Prova

Nuk lejohen te kopjohen artikuj nga website te tjera pa pasur leje, eshte kundra rregullave. Dori | Talk 01:31, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)

Per te gjithe shqipefolesit

Emrat e qyteteve shqiptare eshte mire qe te shkruhen sikurse te Wikipedia ne gjuhen shqipe ne trajten e shquar.

Kosovo city articles

Before renaming articles on Kosovo cities, could you please discuss it on the articles' talk pages? Their names are a very controversial question (as I'm sure you know) so please don't do it unilaterally. -- ChrisO 07:58, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

(en) SOK Statistical Office of Kosovo - (sr) Zavod za Statistiku (sq) Kosova - Enti i Statistikës së Kosovës (ESK).--Hipi Zhdripi 21:57, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Serbian Goverment

The Ende, Malo morgen --Hipi Zhdripi 01:29, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Everybody,who doesn´t accept UNMIK , but is writing for kosovo, is just making propaganda. it has nothing to do with english language. With people like that, i don t need to have a discussion. If you are able to accept UNMIK, than we can have a discussion.

First of all : UNMIK ! What does it mean ? UNMIK stands for United Nation Mission in KOSOVO. In Kosovo ! There are no words for Serbian teritory or things like that. If you would be so nice, to have a look to the homepage from UNMIK, you can see yourself : there are no words for Kosovo in serbian territory . They are just writing " ...in the war-ravaged province [1] of Kosovo... " Than you can read this :

perform basic civilian administrative functions;
promote the establishment of substantial autonomy and self-government in Kosovo;
facilitate a political process to determine Kosovo's future status;
coordinate humanitarian and disaster relief of all international agencies;
support the reconstruction of key infrastructure;
maintain civil law and order;
promote human rights; and
assure the safe and unimpeded return of all refugees and displaced persons to their homes in Kosovo.

That means, Kosovo doesn t have a status( it s war - ravaged ! ). It s just a province, administrated by UNMIK,and nothing else. It doesn t belong to any other state or country. UNMIK is there to help the kosovars to decide for their future.Every other offical reference, like offical serbian - or offical albanian reference, is just propaganda. From that point of knowledge, our discussion is, like I would say Serbia or Albania is a province in China. All articles with the subject " Kosovo ", which have to do with information or references BEFORE the 10. june 1999 belongs to the article " History of Kosovo ". In an other case, I ll delete it , because i took it like propaganda and not like neutral information for Wikipedia. People in this discussion, who don t accept UNMIK, aren t neutral. They are living in an own dreamworld, what has nothing to do with reallity and they are using the Wikipedia for their own propaganda.

If somebody think, that I m wrong, please show me. But please argue with informations from an OFFICIAL document, accepted from UNMIK and not with an dokument from national offical propaganda informations. We can have a disskussion with facts from UNMIK, not with the past. Wikipedia stands for knowledge and shouldn t have to become a place for national propaganda, no matter if it s serbian or albanian propaganda. In other case serbian and albanian people will ravage it, like they ve ravaged Kosovo.--Hipi Zhdripi 21:01, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Names of places in Kosovo

Hello! I noticed in your contribs that you are "pushing" Albanian names for places in Kosovo (including Kosova). For example, you created a page Prizreni District, while there already is an article Prizren District. I am perfectly fine with and encourage the addition of Albanian names in every applicable article, but we need to respect that this is not an Albanian wiki, but an English one. So, for example, an English word for Albanian "Kosova" is "Kosovo" (e.g. [2] or [3]).

Also, "Prizren District" is named after the biggest city in it, which is: Prizren (which is the name in Albanian, English and Serbian), so the name of that district is "Prizren District" in English, and not "Prizreni District" (just like it's not "Prizrenski District").

Finally, you are kind of making a mess with adding "double articles". We need to think of a way to handle that. I hope you assume good faith, and help us work this out, without going against the community. --Dejan Cabrilo 01:08, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hi, I am doing tha same that UNMIK is doing in Kosovo. For exampel: Pristina in english Pri-s-tina than is better Prishtina (Pri-sh-tina), Pec (Pe-c-), Gj-ilan is better Gnilan. So article Prishtina, redirect Pristina, article Gnilan rediret Gjilani. OK :)).

It's not very OK :) Just because UNMIK may or may not do it, does not mean that Wikipedia has to do the same thing. Kosovo is still called Kosovo and not Kosova in English. The problem is that you are making a mess. Don't just move an entire article without talking it over on a talk page first, ok? Now, please stop, we need to discuss it first! Thanks --Dejan Cabrilo 01:37, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Do you accept UNMIK? Yes OR No?--Hipi Zhdripi 01:39, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Yes, I understand that Kosovo is now under UNMIK's administration, but what does that have to do with anything? I am asking you to please discuss things before you make a huge step of moving an entire article. Wikipedia is not a tool to spread political ideology, and we are trying to be collaborative community here. So please, don't move any more articles, don't change names, before we discussed it. I will be the first one to support using Albanian names when no English name is present, but let's discuss it all first. You are making a huge mess. Please, once again, please, let's discuss it all first. There is no need for you to "reform" entire Wikipedia tonight! --Dejan Cabrilo 01:45, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Do you accept UNMIK? Yes OR No?

I am not religious, and I don't believe in UNMIK as a diety, so I can accept it or not. What the hell does that question mean? My answer is: "I don't know, please clarify". --Dejan Cabrilo 01:52, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

UNMIK is United Nations Mission in Kosovo do you accept? Yes OR No? (accept and contract this is importen for Kosovo article)--Hipi Zhdripi 02:05, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I know what UNMIK is, but I still don't understand your question. Anyway, UNMIK is not an authoratative linguistic source that we have to follow. Please, add any material regarding UNMIK to the relevant articles. That would be great! But don't just do stuff without discussing it first. UNMIK is in Kosovo for now, and what they do and how they do their administration is good information, so ADD it to articles, don't modify entire articles to your believes. Once again, is it so demanding of me to ask you discuss stuff first? --Dejan Cabrilo 02:12, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Yes/No?--Hipi Zhdripi 02:17, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Once again, I don't know, since I don't understand the question. Put it in context if you want an answer. --Dejan Cabrilo 02:21, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Everybody,who doesn´t accept UNMIK , but is writing for kosovo, is just making propaganda. it has nothing to do with english language. With people like that, i don t need to have a discussion. If you are able to accept UNMIK, than we can have a discussion.--Hipi Zhdripi 02:29, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Do you accept UNMIK? Yes OR No?--Hipi Zhdripi 02:30, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Once again, I do not understand your question. Yes, I am fully aware of the fact that Kosovo is under UNMIK's administration. Does that help? Stop insisting on "Yes OR No". It's childish and it's counterproductive for discussion. Now, here is my proposal: go to United Nations Mission in Kosovo. Create a list of administrative units that they have. When you gather enough information about one of them, then create an article, which would clearly describe that administrative area, and would clearly note that the article in question is about such an administrative area. Does that sound good? --Dejan Cabrilo 02:39, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

You have answer

See my discussion page. Best regards, --M. Pokrajac 21:36, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

See another answer there. --M. Pokrajac 21:57, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo- Kosovo i Metohija and Republic of Kosovo

I am really sorry, but I have no idea what you are trying to say. I protected those pages in response to a posting on this page. The three pages are all about the same place and probably should be merged and redirected. If you like leave me another message and hopefully I will understand what you are asking of me. Best Wishes! Broken Segue 00:57, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Check after 85.70.52.185?

Could you please check Albania-related edits made by 85.70.52.185 (all of them)? Or ask someone else who knows history of the country.

All his edits related to Czech Republic were jokes or nonsense and this may be with Albania as well. Pavel Vozenilek 12:30, 15 May 2005 (UTC) 85.70.52.18585.70.52.18585.70.52.18585.70.52.18585.70.52.18585.70.52.18585.70.52.18585.70.52.18585.70.52.18585.70.52.18585.70.52.18585.70.52.185[reply]

Maps

Hi. You uploaded several Kosovo maps:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Kosovo_maps

They will delete your maps if you do not put a tag on them. If you draw these maps, then you can put them into "Public domain". If you do not know how to do this, you just ask me and I will put them into "Public domain", but I cant put them there if you do not agree with this. User:PANONIAN

[[:Image:Shepherd 526-600.jpg

There's no license or source, please add them or the image has to be deleted. --Saperaud 19:23, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. May I be of any assistence to you? P. S. What is that UMNIK problem??? respond on my page, please. HolyRomanEmperor 19:19, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. May I be of any assistence to you? P. S. What is that UMNIK problem??? respond on my page, please. HolyRomanEmperor 19:22, 29 October 2005 (UTC) Image:Shepherd 526-600.jpg[reply]

Serbophobia

Quote: "Hi, you can vote here about so called "Serbofobia" article. Serbofobia. It seems as I saw in sr wikipedia that Serbs are asking their membership to vote for the article which is based on propaganda. You can leave your opinion in above page...Thanks. --Emir Arven 16:11, 17 December 2005 (UTC)"--Albanian since Stone Age 19:27, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo/Kosova

Hi! I saw that you created several templates (and other stuff) with the Kosova name. As this is the name used by the majority of the local population, it wouldn't pose no problem if this wasn't the English wikipedia. But, due to internationalism policy, I will notify you to use Kosovo instead (the same situation would happen if someone uses Kosovan instead of Kosovar, although this one is actually being used in the world slightly) All the best! --HolyRomanEmperor 13:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Serb clans and List of Serbian monarchs

Wenn I read this articel, I was thinking Balkan is in Serbia. Sorry but Serbia is only a part of Balkan.

Rascia (Raška) it was a Bizantin Rulers Bosnia (Bosna) it was a Bizantin Rulers Doclea / Zeta it was a Bizantin Rulers Zahumlje / Hum it was a Bizantin Rulers Travunia (Travunja, Terbounia) it was a Bizantin Rulers Pagania / it was a Bizantin Rulers No one of this "Serbian monarchs" is Serb they belong to Bizant Rulers.--Hipi Zhdripi 14:09, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

and

Way Serb clans, hier are Montenegros and Albaniens clans? The Montenegro clans are not Serb clans??? --Hipi Zhdripi 13:46, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

They was orthodox clans bot not Serb clans. Is not so simply to say evry orthodox clans belong to Serb clans. They was part of Bizantin clans and not part of Serb clans.--Hipi Zhdripi 13:53, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Could you define what you meant here? Thanks in advance! --HolyRomanEmperor 14:23, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The name of the articel is wrong. --Hipi Zhdripi 02:12, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well - say why and suggest what could be better. --HolyRomanEmperor 15:29, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The name of the article is " Serbian monarchs ". There s written about montnegrian and albanian clans, which have been under byzantin empire. --Hipi Zhdripi 20:59, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Coolcat

Hi. I noticed that you voted in this RFA. Actually, that RFA closed last August. No more votes are being taken. User:Cool Cat is not currently running for admin on the English Wikipedia. However, he has requested adminship on the Wikimedia Commons: [4]. Did you mean to cast your vote there? Best, FreplySpang (talk) 21:05, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks--Hipi Zhdripi 21:09, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

?

The List of Serbian monarchs is refering to all the rulers who were Serbs as well as rulers whop ruled over the Serbs (regardless of their nationality).

The Serb Clans refers to the coastal clans. What did you mean? --HolyRomanEmperor 11:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong--Hipi Zhdripi 18:51, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About what - could you be more specific, please? --HolyRomanEmperor 20:12, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They are not Serbs. Is man from USA, Canadien or Mexikan?--Hipi Zhdripi 21:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But what persicely do you mean? Go to the list of Serbian rulers and tell me who/why should not be there! HolyRomanEmperor 09:44, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

??? --HolyRomanEmperor 21:40, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you...

