User talk:Hydloc009

Banknote Specification Table

Hello Hydloc009!
A banknote specification table has been set up by our folks at WikiProject Numismatics. There are guidelines on how the banknote tables are to be presented and how the images of notes should be scaled down. This can be found here. I have been following these and editing the Indian banknotes table but you are editing them again to resize the images making them look bigger, not complying to the specifications. I hope you get this and revert the tables to comply with the specifications or would not attempt to edit the tables if they are already reverted by the time you see this message.
Regards! AkshayAnand^Talk! 03:05, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@AkshayAnand, banknote images are not necessary to be to a scale if not uploaded in actual size, see United States dollar for instance. thank you Hydloc009 (talk)

@Hydloc009, as the rupee notes are uploaded in actual proportions (not size), complying the same with the scale-down specifications will enhance the quality of the articles. AkshayAnand^Talk! 03:18, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@AkshayAnand, Thank you, I got it now, I appreciate your edit. Regards. Hydloc009 (talk) 03:20, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Hydloc009, Cheers! AkshayAnand^Talk! 03:21, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A probable mistake

You recently chose to affix a AsD template on Narendra Modi’s demonetisation policy under CSD A11.But I think the way out would be WP:MERGE.Please correct your mistake.....Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 08:00, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@User:ARUNEEK, Noticeable content from the article has already been moved to Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation, Hence this article/page can now be cleaned up/deleted. Hydloc009 (talk) 08:02, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Follow/wait for consensus! Everybody is in favor of merge;not delete!Please go through the policies.Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 08:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@User:ARUNEEK, I got your point, but what I'm tryin to say is, noticeable content has already been moved to the other article, hence "Narendra Modi’s demonetisation policy" can be deleted/cleaned up. Hydloc009 (talk) 08:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to say,we still has to merge the article and then redirect the merged article to the parent one...(I am doing it now!)Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 08:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@User:ARUNEEK, Great! BTW, most of the content which is poorly written on "Narendra Modi’s demonetisation policy" is already on "Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetization", so It's going to be less work to do anyway. Regards. Hydloc009 (talk) 08:20, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now,take a look!Sometimes we have to go by the policies,even if our heart does not want to!Cheers!Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 08:26, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@User:ARUNEEK, Yes, we must always go by the policies, Yes I got the stuff, Cheers! Hydloc009 (talk) 08:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Finally completed.Thanks,that you understood the need to stivk by policies.Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 08:59, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of infobox paramters at Bihar and Kerala state articles

Please do not continue to delete |image_skyline= and attendant parameters under the impression that they can only be used for city skylines, unless you can quote a policy or guideline that contradicts the note at {{Infobox settlement}} that allows its use in other situations. Dhtwiki (talk) 22:02, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

|image_skyline= means skyline of a location and it is intended for use on city articles, where skyline of the city can be shown. While Bihar and Kerala are state articles (State of India), skyline must not be added, as it is not added on any country/province/state articles. Please check manual of style, also check New York a state of US or Brandenburg a state of Germany, and many more examples on Wikipedia. Regards Hydloc009 (talk) 06:18, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would you tell me exactly what part of the manual of style deals with template parameter usage? I don't recall the MOS addressing such detail, or refer me to that part of the MOS which forbids its usage indirectly (such as specifying how many or what types of images can be used). The fact that |image_skyline= isn't used on some state pages doesn't by itself forbid its use on others, if editors of those other pages decide to use it that way. Dhtwiki (talk) 07:15, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Same for Maharashtra as well. Which part of the MOS? Just showing other articles is akin to WP:OSE and going around removing it on a broad scale like this without any discussion is likely to be opposed. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 20:57, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now you're saying {{Infobox settlement}} says it's only for cities but it's written there "as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country..." Nor does the para skyline add anything. We still have no clue what you're referring to or where. Even if it said so, it has to be based some guideline since anyone can change the template documentation without consensus.

