User talk:Hiyaitsvanessa

Hiyaitsvanessa, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Hiyaitsvanessa! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Mari

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

Disambiguation pages

Please note that disambiguation pages like Mari are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 23:06, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hiyaitsvanessa, you restored the disambiguation page link that Leschnei mentioned above. Please take some time to learn the ropes here before redoing your edits over the objections of experienced users. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 20:34, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Hi Hiyaitsvanessa! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. ParticipantObserver (talk) 19:59, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

why is it reverted? I would like to know since I am new and learning. But I have read the guidelines and im still not understanding --Hiyaitsvanessa (talk) 22:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)`[reply]

Hello, I'm Firefangledfeathers. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mayo Clinic have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 20:34, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted three times. Stop adding it. David notMD (talk) 22:36, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Mayo Clinic. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 22:51, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ok sorry about that. I did not mean to as i said i was simply trying to learn how to edit a page. I did that one randomly but it kept saying reverted. Do you mind explaining in a simple way why it keeps getting reverted. Is it my citations? the way i am describing it? Because i added a recent thing on there that was not there before. So i am wondering what is my issue so i can fix it for writing my own article. Sorry about any incovenience as i said i am learning Hiyaitsvanessa (talk) 22:54, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The best path if reverted is to start a discussion on the Talk page of the article. The worst path is to revert the revert. In specific answer to your question, the first ref is th Mayo Clinic, the second is SSMC. These are considered primary references - the organizations publishing content about themselves. What is required is secondary references - content written by people not connected to Mayo or SSMC or SEHA. David notMD (talk) 01:30, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Medical diagnosis, you may be blocked from editing. Zefr (talk) 21:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help me

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I would like to add a vancouver doctor onto wikipedia. Hiyaitsvanessa (talk) 22:17, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see § Wikipedia is not a directory. Fabrickator (talk) 22:37, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)

There is general advice for how to go about this at your first article.

Creating a new article from scratch is one of the hardest tasks you could choose for yourself as a new editor on Wikipedia. It's possible you will get to your goal faster by spending considerable time improving existing articles before you try creating a new one.

To avoid frustration, you will want to familiarize yourself with the concept of notability and the sorts of references you will need to have in hand to be successful with your addition. Find the references first, before you begin to write. Then, write by summarizing only what those references say. Do not copy. Do not rely on anything the doctor has written or been recorded as saying. Be careful to avoid press releases.

Yes, some of these things may seem counterintuitive to you.

When you are ready to start, use the Article Wizard. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:46, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A fast search yielded no references that would support an article about Pooya Khan Mohammad Beigi. David notMD (talk) 01:33, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mari Misdiagnosis Association and Research Institute (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mari Misdiagnosis Association and Research Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mari Misdiagnosis Association and Research Institute, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 04:12, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your kind feedback, hopefully the citation I provided this time works and is credible based on your guidelines provided. Thank you so much for your patience considering im new to wikipedia Hiyaitsvanessa (talk) 04:40, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hiyaitsvanessa (talk) 05:05, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have made the edit provided by your feedback by adding a notifable source

thank you! Hiyaitsvanessa (talk) 05:06, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hiyaitsvanessa (talk) 18:37, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently reverted the article that I wrote. Thank you so much for your patience and your feedback. I am new in wikipedia and i am trying to learn how to write and cite. Could you please provide me with more guidance on the topic of reliable source, i thought a book is a reliable source and it had the information i wrote on the intro of the book. Please let me know what type of books or articles are ok to cite. I really appreciate your patience Hiyaitsvanessa (talk) 18:38, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hiyaitsvanessa (talk) 01:16, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have reviewed your feedback. Thank you so much for providing feedback. I have asked the wikipedia help chat if this was a credible source and I got a response of yes I could use this. I hope it is fixed now and can be accepted

cheers, Hiyaitsvanessa (talk) 01:16, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Odd messages

Hiyaitsvanessa, above, you have repeatedly posted messages saying "Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time." I don't know why you'd tell yourself this. If I, on your user talk page, say "you", it means you, Hiyaitsvanessa. If, by contrast, you start a new thread on your user talk page by talking about "you", this will be interpreted as you talking to yourself. If by contrast you want to address somebody else, then you'll have to name and ping that person. -- Hoary (talk) 02:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mismedicine (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Medical error. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mismedicine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mismedicine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 04:03, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any connection to MARI?

The nature of your editing gives the impression that you may have some personal or professional connection to the organization about which you are editing (MARI).
Hello, Hiyaitsvanessa. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.--Quisqualis (talk) 07:07, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t have a connection with MARI. Unfortunately I am trying to write about something that does not have a Wikipedia page but it is difficult to cite and therefore I have been in contact in the Wikipedia help page and following their guidelines and instructions. When I tried editing for other medical organizations I also got it reverted. So I stopped editing their page. Hiyaitsvanessa (talk) 08:37, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is not fair for you to assume that I have a connection. I am simply trying to write it but editors keep reverting it when I am following guidelines and saying nothing of promotion Hiyaitsvanessa (talk) 08:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mari Misdiagnosis Association and Research Institute does not have multiple significant references

Draft:Mari Misdiagnosis Association and Research Institute

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Q fever

Hi Vanessa, thanks for your edits there. However, please do not remove non-breaking spaces (containing nbsp in the wiki-markup), as they have special functions in Wikipedia. This may be a problem with VisualEditor and honestly they're relatively rare in medical articles, but I thought I'd let you know anyway. Graham87 19:14, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mari Misdiagnosis Association and Research Institute (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mari Misdiagnosis Association and Research Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mari Misdiagnosis Association and Research Institute, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:14, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mismedicine

Hello, Hiyaitsvanessa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mismedicine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mari Misdiagnosis Association and Research Institute (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mari Misdiagnosis Association and Research Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mari Misdiagnosis Association and Research Institute, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:50, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mismedicine

Hello, Hiyaitsvanessa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mismedicine".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mari Misdiagnosis Association and Research Institute

Hello, Hiyaitsvanessa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mari Misdiagnosis Association and Research Institute, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:04, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]