If you find anything incorrect, you should state what; and not argue that it's incorrect like you're doing now... --HolyRomanEmperor 14:02, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A i kthen përgjigjet ti?

E pranoj UNMIK-un, kontaktom Aeternus 14:24, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oshtë interesant një gjë që nuk e prnon vetë ti shtishë të tjerët ta pranojnë. Une vetë nuk e pranojë po e zhfrytëzojë. hahah --Hipi Zhdripi 00:52, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tung Hipi Zhdripi

me kishe shkru ne faqe time. Cka me te ndihmu se nuk e kisha te qarte.flm tung,Ilir pz 21:14, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Po nuk po e kuptoi mirë përkufizimin e fjalës "Disctric". Po më duket se në bazë të përkufizimit mundemi me argumentua se nuk ka nevojë të lidhen artikujt mbi komunat dhe Kosovën me Serbin (së paku) as me SM.

Të lutem nëse ke mundësi ta vërtetosh nëse e kam të drejt. Nëse e vërteton se kam të drejt, mundemi me argumentua ashtu si po mendojë unë, atëherë Zhdripi e vazhdon punën që ti ndajë artikujt e Kosovës nga ata të Serbisë. Nëse jo atëherë Zhdripi duhet të pushojë për një kohë. Përndryshe do të ja ndalin punën Hipi Zhdripit dhe ajo nuk krijon një imigjë të mirë në përgjithësi në wikipediat. Hipit nuk ja ninë ai e vazhdon deri sa të ka kohë.

Deri tani i kam tërhequr "Distriktat e Millosheviqit" se ato kuqysh nuk bonë me konë ashtu sepse krahinat në kohen e tij nuk kanë ekzistua. Nëse dojin me i majt ata qashtu atëherë duhet me hekë gjitha artikujt të shënuar me Kosovën, Serbi se nuk është logjike. Ose është një krahinë autonome (atëherë Serbia nuk ka drejtë në vendosjen e qeverisjes lokale) ose nuk ekziston. Pasi që ajo nuk ekziston ato "Distrikte" mbesin si histori e Kosovës që janë përdorur nga administrata e Millosheviqit dhe nga ambasadat e SM në disa shtete të Evropës si "Distrikte" nën-tokë pas shpinës së UNMIKUT. shpresoj se nuk të lodha.

Upss! Jam duke provuar që ta krijojmë një bazë për këtë çështje që të ndërtojim një sistem për të gjitha gjuhët e Wikipedias. Ashtu që të mund të përcjellim zhvillimet. Mos harro për spiunazh as UDBA nuk u konë ma e fort se SIGURIMI, kemi traditë për mbledhjen e informatave por jo edhe për përdorimin e tyre.--Hipi Zhdripi 21:52, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tung Hipi. Te kisha keshillu me i lone faqen e tyne te Serbise mos me nguc njehere, e nese nuk ndalen tu na prishe faqen tone te Kosoves, atehere merremi vesh edhe marrim masa. Patjeter qe ato shenime ne ate faqe jane skandaloze. Na nuk duhet me leju qe ne faqen e Kosoves keta me na nguc. Besa disa edhe ne faqen per shqiptaret kane hi e po bejne dem. Une po mundohem sa po muj me i ndale disa. District dmth si ne Shqipni "bashkia" ose edhe ne Kosove si "komuna" . E verejta punen tende, per krijimin e wikiprojectit per Kosoven. Te pergezoj per punen. Do te mundohem me gjete kohe edhe me te ndihmu edhe aty, po per momentin duhet me i ndale keta pisa prej faqes, e as per ate spo kam kohe se jam tu mesu per shkolle.. Suksese, te pershendes,

Ilir pz 23:22, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gjithashtu Zhdripi, masi the qe mundesh me mbledhe informata, te lutem me dergo faqet e internetit cka gjen, ne anglisht mundesisht, edhe te kemi fakte, e une te ndihmoj me i argumentu ma sakte ne anglisht mandej, edhe jau marrim anen ne faqen e Kosoves.

Ilir pz 23:24, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pak si vonë e bona shka e pata njet. Po nuk munesh mi nalë vetem. Duhesh me gjetë "miq". E ata i gjonë në mesin e tyne. Edhe pse e di që ka me pasë probleme e bona tashti oshtë vonë. Po si do që të jetë e marrim veshë sa vetë janë aktiv. Ata me siguri ma mushin fleten tashti mu. Ku e ki emrin e malazezëve ti. Ti po dinë guhen e tyne. Mbrojë interesat e Malazezëve. --Hipi Zhdripi 23:29, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ide e mire ajo me i pa sa jane aktive. Nja tu ka lshu vec, po mos ju pergjigj hic e ai plas, vec jepja faktet e Kosoves si i dime ne, edhe si i pranon bashkesia nderkombetare, e deklaratat nacionaliste te tyne vec perbuzi. Nese me bjen rasti per me pa naj faqe per Malazez, do ta perkrahi, patjeter. Edhe ata kane te drejte me u pavarsu. flasim pra, Ilir pz 23:34, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Stop with Vandalismus

Did you mean Vandalism? Don't switch between Latin and English. :) And, I'm not deleting people's work, I am expanding articles. Also, see the talk page full of my arguements. What did you mean? --HolyRomanEmperor 16:13, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All you arguemts you can put in Serbians Mitologie. This candy of arguments are not acceptet from USA, UK and UN. --Hipi Zhdripi 16:52, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've been to the Free States of America and I just adore them. Most of the info that I upload is from the US of A. :) And the UN, well... just see the talk pages, most sources are UN. And for the British, except for my BBC sources, I can't see that the United Kingdom will do much good. :)))

Mozes li reci na sto si tacno mislio? --HolyRomanEmperor 18:26, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Im not interesin in personal war with you. Im locing for the Wikipedia als global project.--Hipi Zhdripi 18: 28, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Problem?

Hi, what is the problem with HolyRomanEmperor? What are the affected articles, can I help (make them NPOV only)? --NikX 18:40, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wat is that NPOV? I think they must work for Wikipedia and not for propaganda. They only use the projecte for Great Serbia Ide. They have maket the Montenegriner to serbs, the kosovars to serbs, the kosovas and montenegrines cultur to great serb cultur, they have put the montenegrin language dont xist for they, bosnjens language too. In wich time they Live. --Hipi Zhdripi 19:06, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I don't get you here... --HolyRomanEmperor 17:21, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your question

What exactly you asked me to do on my talk page? What is problem with that discussion? PANONIAN (talk) 18:51, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I asked you to make a {{Kosovo-stub}} and {{Kosovo-geo-stub}}.--Hipi Zhdripi 18:59, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

If you violate the three revert rule, sysops may block you for up to 24 hours. - Asterion 18:53, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Asterion 06:50, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. Sceptr e ^(Talk) 14:18, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The users account User:HolyRomanEmperor and User:Asterion are maken a community only too make the war edit. They dont let me to help in en:Wikipedia. They foil my planes for evry articel wich it has too do with Kosovo. They are not interested to do a work for Wikipedia, but to stopp and destroi my work in en:Wikipedia. They use the Three-revert rule police, I dont wont to make in hier another accont only to make war with this user.--Hipi Zhdripi 02:25, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

   Really? I would like to discuss; but none do... Does that make that? --HolyRomanEmperor 17:18, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Well you can avoid the "Three-revert rule police" by not edit warring. If there is a dispute look to the dispute resolution pages to see what assistance can be given. If you keep just trying to edit war you'll find you get blocked for breaking WP:3RR --pgk^(talk) 21:04, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They are maken a edit war, and sombody block my accont.--Hipi Zhdripi 00:48, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But I didt make any war. I dont anderstand wat is hapen here. You cann see the edit war hier is:--Hipi Zhdripi 00:48, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ur) (last) 23:57, 10 April 2006 Asterion (Revert to revision dated 23:13, 10 April 2006 by Khoikhoi, oldid 47869577 using popups)
(cur) (last) 23:23, 10 April 2006 Ilir pz (rv Khoikhoi's unilateral edit, without discussing. Thank you!)
(cur) (last) 23:13, 10 April 2006 Khoikhoi m (Reverted edits by 158.143.162.251 (Talk) to last version by Findmonkey)
(cur) (last) 21:47, 10 April 2006 158.143.162.251 (nonen e shkive)
(cur) (last) 17:13, 10 April 2006 Findmonkey (→Pro-Serbian)
(cur) (last) 06:49, 10 April 2006 Asterion (Revert to revision dated 12:29, 9 April 2006 by Asterion, oldid 47691303 using popups)
(cur) (last) 18:52, 9 April 2006 158.143.162.251 (rv)
(cur) (last) 12:29, 9 April 2006 Asterion (Revert to revision dated 01:11, 9 April 2006 by HolyRomanEmperor, oldid 47631254 using popups)
(cur) (last) 02:43, 9 April 2006 Hipi Zhdripi (The User talk:HolyRomanEmperor is thinking that this articel is his prsonal use page)
(cur) (last) 01:11, 9 April 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m (→Unrest in Kosovo - plural)
(cur) (last) 01:09, 9 April 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m (→Ottomans - Albanians are part of Kosovo's historical heritage too; section renamed)
(cur) (last) 01:07, 9 April 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (→Medieval - The arrival of Serbs and the unified Serbian Lands - removing a section that has no connection to Kosovo and adding a river)
(cur) (last) 01:04, 9 April 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (→Medieval - The arrival of Serbs and the unified Serbian Lands - rephrasing the description of the picture slightly)
(cur) (last) 01:03, 9 April 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (→Medieval - The arrival of Serbs and the unified Serbian Lands - picture of Dechani added and the Dechani Charter)
(cur) (last) 01:00, 9 April 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m (→Serbian Empire - section renamed to proper historical accords)
(cur) (last) 00:37, 9 April 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (rv the mass removal/vandalism; please use the talk page; thank you)
(cur) (last) 22:54, 8 April 2006 Hipi Zhdripi
(cur) (last) 22:54, 8 April 2006 Hipi Zhdripi
(cur) (last) 22:52, 8 April 2006 Hipi Zhdripi (In Kosovo are monternigren)
(cur) (last) 21:51, 8 April 2006 Ilir pz m
(cur) (last) 19:08, 8 April 2006 158.143.214.137 (rv)
(cur) (last) 17:03, 8 April 2006 Asterion (RV unexplained deletion of relevant text. Back to last version by Litany)
(cur) (last) 16:35, 8 April 2006 Dardanv
(cur) (last) 16:30, 8 April 2006 Dardanv (links)
(cur) (last) 15:59, 8 April 2006 Asterion (Revert to revision dated 09:50, 8 April 2006 by Litany, oldid 47533726 using popups)
(cur) (last) 14:36, 8 April 2006 Dardanv
(cur) (last) 12:35, 8 April 2006 Dardanv
(cur) (last) 09:50, 8 April 2006 Litany (history addings and corrections)
(cur) (last) 02:47, 8 April 2006 Asterion (Revert to revision dated 00:07, 7 April 2006 by Cookiecaper, oldid 47330167 using popups)
(cur) (last) 01:15, 8 April 2006 Zeri YT (→Pro-Albanian)
(cur) (last) 01:12, 8 April 2006 Zeri YT (→Pro-Albanian)
(cur) (last) 00:07, 7 April 2006 Cookiecaper (Revert to revision 47296821 using popups)
(cur) (last) 00:07, 7 April 2006 69.119.195.171 (fuck serbians)
(cur) (last) 19:56, 6 April 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (→Ottomans - and some more info)
(cur) (last) 19:49, 6 April 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (→Yugoslavia and fascist Albania - some more info & corrections)
(cur) (last) 18:53, 6 April 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (→See also - two more See also links added)
(cur) (last) 18:48, 6 April 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (→Ancient - Macedonia)
(cur) (last) 18:44, 6 April 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m (→Transitional Presidents - List of)
(cur) (last) 18:43, 6 April 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m (→Prime Ministers - List)
(cur) (last) 18:42, 6 April 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (→Presidents - transitional until the dispute is finished)
(cur) (last) 18:40, 6 April 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m (→Geography - some Grammar & other-type corrections)
(cur) (last) 18:39, 6 April 2006 Estavisti (→Yugoslavia and fascist Albania)
(cur) (last) 18:39, 6 April 2006 Estavisti m (→Unrest in Kosovo)
(cur) (last) 18:38, 6 April 2006 Estavisti (→Kosovar unrests)
(cur) (last) 18:37, 6 April 2006 Estavisti (→= The arrival of Serbs and the unified Serbian Lands)
(cur) (last) 18:28, 6 April 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m (→Yugoslavia and fascist Albania - some more)
(cur) (last) 18:22, 6 April 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (→Restoration of Serbian rule - moving to the appropriate & some minor changes)
(cur) (last) 18:08, 6 April 2006 Jecowa m (→History - wikified "vassal" where it was first mentioned; changed "attemps" to "attempts")
(cur) (last) 18:08, 6 April 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m (→External links - external links fixed)
(cur) (last) 18:05, 6 April 2006 HolyRomanEmpe

