User talk:Gindomarlo
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Cause of death in infobox on José José article
[edit]Hello. I can't help but notice that you have repeatedly instated a cause of death on the infobox on José José's article. As I have previously pointed out, per template guidelines on how to most effectively use infoboxes, the cause of death parameter "should not be filled in for unremarkable deaths such as those from old age or routine illness", and only when "the cause of death has significance for the subject's notability."
Cancer is a common cause of death, no matter the type. There are very few circumstances under which someone dying from cancer is a core portion of their notability, and as far as I can tell, it's unlikely that his dying from pancreatic cancer is going to become that. If you believe otherwise, and that the cause merits inclusion, please seek consensus on the article's talk page. Continuing to place it on the article after other editors remove it is unlikely to make the change permanent, and you may become involved in an edit war.--Sunshineisles2 (talk) 20:49, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Warning
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Asqueladd (talk) 04:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
February 2020
[edit] Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse cases, you may be blocked from editing. Sandstein 12:24, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
![Stop icon with clock](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/39/Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Sandstein 19:38, 27 February 2020 (UTC)![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Gindomarlo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is a block based on the subjective opinion of the administrator who blocked me. there is no way that putting this image is a violation of the WP:MUG. It's just a picture of Winstein smiling on a red carpet. Gindomarlo (talk) 21:54, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
It's not and you know it. However, maybe you established consensus for this change; please demonstrate that you did so and I would concur the block should be lifted. Yamla (talk) 22:01, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
March 2020
[edit] Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hugh Jackman, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 10:12, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Replaceable non-free use File:Larry Nassar.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/32px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Larry Nassar.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)