Jump to content

User talk:Gugu Chiwo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Gugu Chiwo, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Kelvin Momo, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 16:56, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Kelvin Momo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 16:56, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelvin Momo (August 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 17:52, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Gugu Chiwo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 17:52, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:23, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Theroadislong (talk) 11:16, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 12:06, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelvin Momo (August 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:20, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Gugu Chiwo. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Kelvin Momo, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 13:44, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelvin Momo (August 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 15:17, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Kelvin Momo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 15:21, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Gugu Chiwo, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 21:16, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kelvin Momo, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:27, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gugu Chiwo (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I submitted repetitive information in an attempt to better the quality of my content and remove citations that are not reliable, I realize that most of my resources were not factual and have done research in order to do so. I have also looked at my article and saw that I can improve based on the new research I have conducted. I have been making several attempts in a short space of time to try and meet a deadline and I neglected the policies and guidelines for writing a Wikipedia article. I have done so and found better resources to base my article on. Gugu Chiwo (talk) 15:50, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock discussion

[edit]

A deadline? Would you mind explaining that? There is no deadline -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:16, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra I'm part of an internship program, we had to create a Wikipedia article before 18:00 today. Gugu Chiwo (talk) 16:18, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Intrigued. Do go on. What internship program? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:20, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What do you get in return for creating an article? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:21, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've also indeffed them on multiple projects (with various socks) so I'd take whatever they claim with a grain of salt. (The sock master being Stevence SA). PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:21, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Deepfriedokra I'm not sure if I'm at liberty to say within this platform. Gugu Chiwo (talk) 16:23, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
if you can't disclose who is asking you to edit, you cannot edit. The terms of use require disclosure. It's not optional. PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:25, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Praxidicae I am not being paid, it was merely an exercise. Gugu Chiwo (talk) 16:32, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And yet you were doing so at someone elses directive. So you need to disclose that. Period. This isn't rocket science. PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:33, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As you are an intern, you are an undeclared PAID editor, even if you are paid in kind, or with a grade, or any other non monetary inducement.. Your are required to disclose this employer. Please see WP:PAID. PAID editing is not against the rules. Undeclared paid editing is
Clearly, you are not here to build the encyclopedia. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:27, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Praxidicae: Thanks! Ah, the plot thickens! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:29, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A grain? Well within my NAS diet. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:31, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pleaase see WP:UPE -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:33, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]