=/

cur) (last) 23:43, 10 April 2006 Asterion (Revert to revision dated 21:39, 10 April 2006 by Ilir_pz, oldid 47857009 using popups)
(cur) (last) 23:42, 10 April 2006 Asterion (Revert to revision dated 14:16, 10 April 2006 by Sceptre, oldid 47802393 using popups)
(cur) (last) 21:39, 10 April 2006 Ilir pz (Serbian flag is not flag of Kosovo. Status of Kosovo is not determined. Thanks!)
(cur) (last) 14:16, 10 April 2006 Sceptre m (Reverted edits by Ilir pz (talk) to last version by Asterion)
(cur) (last) 19:10, 9 April 2006 Ilir pz (refrain from nationalism please. Kosovo is represented by the UN flag internationally. Don't vandalize here, like elsewhere, Asterion.Thanks!)
(cur) (last) 18:15, 9 April 2006 Asterion (Revert to revision dated 17:53, 9 April 2006 by Asterion, oldid 47723511 using popups)
(cur) (last) 18:00, 9 April 2006 Hipi Zhdripi
(cur) (last) 17:53, 9 April 2006 Asterion (Revert to revision dated 12:39, 9 April 2006 by Asterion, oldid 47692205 using popups)
(cur) (last) 17:41, 9 April 2006 Hipi Zhdripi
(cur) (last) 12:39, 9 April 2006 Asterion (reverting to last factual, NPOV, version)
(cur) (last) 02:21, 9 April 2006 Hipi Zhdripi (see: Template talk:Kosovo)
(cur) (last) 00:54, 9 April 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (rv to the version of User:Asterion with slight changes)
(cur) (last) 18:36, 8 April 2006 Hipi Zhdripi (officele versione, Kosovo has no flag, th only officele flag is the UN flag if you put the serbien flag you most put dhe albanien flag)
(cur) (last) 17:53, 8 April 2006 Hipi Zhdripi (Peć District it was during the Milloshevic era but nothing more)
(cur) (last) 19:18, 6 April 2006 Asterion (Revert to revision 47005227 using popups)
(cur) (last) 12:59, 6 April 2006 Ilir pz m
(cur) (last) 09:11, 6 April 2006 Ilir pz (change to comply with UN approved Constitutional Framework of Kosova. check talk page)
(cur) (last) 23:37, 4 April 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m (a flag corrected)
(cur) (last) 19:20, 4 April 2006 Asterion (Revert to revision dated 07:05, 3 April 2006 by Asterion, oldid 46710902 using popups)
(cur) (last) 19:20, 4 April 2006 Asterion (vprotected)
(cur) (last) 19:18, 4 April 2006 Asterion (Revert to revision dated 07:05, 3 April 2006 by Asterion, oldid 46710902 using popups)
(cur) (last) 10:26, 4 April 2006 Ilir pz m (English/Albanian/Serbian naming fixed. Kosovo has no flag as of now, so removed.)
(cur) (last) 07:05, 3 April 2006 Asterion (Albanian names)
(cur) (last) 07:01, 3 April 2006 Asterion
(cur) (last) 20:16, 2 April 2006 Bormalagurski m
(cur) (last) 12:00, 25 March 2006 Asterion (Remove UNMIK from template and created fresh one for this)
(cur) (last) 19:06, 19 December 2005 Alexan es m (png ------>svg)
(cur) (last) 13:26, 25 November 2005 HolyRomanEmperor

/

Template talk:Kosovo From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search

I have edited the article to include International/Serbian and Albanian names and corrected its description to Province of Serbia under United Nations administration. This should satisfy everyone (who behaves rationally). Templates are meant to be an information tool, not more fodder for edit wars or to "reflect the hopes" of any group. Regards, Asterion 07:12, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

       And this satisfies everyone because it satisfies you? who are you to judge what is rational and what is not? I thought that was very subjective. The template should reflect the UNMIK official administration publications, not claims of the Serbian govt. regards,2Ilir pz 09:21, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks HolyRomanEmperor for your last contribution to the template, I think the current state of the template is the most NPOV option. It reflects the UN administration and does not belittle the fact that Kosovo is a province of Serbia. I will also suggest to list Template:Kosova for deletion and/or automatically redirecting it here. You must note that User:Ilir pz has been busy changing the template mentions on most of the Kosovo articles, therefore any agreement we reach in this template would be pointless as the article would be showing his "Kosova" template instead. I have been trying to get that one fixed too but, I reckon, the most sensible solution would be to get rid of the Template:Kosova altogether and use the current NPOV version of this template. Well, all this depending on our friend Ilir's behaviour and reaction on the matter, both of which I presume will be negative. Whether we should try to reach consensus with someone, who has proven in the past not open to dialogue, is the quid of the question. Regards, Asterion 06:05, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

           The current version is more neutral. The official name of Kosovo is put first, without Metohija. Then Albanian version as it is alphabetically first, and then the Serbian version. Thanks for judging my behavior instead, Asterion. Yours is to be proud of, you are doing mass vandalism anywhere any topic has to do with Albanians, and reverting. I am going to have you under my binoculars, and start a very careful arbitration case, as this is too much from your side. Kosova IS a territory under UN administration. And not for a long time. If you don't like this, and do not want to respect the official approved documents of UN in Kosova, such as the constitutional framework, then it is your problem. I am only citing from there. [1]. No need to revert, as I will do the same, and my revert is based on an internationally accepted documents, yours is on nationalism, and dreams of returning Kosova under the Serbian rule again. Ilir pz 09:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

   Uh... Why do you hate the name Metohija so much, Ilir pz? --HolyRomanEmperor 00:52, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

I like the name Metohia, but hier is wrong place. Hier is the oficele use in UN accepted verzion from serbien language in K osovo: http://www.unmikonline.org/regulations/unmikgazette/04serbian/SC2000regs/RSC2000_43.pdf

UREDBA BR. 2000/43 UNMIK/URED/2000/43 27. jul 2000. godine O BROJU, IMENIMA I GRANICAMA OP[TINA Specijalni predstavnik Generalnog sekretara, Shodno ovla{}ewu koje mu je dato Rezolucijom Saveta bezbednosti Ujediwenih nacija 1244 (1999) od 10. juna 1999. godine, Na osnovu Uredbe br. 1999/1 od 25. jula 1999. godine Privremene administrativne misije Ujediwenih nacija na Kosovu (UNMIK), sa izmenama i dopunama, o ovla{}ewima Privremene uprave na Kosovu i na osnovu Uredbe UNMIK-a br. 2000/24 od 12. decembra 2000. godine o zakonu koji je u primeni na Kosovu, (hier is oficele user) U ciqu razja{wavawa broja, imena, oblasti i granica op{tina pre odr`avawa op{tinskih izbora na Kosovu, Ovim objavquje slede}e: ^lan 1 BROJ I IMENA OP[TINA 1.1 Kosovo ima trideset op{tina kao {to je dato u Tabeli A u dodatku ovoj Uredbi. 1.2 Zvani~na komunikacija ne mo`e da sadr`i bilo koje ime za op{tinu koje nije naziv odre|en u Tabeli A ove Uredbe, osim u onim op{tinama gde etni~ke i jezi~ke zajednice, koje nisu srpske i albanske ~ine znatan deo stanovni{tva, gde se imena op{tina daju i na jezicima tih zajednica. ^lan 2 PODRU^JA I GRANICE OP[TINA Podru~je svake op{tine i wene granice su ocrtane wenim sastavnim katastarskim zonama. Katastarske zone koje ~ine svaku op{tinu su odre|ene u Tabeli B prilo`enoj u dodatku ovoj Uredbi. ^lan 3 PRIMENA Specijalni predstavnik Generalnog sekretara mo`e da donese administrativno uputstvo u vezi sa primenom ove Uredbe. ^ ^lan 4 ZAKON KOJI JE U PRIMENI Ova Uredba zamewuje svaku odredbu zakona koji je u primeni a koja nije saglasna sa wom. ^lan 5 STUPAWE NA SNAGU Ova Uredba stupa na snagu 27. jula 2000. godine. Bernar Ku{ner Specijalni predstavnik Generalnog sekretara

RASPORED A IMENA OP[TINA Albanski Srpski 01 Deçan De~ani 02 Gjakovë \akovica 03 Gllogovc Glogovac 04 Gjilan Gwilane 05 Dragash Draga{ 06 Istog Istok 07 Kaçanik Ka~anik 08 Klinë Klina 09 Fushë Kosovë Kosovo Poqe 10 Kamenicë Kamenica 11 Mitrovicë Kosovska Mitrovica 12 Leposaviq Leposavi} 13 Lipjan Lipqan 14 Novobërdë Novo Brdo 15 Obiliq Obili} 16 Rahovec Orahovac 17 Pejë Pe} 18 Podujevë Podujevo 19 Prishtinë Pri{tina 20 Prizren Prizren 21 Skenderaj Srbica 22 Shtime [timqe 23 Shtërpcë [trpce 24 Suharekë Suva Reka 25 Ferizaj Uro{evac 26 Viti Vitina 27 Vushtrri Vu~itrn 28 Zubin Potok Zubin Potok 29 Zveçan Zve~an 30 Malishevë Mali{evo

Sorry but only this version is accepted from UN. They don t accepted Republika e Kosovës, Kosmet, State of Kosova, Kosovo and Metohija or somthing als. Becose that I think that you must writte only Kosovo. This is not Serbian Wikipedia, hier is english wikipedia and the only version is UN --Hipi Zhdripi 01:48, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Contents [hide]

   * 1 Komuna/Opstina
   * 2 Albanian POV pushers
   * 3 Before you make the rev.
   * 4 Whether you like it or not...

[edit]

Komuna/Opstina

http://www.unmikonline.org/regulations/unmikgazette/03albanian/A2000regs/RA2000_45.pdf

http://www.unmikonline.org/regulations/unmikgazette/04serbian/SC2000regs/RSC2000_45.pdf

PRIVREMENE INSTITUCIJE 1.1 Do odredjivawa bududjeg statusa Kosova, ova Uredba, u skladu Rezolucijom 1244 Saveta bezbednosti Ujediwenih nacija, uspostavqa privremene institucije za demokratsku i autonomnu samoupravu na op{tinskom nivou kao korak ka postepenom prenosu administrativnih nadle`nosti Privremene administrativne misije Ujediwenih nacija na Kosovu (UNMIK- koja }e nadgledati i pru`ati podr{ku konsolidaciji ovih institucija.

