 (talk) 10:35, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gadri, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Gadri! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of North western subcontinent

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on North western subcontinent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. IagoQnsi (talk) 04:25, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Gadri. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. IagoQnsi (talk) 04:29, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gadri, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. IagoQnsi (talk) 04:30, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gadri, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. IagoQnsi (talk) 04:33, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Gadri. IagoQnsi (talk) 04:37, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of North western subcontinent

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on North western subcontinent, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 06:44, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gadri people

Hello Gadri,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gadri people for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Maharayamui (talk) 06:45, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gadre

Hello Gadri,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gadre for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Maharayamui (talk) 06:46, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive Editing

Please stop creating one liner articles redirecting to the article Gadri. You might be banned from editing Wikipedia if you persist with this behaviour. Maharayamui (talk) 06:48, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gaadri

Hello Gadri,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gaadri for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Maharayamui (talk) 06:49, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gadri

Please learn how to write a Wikipedia page.Xx236 (talk) 09:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruption, including persistent addition of unsourced content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gadri, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Nthep (talk) 12:18, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

please, now im using master account, and my this account is master account. Please unblock. :-) Gadri (talk) 07:42, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gadri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I,m a blocked user, because of sock puppetry, i,m very sorry, but I did so unwittingly, so I want to unblock my account Gadri Gadri (talk) 07:47, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please explain your reason for creating and using multiple accounts. Unwittingly is not possible; account creation can only be done deliberately.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 09:54, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi! Please unblock my account. :-) Gadri (talk) 07:47, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please! Any administrator, yamaguchi, RegentsPark, Doug weller, etc... :-) Gadri (talk) 07:55, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I made many accounts , because in that time (i mean when i was new), i don,t know much about Wikipedia, i think that if a person forget password, or when account was blocked, it is permission to build another account. Gadri (talk) 10:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{ db - user}} Gadri (talk) 14:42, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

Hey! I told you, that if you unblock my account, then i,ll (inshallah) stop creating new. OK.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gadri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i,m sorry, please unblock my account, i know i do sock puppettry, bu unwittingly. Because when i joined Wikipedia in march, i don,t know much about Wikipedia, i thinked that Wikipedia is like other websites like Facebook, where it is allowed to create more accounts, no i learned. I don,t want to create new accounts but Blocking me again and again forced me, and also makes me angry. Just try me if You found. OK

Decline reason:

You've continued to create new accounts -- you did so 15 minutes before making this request. You seem to really be missing the point. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 13:22, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi!Yamaguchi先生, i made unblock request, see up. Gadri (talk) 11:19, 13 April 2016 (UTC) Gadri (talk) 11:19, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!user:Yamaguchi先生 i made request see up. Gadri (talk) 11:20, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi !user:Yamaguchi先生. see. Gadri (talk) 11:21, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why no response user:Yamaguchi先生 Gadri (talk) 11:40, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi user:David Biddulph please response to my unblock request. Gadri (talk) 11:44, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!Administrators, im requesting you, lease see above Gadri (talk) 11:57, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Only try me, unblock me for only 1 day if i made new more accounts, then block me again. Gadri (talk) 14:05, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gadri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Yamaguchi先生: Listen to me, now im agree and thinking that not to built another account again, i know i do sock puppetry , and do no good but You also have to understand me that i,m a good faith editor and stopped creating new accounts now. I,m relly sorry, but You may know that when you blocked me, i was new user, and not know much. But Now.

Decline reason:

Perhaps you should consider contributing to the Wikipedia of your native language. In addition to adding uncited information, and creating multiple accounts you seem to have difficulty communicating. Given how recent your sock puppetry was I don't think an unblock is a good idea. HighInBC 14:41, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please now unblock me , you asked me at my talk page user:~~(…MA.Tay.CA…)~~ PLEASE.......... Gadri (talk) 14:31, 13 April 2016 (UTC) Gadri (talk) 14:31, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@HighInBC:, Listen to, i started sock puppetery during my new days at Wikipedia, because in my new days, i thought that creating more accounts is no problem like other websites. But i got some messages, that your account is blocked because of sock puppet , then i slowly learned.

Its detailed history.

So Please answer and unblock me, ok. :-) Gadri (talk) 14:53, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gadri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Yamaguchi先生:, only tell me how long does it take to remain me unblock i told you many times, that i stopped creating new account , and i stopped sock puppetery. See my old unblock requests for more reasonal information.

Decline reason:

In addition to the other issues mentioned above, you do not appear to posses necessary competence in the English language to edit this Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Gadri (talk) 15:20, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamaguchi先生: just answer and unblock Gadri (talk) 15:51, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Enough!

With your most recent sock, Abc123""""j (talk · contribs), you have convinced me that you have neither the intention nor the ability to edit Wikipedia constructively. I'll revoke your talk page access for this account as well as any of your sock accounts that you still seem to use. Goodbye! Favonian (talk) 11:47, 14 April 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Gadri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16238 was submitted on Jul 29, 2016 13:27:50. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 13:27, 29 July 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Gadri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16421 was submitted on Aug 26, 2016 14:23:58. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 14:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]