User talk:Green Echidna

This is Green Echidna's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Hello, Green Echidna, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 16:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

KylieTastic (talk) 16:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Faker.js (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Faker.js and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Faker.js, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Green Echidna! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 16:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Faker.js has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Faker.js. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:38, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Faker.js (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bsoyka was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As noted in the previous decline, Wikipedia is not a how-to guide.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Faker.js and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Faker.js, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bsoyka (talk) 23:39, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Green Echidna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Ladnav no esool". The reason given for Ladnav no esool's block is: "Disruptive editing". I not a sock, I have made 0 bad edits. I was trying to fix an article and I get this message.

Blocking administrator: ‪Ad Orientem‬ (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: I'm not convinced you are unrelated. Your IP addresses have been used by vandals and none of your edits have been to articles, nor have they been particularly constructive. Clearly, you have some form of relationship with the vandals and will need to be specifically clearer on this point. Yamla (talk) 15:32, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no relationship with the vandals. If I was a sock then why wouldn't I be a vandal? If you don't believe me then do a CheckUser on me. Green Echidna (talk) 15:39, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are not permitted to edit (or remove) declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Please do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 15:42, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I shouldn't be blocked. I am no vandalGreen Echidna (talk) 15:46, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-auto|1=127.0.0.1 | 2=<nowiki I shouldn't be blocked. I didn't do anything bad. I don't know why I am blocked. Please explain}}

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Eluike per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eluike. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 17:25, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]