I think if you accept like the serbs in Kosovo accept this document that you are going to anderstuden that the onl law in Kosovo is the UNMIK-law til = Do odredjivawa the statut of Kosovo is determined. Because of this argument I must return the page in my verzion.--Hipi Zhdripi 02:19, 9 April 2006 (UTC) [edit]

Albanian POV pushers

The territory is a province of Serbia under United Nations administration, in the Resolution 1244 (1999), adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 10 June 1999[2], the UN reafirmed its commitment to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (and its sucessor state, the Union of Serbia and Montenegro, after the country changed its name). I am, therefore, reverting to the last factual version. Remember this is not a forum but an encyclopedia (and by the way this is not the Albanian wikipedia, therefore stick to English and Internationally recognised names). Regards, Asterion 06:33, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Is not a tertitory in Serbia. Is Territory in SR Serbia. And Serbia is a territory in SR Serbia. http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N01/298/89/PDF/N0129889.pdf?OpenElement Welcoming the steps taken by the Government of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to consolidate a multiethnic society within its borders, and expressing its full support for the further development of this process, Also welcoming the plan put forward by the Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia to resolve peacefully the crisis in certain municipalities in southern Serbia (Preseva, Bujanoc ect, after Kosovo War it was war in this citys and i Macedonia), and expressing encouragement for the implementation of political and economic reforms designed to reintegrate the ethnic Albanian population as full members of civil society,

Welcoming international efforts, including those of the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo, the International security presence in Kosovo (KFOR), the European Union, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in cooperation with the Governments of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and other States, to prevent the escalation of ethnic tensions in the area,

http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N99/172/89/PDF/N9917289.pdf?OpenElement

Determined to resolve the grave humanitarian situation in Kosovo, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, and to provide for the safe and free return of all refugees and displaced persons to their homes, 1. STEP (a) Promoting the establishment, pending a final settlement, of substantial autonomy and self-government in Kosovo, taking full account of annex 2 and of the Rambouillet accords (S/1999/648); 2. STEP (a) Promoting the establishment, pending a final settlement, of substantial autonomy and self-government in Kosovo, taking full account of annex 2 and of the Rambouillet accords (S/1999/648); 3. STEP (e) Facilitating a political process designed to determine Kosovo’s future status, taking into account the Rambouillet accords (S/1999/648);

           Hier is referendum for kosovars they have joseit "intependent" ths most be acceptit from Serbia.
           The bound Serbia Montenegro must bee accepti by the kosovars
           This is going to be clean in Wien. They have worikit in two seits.

(d) Transferring, as these institutions are established, its administrative responsibilities while overseeing and supporting the consolidation of Kosovo’s local provisional institutions and other peacebuilding activities;

The point(d) how you can see is the key poin. If this point was not includet, UN must accepte Kosovo as state (see Kosovars Referedum they have diseitet vor independent).

Becose of thet Kosovo is non status area. UN accepte the righ oft the Yogusllav integrite and accepte the will of the Kosovars (Referendum). Also, in Wien they must dieset wat is goig too be. Till this time Kosovo hase non status and is provinc in Balkan (see UNMIK) it belong not to Kosovars and not to the Serbia it is in Air. If we pot the serbien flag ther, then t maning that thet Kosovo is provice of Serbia thet is not acceptet from nobody in UN. Kosovo is Kosovars Provinc in Balkan unter the UNMIK Administration. Kosovos representin flag in the outseid with the athers stats (SM, Macedonia, Albania ...) is the UN flag not Serbans flag. Hier we mos present the flag unter wich Kosovo is talkin with the memeber of the UN.--Hipi Zhdripi 17:35, 9 April 2006 (UTC) [edit]

Before you make the rev.

Finde out the document in wicht Kosovo is representit today in the UN (our samwer els), unter the Serbian Flag.--Hipi Zhdripi 17:44, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Unter the UN flag the make the that. If Kosovo is going to user the flag of Serbia then Im going to chanche, my self. Till that s not, we are goig to let only the UN flag.--Hipi Zhdripi 17:49, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

       The onus is on you. Kosovo and Metohija is a province of Serbia, which was part of the FR of Yugoslavia, whose new name is Union of Serbia and Montenegro. Whether you like it or not, Kosovo is part of Serbia. End of the argument. Asterion 17:53, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

       My fried you are maken a mistek. Serbia is not mining SR Serbia.--Hipi Zhdripi 17:59, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

       Serbia is not a state.--Hipi Zhdripi 18:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

UN Security Council Resolution S/RES/1244(1999) of 2 June 1999 (S/1999/649, annex 2 to this resolution)

       [The UN] reafirming the commitment of all Member States to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the other States of the region

Regards,Asterion 19:05, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

A kind remark, Asterion!!! Stop reverting the flag with Serbia's flag. You wouldn't like if we edit in Serbian wiki pages, would you? so please leave sites that have to do with Kosovo and Albanians alone, and don't vandalize, before it is too late. Ilir pz 19:11, 9 April 2006 (UTC) [edit]

Whether you like it or not...

...The truth is that this is an encyclopedia. Whatever your feelings are, Kosovo is not an independent territory but a province of Serbia, part of the Union of Serbia and Montenegro, under transitory administration by the United Nations. If you are unfamiliar with the Security Council resolution on the matter, please refer to previous mention above. You might be frustated with reality but please understand that this is not a political forum. Regards, Asterion 06:47, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

           you are so understanding of the situation. you keep amazing me every day. I am not impressed by your words here at all, as i know what actions you take behind this "understanding" you show here. Pretty used to this kind of triple-faced actions, have lived more than a decade under Serbian occupation. You seem to think and work exactly as those you sympathize (read SPS)Ilir pz 10:49, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Non status area

Kosovo is non status are. It is under the UN control till they determined the satatut.

http://www.unmikonline.org/regulations/unmikgazette/03albanian/A2000regs/RA2000_45.pdf

http://www.unmikonline.org/regulations/unmikgazette/04serbian/SC2000regs/RSC2000_45.pdf

PRIVREMENE INSTITUCIJE 1.1 Do odredjivawa bududjeg statusa Kosova, ova Uredba, u skladu Rezolucijom 1244 Saveta bezbednosti Ujediwenih nacija, uspostavqa privremene institucije za demokratsku i autonomnu samoupravu na op{tinskom nivou kao korak ka postepenom prenosu administrativnih nadle`nosti Privremene administrativne misije Ujediwenih nacija na Kosovu (UNMIK- koja }e nadgledati i pru`ati podr{ku konsolidaciji ovih institucija.

I think if you accept like the serbs in Kosovo accept this document that you are going to anderstuden that the onl law in Kosovo is the UNMIK-law til = Do odredjivawa the statut of Kosovo is determined.

As I said previously, Kosovo is a province of Serbia under United Nations administration, in the Resolution 1244 (1999), adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 10 June 1999 [18][19], the UN reafirmed its commitment to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (and its sucessor state, the Union of Serbia and Montenegro, after the country changed its name). Anything else is just wishful thinking on your side.

Anyone with some knowledge on International Law is aware that Serbia does not have a separate foreign policy (now and when it was part of the FRY), this is left in the hands of the federal government. Therefore, the UN would not deal directly with Serbia or Montenegro, in the same way that it wouldn't do with Scotland separately if a problem were to arise in the UK. I understand that English is not your native language, as neither is mine, but could you at least use a spellchecker? It is very hard to follow your line of thoughts. Also, please stop using Albanian and Serbo-Croatian language in the talk pages, as you are probably aware that this is the English language wikipedia and your actions could be understood as disrespectful for wikipedians who do not master those languages. Regards, Asterion 13:45, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

You are maken a mistet. That wath you are saying is the Serbien Law but, not the International Law. Give me a clean document from the UN (International Law) in wich is standin Kosovo is the Serbian provinc. I can give yua the docment from UN (International Law) in wich is : Kosovo is a Provinc in Balkan.--Hipi Zhdripi 18:19, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

You can take alle that an put in the Serbians inteprataton for (International Law)--Hipi Zhdripi 18

   23, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar

...Uhh... Thank you? Sorry, but I don't understand that barnstar... --HolyRomanEmperor 17:27, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see the Petar II Petrović Njegoš article. All the best! --HolyRomanEmperor 17:40, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Petar_II_Petrovi%C4%87_Njego%C5%A1&action=history . That is your work. You are a serb. I can t anderstande way you are usen thin user name Holy Roman Emperor. Thit is ony a maske.--Hipi Zhdripi 17:47, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(cur) (last) 22:52, 15 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m (→Works - corr.)
(cur) (last) 22:51, 15 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (→Major works - expanding (quotations rm, now irrelevant))
(cur) (last) 22:43, 15 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (→Life - expanding and re-writing)
(cur) (last) 20:50, 15 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m (→External links - rm ruler table (already present, unnecessary repetition))
(cur) (last) 03:26, 15 March 2006 Kelly Martin m (correct spelling, tidy, and general clean up using AWB)
(cur) (last) 18:59, 14 March 2006 Dijxtra (→Life - disambig)
(cur) (last) 09:05, 12 March 2006 Missmarple m (→Life - fix a link)
(cur) (last) 22:19, 11 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (→Major works - written 4 years earlier...)
(cur) (last) 17:48, 11 March 2006 Bogsat (→Life - removed a link)
(cur) (last) 16:07, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor
(cur) (last) 16:06, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m
(cur) (last) 16:05, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (birthplace image)
(cur) (last) 16:00, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (→Life - finishing)
(cur) (last) 15:59, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (→Life - another citation)
(cur) (last) 15:53, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m (→Major works - Serbian names)
(cur) (last) 15:49, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor
(cur) (last) 15:46, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m (→Life)
(cur) (last) 15:45, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (→Life)
(cur) (last) 15:35, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m (→Major works)
(cur) (last) 15:35, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor
(cur) (last) 15:32, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m (→See also)
(cur) (last) 15:30, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (→Quotes (Serbian) - ruler tag)
(cur) (last) 15:24, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m (→Quotes (Serbian))
(cur) (last) 15:23, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m (→Quotes (English))
(cur) (last) 15:22, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m (→Life)
(cur) (last) 15:20, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (→Major works - works)
(cur) (last) 15:04, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m (→See also - link corrected)
(cur) (last) 15:01, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (→Quotes (Serbian) - see also)
(cur) (last) 14:52, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m (→Life - rm)
(cur) (last) 14:48, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor (→Life - expanding greatly)
(cur) (last) 14:14, 10 March 2006 HolyRomanEmperor m

You are wrilly pro serbs you are presenting the all Ballkan is Serbia. What the hell has to do Njegos with Belgrad?--Hipi Zhdripi 20:06, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If Njgosh was a live now, you must number you minuts. Imagen to say to Njegosh you are serb, Only imagen. It the same to say to Lekë Dugagjini or Ibrahim Rugova you are Serb.--Hipi Zhdripi 20:11, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Block.

