User talk:Grayson Pitman

Welcome![edit]

Hi Grayson Pitman! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Binksternet (talk) 03:04, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What sources are reliable?[edit]

I see you have cited a user review from Sputnik. Those are considered unreliable; see the description at WP:ALBUMAVOID. Sputnik is okay if the reviewer is Staff or Emeritus, but not User.

You have also cited a google doc. You should instead cite the actual published source, then say that is hosted online at the URL. But if the online URL is a copyright infringement, then you can't use it. Binksternet (talk) 03:09, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Johnj1995. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of Bohemian Rhapsody cover versions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 15:44, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Liverpool Beats (February 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the sources used are not reliable (Discogs, Googledocs, etc.).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Liverpool Beats and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:03, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Grayson Pitman! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 18:03, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heat Above has been accepted[edit]

Heat Above, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 05:01, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Built By Nations moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Built By Nations, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. NP83 (talk) 02:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Copyright problem[edit]

Text and references were copied from Greta Van Fleet to List of awards and nominations received by Greta Van Fleet. You failed to give credit to the editors who are listed in the article history. See WP:Copying within Wikipedia. That was required. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 09:43, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia is encouraged.

But this is particularly a problem when you copy and remove large quantities of material. Essentially you gutted that whole section.

It should be done in the WP:Edit summary.

It merited an attribution comment in both articles talk pages.

Fixed. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 10:12, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Liverpool Beats[edit]

Hello, Grayson Pitman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Liverpool Beats, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Liverpool Beats[edit]

Hello, Grayson Pitman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Liverpool Beats".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:26, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Locomotive (Complicity), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slash. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Grayson Pitman! Your additions to Locomotive (Complicity) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:49, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Songs covered by Greta Van Fleet has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Songs covered by Greta Van Fleet has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:08, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Locomotive (Complicity), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. I have removed the entire "controversy" section that you added; as it was entirely original research. Please be mindful when expanding articles to not write new material or synthesize sources; only put in what is reported by the reliable sources. RF23 (talk) 08:57, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Built By Nations[edit]

Hello, Grayson Pitman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Built By Nations, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:05, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Kiszka Article Help[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Text is messed up and I cannot solve. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grayson Pitman (talk • contribs) 14:30, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You had an excess of bold formatting (''') throughout the body of the text. I have fixed it. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 14:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chloee Kleespies for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chloee Kleespies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chloee Kleespies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

A412 (Talk • C) 20:20, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Individual band member articles[edit]

When creating articles for band members, Please don't pad them out with generic band information like this. We already have a band article for that information, and you added pretty much the same exact info across 3 separate band members articles.

Obviously it's fine to mention the band in their articles, but generally speaking, band members articles should focus on the band members themselves, not just rehashing the band's general history. And if there's not much to say about them as individuals, you should question whether or not a separate article is necessary. Sergecross73 msg me 18:21, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnicelebs as a reference[edit]

Hi Grayson Pitman. I noticed that you used ethnicelebs.com as a reference for biographical information in Sam Kiszka. Please note that the general consensus as expressed at WP:RSN is that it does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. I've gone ahead and removed it. If you disagree, let's discuss it. You may want to check WP:RSP and WP:RSN to help determine if a source is reliable. Thanks.--Hipal (talk) 18:36, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Josh Kiszka for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Josh Kiszka, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Kiszka (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jake Kiszka for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jake Kiszka, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Kiszka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sam Kiszka for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sam Kiszka, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Kiszka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Sionk. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:12, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, not only was that completely inappropriate to lash out at Sionk like that, but I had previously warned you a month prior that the way you were creating band member articles was not appropriate, and you didn't address that at all. You should have seen this coming. You can't keep creating band member articles that are just 90% regurgitated general band info. You've got to slow down and learn how to write an article on Wikipedia, what sources are reliable or unreliable, etc, before you sink a ton of time writing entire articles, especially if its a WP:BLP, which have even stricter standards that regular articles. Please rethink your approach to Wikipedia. Sergecross73 msg me 18:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Avon Grove Graduates has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Avon Grove Graduates has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 02:30, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]