I didn't block you. You were blocked by Sceptre (2006-04-10 14:16:33 Sceptre blocked "Hipi Zhdripi (contribs)" with an expiry time of 24 hours (3RR violation)) Please note, if you edit anything under User:172.180.13.109 it will be blocked as well. — xaosflux ^Talk 01:17, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He has been editing under that IP address: See here, here and here. Please, let me know if you can do anything about it. Regards, Asterion 01:32, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here we go, inspector Sherlock Asterion again, pointing his finger to whomever disagrees with him. Typical. Ilir pz 19:48, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hipi kujdes

Kujdes o Hipi se ta pamundesojne hyrjen keta pisa, a pe sheh? hiqu faqes se tyne ne Serbia e mos i pengo. T'i presim edhe pak, qe hine me te madhe e na vandalizojne faqen e Kosoves i lshohemi se bashku. Mos ju jep shanse me te blloku. As mos harxho kohe me ju spjegu shume ketyne, se te poshter jane nuk e kane ndermend me na ndegju faktet tona. Nuk kam shume kohe me u marre me faqen e tyne, te kshilloj edhe ty mos me hupe kohe. Me respekt, Ilir pz 19:51, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Po a po mendonë se është puna e fakteve a. Këtu është puna me i mbledhë ata që janë aktiv. Edhe në tjetren anë me ju blloku atyre fleten. Hipi e ka ndërmen të ju bëjë një ftesë disa administratorëve që të merren me këtë punë. Si ta marrish ashtu si po mendojin ata njanë anë me qitë Serbin pa Kosovën e tjetren Kosovën me shti në Serbi nuk bonë. kjo nuk është reale dhe mund të shifet nga administratorët tjerë fare thjeshtë. Une e diqë në fund të fundit deri tani ata e kanë dominu fleten e Kosovës por duhet të ju qesim punë në fletat e tyre. E kemi më lehtë se ata aty duhet me i mrojtë. Na kështu e ashtu fletat e kosovës nuk mujim me i ndreqë. Vetëm nëse lodhen aa tu i ndreq të vetat. A munesh më tregu diçka për këtë rregullen që më ka blloku mua sstemi: 3rr.--Hipi Zhdripi 19:58, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply Kosovo

What?? It makes no sense. Litany

Njegos

OK, then. You can speak some Serbian language, right?

Please (I beg you know), download this (greatest) book of Njegos: Gorski vijenac --HolyRomanEmperor 21:09, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo

I understand your arguments about Kosovo, but according to the constitutional chapter of Serbia and Montenegro, Kosovo is defined as part of Serbia. I also know that 1244 resolution does not mention Serbia at all, but to which of these two documents we will trust? I do not care what will be future status of Kosovo, but its current status is pretty confusing, thus, until the final status is not defined, both definitions about Kosovo status are correct. It is equally correct to say that Kosovo is part of Serbia as to say that it is not. The whole question about this is to which of the 2 documents we will trust: to 1244 resolution or to Serbia-Montenegro constitutional chapter. I am not expert for that, so, there is no use to discuss that with me. PANONIAN (talk) 22:40, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about my english

Becose that all the articel for kosovo must be I dont now how to say beter "Singel" without mothing alls only UNMIK. Her we have do do with one state wich is in UN paper, this state is Yogoslavia (with 8 elements) they element names are 6 republiks and two "Pokraina" is trasiletet to province but one province (in westen) dont have the rigt to represent the state. The Yougoslavien Law for presidet of Yougoslavia after titos says: 2 years for ech Federal konstruktiv element. Also Slobodan Milosevic wantit to uset the right of "VOTE" and "VETO" from thre federal elements. That was anacceptebel from Sllovenia and Kroacia. S.Millosevic after he dident hae the chanche to take the Kosovo "VOTO" and "VETO" have maket a putch in Prishtinas parliament. This is the point in wich the UN is sayin to the Serbia that Serbia in Soc. Fed. Rep. of Jug. it was like Kosovo, with the same right to "VOTO" and "VETO", but in ather said. The teritory of Serbia befor the putsch (is not 2006 Serbia) and the to so called Auto. Pokr. has maket a Federation, union the UN don hawe the name about this cand of bund. This was the work from Kardel (Tito best friend). After the puscht in prishtinas parliament ther was nothin in kosovo but the Yogoslaw law says that the parlamen kann be only distrode without force. The Kosovars they diden acceptit the Milosevic and they called the UN to protect they right in Yogoslawien Law because the Yogoslawie is not existin anymore. The UN is playin the role like the Yogoslawien Law and has declaredt this provice in bakan, becose UN is not the contry but the Yoguslavien Law is presentin in paper a country wich in reality dont exist. Becouse that the UNMIK in Kosovo use the term to in ech dokument wich has to do with explanien the Kosovo status

Kosovo is a provinc in Balkan (sometimes west Balkan) and the representing flag of the Kosovo is UN flag.
In the other side the UN is toleriating the Serbia to make and finde the way to exist (maken ekonomy with the ather stats). Not prosperet but only to exist for the humen riesens.
Way Republica Serbia dont hawe rigt to make the agreement with auther states (not it this has to do with justice also "de juro" and is not meeanig "de facto")? You can intepret man document how you wont but that is not the true and has mor to do with politik, and hase nothing to do with UN justic. I hawe seen her sambody says that Kosovo ist "de juro" serbian par (after my resarch and a gjerman avokat,say : in fact Kosovo ist "de juro" in Jugoslavian and together with Serbian and Vojvodina makes another bound called RS of Serbia). To explan you better. In one gather as 8 houses ech oun has one input door. and thre of them has boundin with two doors. You have in Yogosllawia 8 parliaments (is not 6 dont forget, for justice that is meaning the representatives of the state because the Kosovo has his oun teritorian army (teritorialna odbrana kosovo/alb.: Mbrojtja Teriatoriale e Krahinës Autonome të Kosovës )). Prishtinas parliament (Kuvendi today Parliamenti i Kosovës) in ech segmet has the same right like parliament in Belgrad. And the president of Soc. Rep. of Serbia most be acceptet from thre parliaments. In another casse it measn meeting and meeting till the finde the soulution. This is called in med. alb: PARALIZ -A -IMI, (i dont no the english wort for that). That is happen today. Till they don finde the soulution (Belgrand and Prishtina) all this RS of Serbia is going to exist for UN but not Serbia. If they tolerait Serbia to exist than they say that Kosovo is a province in Balkan. And they meet together in SFR of Yogosllavia. Every thing alls has nothing to do with the UN Law but is or stupit, or propagander, from sam children wich dont know that in kosovo was war betwen the Kosovars and the Serbs (they thing that the war was agains Albania, beacose Albania has trait to occupet the Hard of Sebia) But a cann anderstand that, is goin to comm out suner or latter. Because that Im more woit abaot Wikipedia, my dream it was to be Wikipedia preparet for the chanchis. And if sombody, how has a minimum intelegenc is seenig tha the Serb seit are full of propagander and stupit things. Hier I am talkin not only abot articel wich has to do with albaners--Hipi Zhdripi 02:07, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The resultet of vienne is going to be Kosovo indenpenden without any money for the agresion from Begrads parliament. For Kosovos parliament is more easy because the folk (they hawe looset so much) is behand they.

Belgrad parliament is going to be free from "block out situatsion" or "status quo" and dont have to paye the demages. Is wery, wery kritical they most at first axplain the folk wat it was. But the politikens are politekens.

For as ist better to late the Sebians aricels laik they are, but withot Kosovos citys or somthing like this. In the artike in wich is wrotit about Yogoslavia, we must put sam explens about the Relation Belgrad-Prishtina. Not it is not Prishtinas parliament (kosovas) albanain paliament is Kosovars Parliament. The artikel about the Rashka, Deqani,... and Church and the culture of the kosovars (serb) mus be chois fron the kosovars (orthosox and serbs) if they wont to put unter the Kosovos cultur is O.K. The (kosovo) albaners they dont have nothing agains this church (not it! they dont consider this church als serbien church, but als bisantin churche). Is only the heat i moment a but the prister wich are sayin that this is the serbiens church. This church has loost his folk vor 100 year--Hipi Zhdripi 02:07, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What did you mean when you said not it! they dont consider this church als serbien church, but als bisantin churche

Also, did you see: http://users.net.yu/~lrakovic/gorski_vijenac.exe ? I want to hear your opinion on it.

Can you speak the Serbian language? --HolyRomanEmperor 20:30, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hipi mos e hap kete adresen siper ketu qe ta ka shkru, se mundet me ta demtu kompjuterin. Kujdes!!! Ilir pz 23:03, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FLMN--Hipi Zhdripi 23:11, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hipi, durohu pak mos hup kohe me keta pisa, po gjej artikuj te forte e i publikojme bashke. Te pershendes, Ilir pz 09:53, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Çubroloviqi

Duhet me gjetë diku atë planin që e ka bo Çubroloviqi për kolonizimin e Kosovës dhe me hapë një artikel.--Hipi Zhdripi 09:57, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

tung Hipi, qe ketu e ki [5], faqe 46. Ilir pz 10:22, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Note that I would like to discuss with you. I feel that the main problem between us is the error caused by your, respectivly, bad English. I asked your if you understand Serbo-Croatian better than English so that we can communicate much more easily. --HolyRomanEmperor 13:34, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

O hipi

pse e ke bo kete ndryshim he burre? a gabim a me qellim? [6], Ilir pz 22:28, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kqyre në fleten e diskutimit ashtë përgjegjja në krye të fletës ku shkunë se kush e ka pregatit artikullin. Ka qenë e paramenune edhe raksioni ka qenë i paraparë.--Hipi Zhdripi 22:32, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Në dash mi marrë veshë kta shkije, meno si ata. Gjithë çka është e lejume me mbrojtë vendin tonë, edhe nçoft se doket tradhëti ti po e ngje Hipin e gjebesa edhe Zhdripin.--Hipi Zhdripi 21:00, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please...

Ako neces pricati o temi, nemoj editovati niti povremeno komentarisati.

If you don't want to talk, do not edit nor comment, please. --HolyRomanEmperor 14:57, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

????? Wat you are talking about--Hipi Zhdripi 20:56, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Dardania

Thanks for invitation to participate in WikiProject Dardania. However, I will refuse that offer for now. The current unsolved status of Kosovo and the constant revert wars between Serbs and Albanians about Kosovo-related articles are not very good starting point for Wikipedia to have good articles related to Kosovo. Once the final status of Kosovo is solved in the end of this year, I will help you with this project because then we all will know correct definitions of Kosovo status, proper names that should be used for Kosovo articles, etc. Since we do not know these basic things at this moment, we cannot have good articles now. I know that the future status of Kosovo will define Kosovar Albanians as nation, not as a minority (whether that status is independence or third republic in Serbia-Montenegro), and Serbs and Albanians will have to learn to respect each other. However, it cannot come now. As I already told you, wait just few more months and the problems will be solved. PANONIAN (talk) 00:08, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the problem - there are 2 documents that define current status of Kosovo:

1. 1244 UN resolution (which define Kosovo as part of FRY under UN administration).
2. Constitutional chapter of Serbia and Montenegro (which define Kosovo as province of Serbia).

I uderstand that first document is more important and that current status of Kosovo is only temporar solution, but regarding articles about Serbia-Montenegro and Serbia we should also to respect second document. I discuss only these two articles for now, because I will not work more on the Kosovo article until its final status is solved. So, in the articles about Serbia and Serbia-Montenegro, it is important to mention what is written in the constitutions of these states. So, tell me this: what exactly you object in the articles about Serbia and Serbia-Montenegro. Propose what exactly we should change, and we can discuss that. Ok? PANONIAN (talk) 02:21, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Of course the 1244 is temporar solution but the S and M is temporar solution too (ony five year see the referendum in Montenegro). Because of that we must present in Wikpedia OR the Federal Republic of Yogoslavia OR we most seperet them. With Federal Law of Yoguslavia Serbia dont have legetimation to go in bund with sombady else withat asking the parliament in kosovo. With Federal Law the Presiden of the Soc. rep. of Serbia must be acceptyt from Prishtinas Parliament in another keys is "blocked" the procedur of the president selection. Because that is UNMIK to work in both seids. Is not in quesqen only Kosovo all the RS of Serbia Constuticion. Argument: the kosovars have the travel document wich is acceptit from 100 countries. All this countrys are helping to finde the soulution. Of course they (this countries) have differen interesis in the region but this it was recomendet from the UN. In the ather seid the Parliament inbelgrad have chanchied the Law and the name from RS of Serbia to Rep. Serbia beacouse that Kosovo is not a part of Rep. of Serbia. If Prishtnas Parliamnet want to stop this chanche from Belgrad Parliament with the Federal Law they have cann STOP. Because of that is UNMIK there to provide this "justice status quo"--Hipi Zhdripi 04:52, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have wrotit this with my broket english and I was thinking that you know the Yougoslavian Law. If you want Im going to finde argument about all wat I have sayed. But dont forget I must work in Albanian Wikipedia becaouse of my broked english und they need more help.--Hipi Zhdripi 05:40, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo it was anexet from Serbia in year 1912 see berliner kongres
Kosovo it was anexet from Serbia in year 1918 see Veraj konferenc
Secend meating of AVNOJ (creating of komunist yugoslavia in Jajce) - Kosovo it was out seid of Yugoslawia (?)
Meeting during the Komunist time in Belgrad betwen the Dusan Mugosa and Mehmet Shehu. (In the book is writning) Anti Fashist Nationl War Komite has meetit in Belgrad 7-9 aprill 1945 and they have disedied that Kosovo is going to be a part of the Federal Republik of Serbia the border betwen Kosovo and Serbia it must be samwer in the place callet in albanian "molla e kuqe". the Folk o f Kosovo diden accept that because that in Kosovo in year 1945 it was the military state it was war betwen Drenice clas (called from komunis als ballist) and the partizas. It was war for mor that 4 years. Military state at 1956-58. Military state at 1968-74. mailitary state at 1981-83. Military state at 1985-89.
Rez. of Bujanovc
Meating in prizren
SFR of Yugoslavia Constituction

Paragraf 1. and 2 Kosovo it was a part of the Federation
Paragraf 5. Kosovo has terriori and his borders (gartiet from Federation like the border of Serbia or Kroatia)
Paragraf 244 al 2 Kosova eas legetimatet like others rep. in federal parliament, senat (Komite), Court, Constution Court,
Paragraf 398, 399, and 402 al 2 Kosovo (parliament) have the same rigt for the chanchen of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Yougoslavia like other Republics.
Paragraf 147 Kosovos has owen ledaer who legetemat the inters of kosovo in federation

Key point for Wikipedia

Paragraf 150 Kosovo diset about the Administrat (District, municapitalit)
....

Because of this (a=articel)

If Belgrad is a city in Serbia, then Prishtina is a city in Kosovo
If Belgrad is a city Yugoslavia then Prishtina is a city in Yugoslavia

acording to 1244 in wich is implemete at the same time the teknikal agreement and Ramboi agreement

They are going to be seperetit In Yugoslavia is going to be S. and M Law, in Kosovo UN Law for 5 year

However, Kosovo cann not be prasenty as of Serbia or S.and M. onl as part of RS Serbia and SFRY. And the Kosovos citys are not the serbiens citys (only becose the Republic name it was RS Serbia) they are kosovars city.--Hipi Zhdripi 06:34, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think Kosovo you cann put under the Military Serbian land--Hipi Zhdripi 06:44, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And the translation from sebian-kroatian language or beter to say komunist language for the term "Provic" in english like a "Provinc" hase no seanc. You canne user that but that dont present the real meaning of the term in komunist launguage. It was uset only to quite the sebien nacionalist elements becaouse they dieden wonti to hear the word "Republic" --Hipi Zhdripi 06:51, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't want to talk, do not edit nor comment, please. --HolyRomanEmperor 14:57, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

????? Wat you are talking about--Hipi Zhdripi 20:56, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

I kept asking you a 1,000 times what's wrong with me and the other arguements, and you ignored all my posts. On the other hand, you continue reverting and adding one-man-led comments on Article Talk Pages. That's why I object. Talk to me, man! --HolyRomanEmperor 11:37, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Till you dont accept the UN Law, I dont have wat to talk with you. Do you accept the UNMIK in Kosovo? --Hipi Zhdripi 13:08, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ofcourse! When did I not accept it, my friend? :) --HolyRomanEmperor 16:27, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Njegosh

My main interest wasn't about Kosovo; it was about Njegosh. Do you understand now? --HolyRomanEmperor 20:38, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ма, заборави га. Немој да трошиш времена на њега. Не вреди ти то ништа, ако те не слуша. Незна ни Енглески. And you didn't do anything wrong either, so I don't see the point of you accepting the UNMIK when they are already there, and run the place. Serb-free. Great book by the way. -Поздрав, --Krytan 23:57, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Krytan, and you speak a very good English, using cyrillics. No need to offend people for what they know. Help them if you can, if not don't offend in return. That is bad manner. Take care. Ilir pz 10:47, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HolyRomanEmperor for the last time I m writing to you. You dont know nothig about the Yugoslavien, Serbian, Kosovo and the UN Law. You are doin nothing els only you are traing to put and rev. the articel about Kosovo withaout any argument (beacose not that you dont have a argument but you dont know wat is argument and Law). I know that my english is not gut, but that is not meaning that you know samthing about the Law. perhaps you are 12 or 14 year old. Go and give your contribut to the music, fil m and somthing like this Wich your Edit Wars you dont contriebut to serbia only you pruf tat the serbians wont the traubel in Balkan. Sorry, but perhaps we will met us samwer els in the music pages and then you can tell my about the music.--Hipi Zhdripi 05:05, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More argument

See: “The problem of Kosova did not begin in 1981. Neither did a counter-revolution occur there, there was not even a revolution before. The year 1981 should have been the final opportunity for Kosova to become a republic. The root of this request is the Conference of Bujan and Tito’s promise that this will be realized.” (Dr. Neca Jovanov, Delo, 25. mart 1989, str.22 - Jovanov, Dr. Neca, Delo, March 25th, 1989, p.22) See: “For the development of the National Liberation War in Kosova, of great importance were the decisions of the Second Meeting of AVNOJ. The days of December 31st, 1943, January 1st and 2nd, 1944, in the village of Bujan in the Malësia [Mountainside] of Gjakova, was held a conference in which the National Liberation Organization of Kosova and Metohija [Dukagjin] was formed. Fifty-nine delegates participated in the conference, who accepted the decisions of the Second Meeting of AVNOJ, chose the NLO for the province and brought a resolution and a proclamation.” (Opca enciklopedija) See: Now... for the first time in history, the Albanians will decide themselves about their own destiny...” (Govor Marsala Tita delegaciji Albanaca Kosova i Metohije pocetkom aprila 1945. Radosin Rajovic, Autonomija Kosova, Beograd, 1988, Prilozi - Speech of Marshal Tito to a delegation of Albanians from Kosova and Metohija at the beginning of April, 1945. Rajovic, Radosin: The Autonomy of Kosova.)

Kosovo

Hey there,

I was thinking of both 1244 and the Constitutional Chapter of S-M. The UN specifically states that it does not question the sovereignty of S-M within Kosovo, and as a result, Kosovo still is de jure a province of S-M. Of course I realise that de facto the situation is different, but the Wikipedia should neutrally portray the de jure situation as well.

Cheers, The Minist e r of War ^(Peace) 10:11, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is intepretation:

I was thinking of both 1244 and the Constitutional Chapter of S-M. The UN specifically states that it does not question the sovereignty of S-M within Kosovo, and as a result, Kosovo still is de jure a province of S-M.

"De juro" Kosovo is a part of Yugoslavia acording to 1244. After that you have the referendum in Kosovo in one side and the S-M is a bound for 5 year (you must write that in Wikipedia) or till the referendum in Montenegro.--Hipi Zhdripi 16:11, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is enough to mention the 1244 resolution, and in all versions of Kosovo wiki there was that "de jure" indication. Isn't Wikipedia about facts, and backing your facts with sources, so writing what is de facto?? Regards, Ilir pz 10:46, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

de jure a Province of the Republic of Serbia, de facto a UN-administered territory of the State Union Serbia and Montenegro... --HolyRomanEmperor 11:25, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. Perhaps with the addition that this entails a great deal of autonomy without being formally independent, but that is mostly already implied. The Minist e r of War ^(Peace) 08:33, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Montenegrins

Please, understand. I came to your talk page to discuss your pushing when regarding the Montenegrins and Nyegosh! Can you remember your claims? I want to hear them justified. --HolyRomanEmperor 11:19, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You nd Kosovo

Asterion, I dont know how old are you, but give your contribution in the articel in wich you know wat you are doing and then you cann tell me a bout your work and contribution. Im am seenig that you dont know nothing about the Yugoslavien, Serbien, Kosovo and UN - Law. With your edit war i the Kosovo articels you are saying the same thing like the Balkan peopel is saying about the serbs: that the serbian peopel know only to make troubel in Balkan and they are doin in Wikipedia too. If you do wat I am saying you are going to contrbute more to your countrie. In other keys you are given the argumet that the serbian Wikipedia memeber are maken the War, not only in Balkan but in Wikipedia too. And believ me, nobody in Wikipedia (or in Balkan) dont want War. Weck up, is the year 2006--Hipi Zhdripi 05:21, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry but I find hard to understand every second word of this comment. Every single of my edits is well referenced and sources mentioned and quoted. Maybe you feel you own the article simply because you were born there. Well, this is not the case. I have previously invited you to contribute your views to it but, I am afraid that neither your grasp of English is up to standard nor you seem to be open-minded enough to respect other people's views. Checking your history of contributions, over 90% of these are for reverts to obsolete, POV biased (and I noticed you mentioned before do not even know what WP:NPOV stands for) and full of grammar and spelling errors. I do not wish to waste my time in pointless arguments with you, if you have any point to make on this topic, please do so (with verifiable sources, of course) on Talk:Kosovo. With regards, --Asterion 14:56, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In your language taket from panonia side: E, a što se tiče tog problema oko kosovskih okruga, tom problematikom ne želim da se bavim dok se konačni status Kosova ne reši. S obzirom da je sadašnji status Kosova prilično konfuzan, teško je reći ko je u pravu u ovom sporu. U rezoluciji 1244 se zaista nigde ne pominje Srbija, već samo SRJ, prema tome, status tih kosovskih okruga je zaista nemoguće odrediti. PANONIAN (talk) 00:07, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

My language? I am Andalusian Spanish, not Serbian. --Asterion 00:29, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paparlapap!!!! Dont tell my "PALLAVRA". Im the Miackel Jackson (NATO) not the singer. hahahha--Hipi Zhdripi 02:27, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copy cat

Must you copy everything from me? First of all, WikiProject Dardania is simply done in the same style as WikiProject Serbia, try to be creative and think of your own design. Secondly, your signature bears a striking resemblence to my signature, even the colors are the same. Maybe you Kosovars do need Serbs to show them the way... ;-) --serbiana - talk 06:00, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I like you. --Hipi Zhdripi 06:02, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have made the same "PALLAVARA" like you to see the other user what you are making.--Hipi Zhdripi 06:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is pallavara? --serbiana - talk 06:07, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In Spanish L, Arabian L. Serbian L. Montenegro L ( Mediteranen L). "PAlAVRA" --Hipi Zhdripi 06:10, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, i still don't understand. --serbiana - talk 06:12, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

but, anyways, i would appreciate it if you could write that I designed the template, somewhere on the project page. i think you will agree with me that its not fair to take credit for something you copied. --serbiana - talk 06:13, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Let the user know Who are the Kosovars and who are Serbians with out demegen the image of Balkan. Balkan is my Home--Hipi Zhdripi 06:17, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Balkan is not my home, Canada is my home. Could you put "Special thanks to Boris for creating the template for the project" on the project page? --serbiana - talk 06:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paparlapap perhaps you are liven thar an you have inof to eat, but the peopel in Belgrad, they dont have that. That all about your "Patriotismus"--Hipi Zhdripi 06:33, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I send $500 every month to the Serbs in Kosovo. I am a patriot. The people in Belgrade are pretty rich, they all complain that they are poor, but they all have good cars, nice houses, something that most Canadians don't have. Once again, could you put "Special thanks to Boris for creating the template for the project" on the project page? Nije lepo hvaliti se za nesto sto si iskopirao od mene, makar se zahvali. --serbiana - talk 06:37, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paparlapap--Hipi Zhdripi 06:38, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please, stop threating me and starts discussing with me

Why do you continue with baseless threats? Talk, man. Talk, please, don't argue. --HolyRomanEmperor 18:17, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.. Staying unlogged will not save you from any possible block and will certainly extend the length of the ban --Asterion 18:22, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Hipi Zhdripi. Take the IP block as mini-holiday and reflect over your recent behaviour. Regards, --Asterion 20:53, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

Thank you for your insults. I really tried to be nice with you, but I see that we cannot talk until you grow up. See you then. PANONIAN (talk) 18:11, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gotovo...

Obruc oko tebe se steze, jos koji dan i izglasace da tebe i tvoje sockpuppete zauvek izbace sa Wikipedije. Uzivaj dok mozes... --serbiana - talk 04:36, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kujdes

Kujdes, hipi, se me sulme nuk arrihet kurgja. Vec cka bllokohesh. Durohu pak, se keta kane lidhje te forta e ta ndalojne hyrjen ne Wikipedia. Vec gjej artikuj qe ndihmojne e se bashku i rregullojme. Mos plas me keta se nuk ki hesap :))) Te pershendes, Ilir pz 06:58, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo-geo-stub

Kosovo-geo-stub has been speedily deleted as a recreation of a stub type that had already been deleted via WP:SFD. Please do not re-create it (if you do, you'll be running a serious risk of another block from editing). Territories of which the official status is not finalised are not given separate stub types (as it is, Kosovo-stub redirects to the Serbia stubs category). This is the reason there is no stub type for Turkish Cyprus or for Somaliland, and why the recently discovered Transnistria-stub is currently at WP:SFD. FWIW, stubs for places in Kosovo are being marked with SerbiaMontenegro-geo-stub rather than Serbia-geo-stub, Theoretically, the Kosovo geo-stubs could have been put into the Serbia-geo-stub category, but this way they will be more clearly grouped in one place, in the country which they are still technically in, but also outside the main body of Serbian stubs. This way if and when there is a final decision on Kopsovo's status, it will be easier to determine what stubs are where. Grutness...wha? 14:39, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

At first, Kosovo it was part of Yugoslavia and member of the Soc. Rep. Serbia. Milosevic has destroit the Soc. Rep. Serbia and this Federal Provinc anexet to the his Rep. Serbia. This Milosevic Serbia is not a member of the UN. The only member of the UN are Yougoslavia and Serbia and Montenegro after the Kosovo has ben declaredt from UN as a provinc in Balkan. Now you can not say that Kosovo is teknikal a part of Serbia and Montenegro becose Kosovo has ben declartett from UN as Provinc in Balkan. If you need the argument go and see the UNMIK documentation and dont forget all this documents are accordin to the rez 1244.

Dont forget is no the same SR Serbia and Republic Serbia. There are a big differend like the Sovjet union und Russia or Ottoman Empier and Turkie.

You must understend wat is SR Serbia?

SR Serbia is a constitutiv element in SFR Yugoslavia.
SAP Kosovo is a constitutiv element in SFR Yugoslavia. (Not it!!! the SR Serbia and SAP Kosovo for Yugoslavia are in same level, this is importen for UN)

Serbia (Not it!!! is not SR Serbia), SAP Kosovo and SAP Vojvodina make the RS Serbia.// (the thre elements in Federadion re in same level, but they have a bound called RS Serbia). The uset name of this republic in english it was SR Serbia (Not it!!! it wa not Serbia, every time when the members of the Yugoslvia has meande this Republic have uset SR Serbia).

Milosevic and deth of SR Serbia?

Milosevic with force has destroid the Kosovo Provinc. (The bound called RS Serbia was deth and Kosovo was anexet from a member of the bound wich was never acceptyt from UN)

Ocupation of Kosovo

Miosevic has Okupatiti the provinc this it was not acceptyt from the UN.
Rez. 1244 and Intervention of UN in this bound in 1999.

For You to understen. Milosevic has ocupatit Kosovo. Think a liter if Kosovo has anextet Serbia and chanchet the name (consritution) from Soc. Rep. Serbia to Rep. Kosovo. Do you have right to say that Serbia is teknikal a part of Kosovo. NO beacose this two part of Soc. Rep. of Serbia hase the same right in Federation (now UN).

The act of the UN it was beacose of humaniatry. Thate is thrue. That it was not only about the ethnic cleans but for more than that. Helpin the ekonomy of the peopel there, till the members of SR Serbia finde a soulution. For this resens they have decklaredit Kosovo as Provinc in Balkan, wich has right of maken bisnes with other contries in region. Serbia and SAP Vojvodina they diden wontit to be protecit from the UN. But they wantet from UN to be alowed to merge with Montenegro in poliical boud.

Dont forget at the first Kosovo has ben declaredet as Provic in Balkan from UN and then it was alloved to change the name from Ex-Yugoslavia to Serbia and Montenegro.

For all this I have a argument. If you put the Serbian-stub in Kosovo articel you are accepting the ocupedet Federal Provinc of Yugoslavia during 1992-1999. This province it has ben free since 1999 and now is under the UN administration and kosovars with a parliament and constitucion. This provinc it has ben declaredit from UN als free province in Balkan with out status.

If you put the Serbian and Montenegro stub (OR Category OR ...) it a same like puting in Kosovo articel the Albania-stub, or USA - stub.

Hello. I heard your cry for help. I have investigated, and I see that the {{Kosovo-geo-stub}} you mention was deleted in December after discussion (see here for a look back at that discussion). The admin who most recently deleted the template seems to have taken the view that it was a re-creation of a previously deleted template (which is a valid criterion for speedy deletion). So this all appears to have been in accordance with Wikipedia policies and processes. If you want the discussion reopened, I can only suggest you take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review. I have no strong views on the matter at all - except that I entirely endorsed NATO's actions in helping Kosovans to resist Milosevic - but I have to say it seems unlikely that anyone will reinstate the stub template. On balance I think I agree with Grutness's assessment above. I am sorry I cannot give you the answer you obviously want. I see from the Kosovo article that Kosovo may be independent by the end of 2006. If and when that happens, you will probably have a better chance of reinstating the stub template. Best wishes. --RobertG ♬ talk 16:54, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arvanites

Hi, thanks for your contribution to Talk:Arvanites - only, I'm afraid not many people will understand the Albanian there. I take it you were making a point about the use of the different alphabets? Can you make your point in English, or find somebody to translate for us please? Cheers, Lukas ^(T.|@) 19:32, 21 April 2006 (UTC) (Oh, by the way, most editors on that page will be away for the next few days anyway. It's Greek Easter! :-)[reply]

Thanks for the translation! So, just to make sure I understood you correctly, you are stressing the closeness of the Epirus Arvanitic dialects with those of southern Albania proper, right? And the continuity between the Greek-based orthography of Arvanitic in Greece and the older traditions of Greek-based writing used by the orthodox church in Albania? Okay, I think this mostly fits in with what we are currently saying at the other article, Arvanitic language and Arvanitic alphabet. Is there something concrete in the main Arvanites article that you would like to see changed? Lukas ^(T.|@) 22:09, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think this "dialect" Arvanitas is nothing als only a orthodox version of the Albanian L. They uses the old greece alfabet to writte the Albanian L. The spoket language is the same like in the Albanian Orthodox Church. I dont know hier in En:Wikipedia you dont have a god articel about the Albanian Orthodox Church if you can finde sombody who translet the articel from sq:Kisha Ortodokse Shqiptare you will understand much more. I dont know if the term dialect is given the right term of this. I think you can finde in every language somthing like this, but the peopel dont say that is dialect.

The articel Albanian Orthodox Church it was a part of contribution from this church to the sq:Wikipedia and all they pages are Public Domain.--Hipi Zhdripi 22:54, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shiko kete link, Hipi edhe voto qe ta merr mendja [7]Ilir pz 22:59, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your note

Hi Hipi Zhdripi,

I'm afraid I don't completely understand what you're talking about... I am not involved in the Kosovo article at all, but I know that there is a lot of bickering between the sides. I'm trying my best to keep that bickering down so that it doesn't affect things totally unrelated to things such as RFA. Linuxbeak (drop me a line) 01:04, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see that. You are doing a god job. But you must finde a soulution abot the user acconts used in Kosovo articel. Ther is Edit War mor then 4 year--Hipi Zhdripi 01:07, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

Hipi, I do not have time to be administrator or to work on Kosovo project. It is very big job to administrate this issue and it would take a lot of time from me, which I do not have since I am pretty busy with other things now. I can from time to time to improve some article related to Kosovo or to try to help you to find solution for the dispute there, but I do not have time to work on this all the time. I think that one year from now we will have good articles related to Kosovo (after its final status is solved of course). Until then I do not want to be much involved in this revert war about Kosovo articles. PANONIAN (talk) 20:00, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pleace, do it that for your land and the peopel down there. They diserve peace and fredom, and if you wont to help, to your peopel and the peopel of Balkan you must do it. This is gut for Wikipedia in all balkan languages. I can not write in english and Ilir alony he can not be neutral. Tung, from Hipi

Hipi, I have about 600 articles on my watch list and every day somebody change some of these articles. So, since I watch that these 600 articles are not vandalized, I do not have much time for other things, especially not to work on Kosovo article which would require a lot of my free time. For me, these articles which are on my watch list are more important than Kosovo article, so I would rather spent my free time to improve these articles than Kosovo articles. My advice to you is to learn English better, so you will be able to contribute in the Kosovo articles as well. PANONIAN (talk) 14:20, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock the rebelion ist over

{{unblock|It was not vandalisem, it was rebelion agains the peopel (burokrats) who dont care abot more than 4 year of Edit War in [[Kosovo]] articel}}

See WP:POINT --pgk^(talk) 07:05, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can't rebel against Wikipedia. Accept it the way it is or go somewhere else. Your last actions in HRE's RfA show the kind of Wikipedian you are quite clearly. Have a nice day. --Asterion ^{talk to me}

09:15, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but you are for my a person wich has only thing in his hart o make that the peopel make war. I have sayt to you one time go a way.See :Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers; Wikipedia:Do not insult the vandals; Wikipedia:What is a troll; Internet troll perhaps you speek beter than i english but since I have startit to wor hier you have startit to troll, and you are thinkin that Im a newcommers. Thats are you, you are happy wen samwer is Edit War and you are usen this edit war to be interesant for the comunity. You dont know nothing els only o heat the human bean and dont forget this is you reser acount.--Hipi Zhdripi 23:45, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hipi don't get discouraged from the user above. Remember what his goal is, to make people who don't think like him stop editing Kosova wiki. Instead I encourage you to find facts, and come support the article with them, and rush into writing harsh words toward vandals. Vandals exist, and you cannot stop them by writing harsh words. Should you need more coordination, let me know. Don't take the level of English you have as a pretext to stop editing, we all had(have) language problems. (ne shqip, mos u ndal Hipi, po kerko ndihme nga une, gjej material cka mundemi me perdor, e me pyet mua, te ndihmoj me gjuhen. tung Hipi.) Best,Ilir pz 09:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo cities

So, does Kosovo cities then have flags or coat of arms? Ilir pz told me that Kosovo cities have only flags, but no coat of arms, while you say that they have coat of arms, but no flags. What is correct here? PANONIAN (talk) 14:26, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploadet the komunen maps at Wikicomons. For the emblem, coat of arm or wat ever is that is too erli to present in english wiki. We need more time about that. Pleace n Kosovo articel you must correct the data of the incomin of serbs. Beacose that data is the date of crosing the Danub River from serb an during this time this teritori it was under Biszant. You can late that in that way but from the peopel wich are inform with histori of the balkan will not be acceptyt. I propose you too read the Serbian Military encyklopedia ther you have more neutral data. In this encyklopedie they wrot the day after the SAVA came with his army in the northen of the River in area of Lipjan. I m lookin for more infos about this time. I can not so gut english an I see that is better for me to komplet a artiel in albanian wiki, but that is not so easy Thet is meaning a Edit War in albanian wiki. I dont have that time to be only in war with stupit peopel. [8]

I have map in my historical atlas which show Serb-inhabited lands in the 9th century and north-western part of Kosovo around Zvečan was inhabited by Serbs. The rest of Kosovo was under Byzantine Empire. PANONIAN (talk) 02:30, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Who is the author of that map, Panonian. That is what matters.Ilir pz 08:49, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You want to say that map is wrong? PANONIAN (talk) 15:20, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo stub

I agree that "Kosovo-stub" should exist. Since "Serbia-stub" and "Montenegro-stub" already exist (and Serbia and Montenegro are not independent states but parts of Serbia-Montenegro), I do not see why Kosovo-stub should not exist too. I also agree with UN colour and map in that stub. PANONIAN (talk) 22:06, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PANONIA Answer 2

Hipi, please sign you comments on my talk page that I do not have to look at your other edits to see that it was you who posted that on my talk page. We cannot write that Serbia or Kosovo are part of Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, since it does not exist any more. Only Serbia-Montenegro exist today, and it have its constitional chapter. Until Serbia-Montenegro exist as such and until the final status of Kosovo is not solved, we should respect that constitutional chapter in articles about Serbia-Montenegro and Serbia. Regarding articles about Kosovo only, I would agree that we mention there only what is written in 1244 resolution, and not in the constitutional chapter. You have similar example in the case of Georgia and Abkhazia. In the Georgia article, Abkhazia is mentioned as "autonomous republic within Georgia", while in Abkhazia article it is mentioned as "de facto independent country". PANONIAN (talk) 14:36, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would sign, but they have block this conto. Nevermene. Let make the same system like in that keys. But how you wont to dile with the sebs nationalist? For the Kosovars extremist Im going to be there and rev each thig wat is not accoding to thyt system. -- Hipi Zhdripi from now on Zhdripi hipi it means the same Up and Down (Hipi Zhdripi) and Down and Up (Zhripi Hipi) hahah Chiao.

Ok Hipi, we will try like this: give me some Internet link with UNMIK documents in which the current status of Kosovo is defined, and we will analyze these documents. I fully agree that Wikipedia articles should be based on UNMIK documents but I am afraid that other Serb editors on Wikipedia would not accept that. Regarding "Kosovo-geo-stub", why you do not re-construct it by yourself? I mean, I suggest that you rather try to improve articles about Kosovo or Kosovo cities than to worry what is written in the articles about Serbia and Serbia-Montenegro. As I said, you and me could find agreement that all articles should be based only on UNMIK documents, but other Serb editors would not accept that. Also, I worked much to improve articles about Serbia and Serbia-Montenegro and I do not want to see new revert wars about these articles. I also do not have time to participate in these revert wars as well. I saw recent revert wars about stubs in Kosovo cities articles and I do not want to participate in these wars. It is not me but you who live in Kosovo, so you should to work to improve Kosovo articles. I only suggest that until the final status of Kosovo is not solved you should not waste your time with articles about Serbia and Serbia-Montenegro. You can also write something about history and culture of Kosovo Albanians in this new article: Albanians in Kosovo. PANONIAN (talk) 16:01, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Music of Kosovo

Uhh, I'm not sure I understand the question... --HolyRomanEmperor 10:39, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hipi e ke bo nervoz kete siper. Mos e sulmo se po tutet. Me ka thane me ia perkthy nje sen ne shqip per ty, kshtu qe mos u tut qe te flet gjuhen tone. 16:13, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

articles on Albanians

You are welcome to contribute.

Best, Ilir pz 01:41, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hipi,

Hipi cka po don prej meje? Vazhdimisht po me dergon mesazhe qe jane me shume kercenime se dicka tjeter, edhe nuk po te kuptoj gjysmen e asaj qe po thua. Te lutem me thuaj ne shqip ku eshte ceshtja! --HolyRomanEmperor 21:09, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A po dishe me fol shqip ti a? --Aeternus 16:31, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Me ka shti me ja perkthy une, Petrit :) Ilir pz 16:50, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kur ta prezenton ti ftyren si une, kom me t'kallxu. --Hipi Zhdripi 00:44, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hipi, why are you adding Albania-geo-stub to Kosov@ pages? --Asterion ^{talk to me} 20:14, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

N'koft se nuk priton me ja përkthye dikush qiti far seni Asterion qe pi fut hunt gjith kah, mir ish kon.

Asterion n'koft se ti nuk koke Holy pse po e njek, po i shti turit gjithkah ku pi shti Holy? Ti a po doket qe na hajim bari si Lopa? Dallaveret e tua i kam kalu. Edhe n'koft se nuk e di guhen e k'saj Wikipedie un bari nuk ha. Translation "Asterion, if you are not Holy, why are you following him, and going after his footsteps, whatever he does you do? You don't think you can fool me by any chance? I got over your tricks. If I cannot speak the language well, it doesnt mean I don't understand. " Gjegjja në të d'vetne :

Un jam munu me ju afru po nuk po doni me kuptu. E vetmja rrug asht me vendos Kosoven ashtu si ka dasht Zoti, as ka Shqipnija as ka Shkinija. Kosova asht e hapne per shqiptar e per shkije. E per me kuptu Asterioni, Kosovart jan kuptu me OKB per kit pun. Cungu per Kosove duhet me kon i Kosoves se ashtu e ka dasht i madhi Zot. Zoti ka dash me kone k'shtu, mos me pas luft mo en Kosove. E ju po doni mu bo ma te meçem se Zoti, per njata keni luft k'tu. Kur Zoti ta n'drron menjen ndrroni edhe ju cungjet. --Hipi Zhdripi 00:44, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Translation "I tried to find compromise, but you are refusing to do that. The only way is to put Kosovo the way God made it, neither with Albania or Serbia. Kosovo should be open for Albanians and Serbs. The Kosovo stub should be like it is. You cannot just change it because you dont like it"

Hipi, I can't speak Albanian, sorry. Can anyone translate this? --Asterion ^{talk to me} 22:17, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Find a transleter, if you are a Spanjol you dont need that beacose you are going to understandn how it is now in Sq:--Hipi Zhdripi 00:44, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So, why did you refer to me (mentioning my name) on your last edit and reply to my question is Albanian? This is English Wikipedia, so I write in English. In Spanish Wikipedia, I do in Spanish. In Italian Wikipedia, Italian. And so on. I was not being rude, simply pointing out that if you are indeed replying to my comments, please in future do so in English if you expect a reply from me. Regards, Asterion ^{talk to me}

PS: Thanks very much to whoever translated your comments. Regarding the Kosovo-stub, I would like to remind Hipi that it was myself who created it. At the time, I was unaware that it has been previously voted for deletion. I only learned about this when I contacted an admin. You cannot recreate stubs if they have been voted for deletion as this goes against Wikipedia policies!--Asterion ^{talk to me} 12:05, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To all Albanian user in en:Wiki

To all Albanian user in en:Wiki, don t lose your time with this peopel. No 2-3 months they are going to get that wat they have produce mytologi but now they dont have time beacose they most work realy. See

http://www.b92.net/english/news/index.php?&nav_category=13&nav_id=34747&order=priority&style=headlines

Montenegro preparing new passports | 12:59 May 04 | Beta

PODGORICA -- The Montenegrin Government will announce a tender for the production of new personal identification documents.

The tender for the production of personal documents also includes a plan for new passports, in anticipation of the independence referendum scheduled for May 22.

Deputy Foreign Affairs Minister Dragan Sekulovic told daily Vjesti that strict standards for the production of these documents have been set, especially for passports, adding that some of the most well-known companies from the US and Europe have shown interest in participating in the production.

He said that the tender will last one month and, if the independence referendum is successful, the new passports are expected to be issued by the end of the year.

The existing Serbia-Montenegro passports will be able to be used during the period of transition and the prices of the new passports will depend on the quality, though Sekulovic estimates that the prices will not be greater than 50 euros.--Hevnonen 14:36, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

regarding your comments

I understand you have spent a long time searching for sources. Nevertheless please note that wikipedia fair use copyright policy does not allow to reproduce whole chunks of text unless it is in the public domain. It is preferrably to provide a link to the text or to quote small sections instead. apologies for any misunderstanding. Regards, Asterion ^{talk to me} 08:38, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

Asterion ^{talk to me} has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}} or {{subst:smile2}} to their talk pages. Happy editing!

Albanian-English dictionary

You may find this resource useful: [9] --Asterion ^{talk to me} 14:40, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Yes this is what I m traing to say all the time.

I dont wount to be active in the article in en:Wiki (I have breaced my project about geography of Europe country at sq:Wikipedia ). I dont have time for en:Wiki. Only think is that in this project your work and the work of same peopel here is blocen the work of many Kosovars wich have know-legend about the articles for Kosovo. Since you are so agresive to they (Kosovars), they don t wont to work in this project (this is en:Wiki problem, my problem is they dont wont to work in Sq:Wiki). And they are saying to me (in sq:Wikipedia) that We (sq:wikipedia and en:Wikipedia) are the colaboratin with serbian propagander project. See here http://sq.wikipedia.org/wiki/P%C3%ABrdoruesi_diskutim:Rudi pehaps sombody is going to translete. --Hipi Zhdripi 17:08, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You should try to convince Ilir pz and Telex to help you with Albanian wikipedia. Regards, --Asterion ^{talk to me} 17:17, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hipi, we're all so happy you don't have time to contribute to en: Wiki, so please...get out now will ya? C-c-c-c 00:28, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just go away Hipi, I'm tired of listening to your bad English... --serbiana - talk 00:30, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How many user are tired listening your mytologie?--Hipi Zhdripi 02:42, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The number would be 1, since it's only you - however it's 0, since there's no mythology. ;D --HolyRomanEmperor 18:34, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here Hipi, I'll teach you one word of English. MYTHOLOGY. I really suggest you look up the meaning. You can't speak half German half English with some Albanian added in this Wikipedia. C-c-c-c 21:44, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For God's sake, Hipi, please leave me alone. Let me live, man! --HolyRomanEmperor 19:03, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some of you guys keep harrassing hipi for his level of English. Why don't you instead feel good about your command of English, and not insult someone for not being as good as you? This is impolite, above all. ilir_pz 21:22, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not harrassing him for anything; he's harrassing me. I just want him to stop that. --HolyRomanEmperor 21:35, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hipi, please do not pressure or flood people with your opinions. Try to supply sources for your edits, possibly links, and ask for help from me, and I can help you clarify your points. I'd do that with pleasure. HRE, still, making fun of someone's skills on something is not polite. I am not saying you keep doing that. ilir_pz 22:13, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Taken from discussion User talk:Zhdripi Hipi

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

File:Vula e kryetarit.PNG

Hipi, what on Earth are you talking about?

You accuse me of have many accounts. I've never had a single account except for this one and User:Sargeras - my very old account. Note that it is offendive to insult other people for having sockpuppets, when there is no proof of such claims. There is a CheckUser - you can freely use it and check if I am someone's sockpuppet or have any sockpuppets at all. Now please, either go there and see for yourself that I am not a sockpuppeteer, or just stop saying that.

Second of all, you acuse me of some sort of writing "Serbian Projeckt" and I have no idea what you mean. If there is something that you don't like with me, just say it; please don't speak like a Native American Chief. I don't see the point in you informing me that you're older than 7, nor do I understand what you mean by "PALLAVRA".

Now, about that map - no idea why you asked me why is it wrong - it is incorrect as it doesn't contain the namings of the Cities or States; additionally, the Cities are drawn in wrong places. --HolyRomanEmperor 13:13, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hipi try to be a bit tolerant. Ilir pz 21:05, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]