Finally, have a look at WP:CONSENSUS and WP:EDITWAR. We use consensus here. I've provided on both articles links to previous discussions, one of the main signs that the person making the changes should take to talk page first. Repeatedly undoing just edit warring and I've to do the courtesy of notifying you on avoding reaching WP:3RR since you've probably aren't aware of it. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 08:42, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you understood what a skyline means, skyline shows images of the city/town articles. Skyline cannot be used on provinces/states/regions articles. If you're adding skyline to Indian state aticles, then why don't you add a skyline to India as well?, lol, Hydloc009 (talk) 14:10, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Filpro: If you can look into some editors who don't understand skyline is not for state articles, the keep reading skyline images to Indian state articles. Hydloc009 (talk) 21:08, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Kkm010 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —SpacemanSpiff 16:24, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

sock puppet?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hydloc009 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@SpacemanSpiff:, I have no relation to the other account (User:Kkm010), why is this false accusation? I'm not sock puppet. I hope an administrator should not misuse their tools, without proper investigation. Did you check IP addresses? Hydloc009 (talk) 17:08, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes, it was checked and it was found out that you and User:ה-זפר are the same person, which makes this account a WP:Sockpuppet. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:04, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Vanjagenije:, I'm first told, that I'm a sock puppet of User:Kkm010, now I'm a sock puppet of User:ה-זפר? Let me tell you I don't know about any of these accounts, and I want to be unblocked as I was editing rupee related articles. I am me myself, and on what basis I'm related to User:Kkm010 and User:ה-זפר? I think this is a false accusation on me by some users who did not agree with me on edits on Indian paisa article. You may check my talk page and also talk page of the article Indian paisa. Hope you'll get what I'm sayin. Hydloc009 (talk) 00:24, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I AM NOT ANY SOCK PUPPET

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hydloc009 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Excuse me administrators, I just want to make clear I am not any account's sock puppet, I'm first told, that I'm a sock puppet of User:Kkm010, now I'm a sock puppet of User:ה-זפר? Let me tell you I don't know about any of these accounts, and I want to be unblocked as I was editing rupee related articles. I am me myself, and on what basis I'm related to User:Kkm010 and User:ה-זפר? I think this is a false accusation on me by some users who did not agree with me on edits on Indian paisa article. You may check my talk page and also talk page of the article Indian paisa. Hope you'll get what I'm sayin. I've done no harm on Wikipedia, why all this? Hydloc009 (talk) 12:21, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A checkuser below has confirmed technical evidence linking this account to Kkm010. I am unable to unblock this account at this time. SQL ^{Query me!} 03:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser note: This is now a CheckUser block.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23:, like I said before, I am no sock puppet of any account for god sake, what was my mistake and why are the administrators punishing me? I just tried to edit Indian paisa article in a better way. Please tell me if there is a mistake on my side, but don't block me? :( Hydloc009 (talk) 14:59, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23:, I think administrators don't want me to be on Wikipedia, so I think my contributions no body likes it, I was just trying to edit Wikipedia better, If administrators want to block me, then I don't want to editing on Wikipedia anymore, please if deleting is not possible I searched vanishing is possible, PLEASE VANISH my account, I will not edit I want to go to peace, Please vanish, I don't like to have account on Wikipedia now. thank you. Hydloc009 (talk) 15:22, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no way to delete your account and vanishing won't help you and is not appropriate. Just delete your latest unblock request and stop posting here.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:28, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23:, I want to use Template:Retired on my userpage Hydloc009 (talk) 15:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can put it on this page (Talk page) but not on your userpage as you have no access to it and I wouldn't permit it.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:40, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're not using your Talk page constructively. I've therefore revoked your access to this page. See WP:UTRS for appeals.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suppress?

@GB fan:, I wanted to know what comment about me was suppressed and again suppressed as you mentioned here? Thanks Hydloc009 (talk)

It was an attempt to out you. It linked to some off Wiki sites that said they might be you. That is all I can say. - GB fan 21:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I hope the user (User:AKS.9955) who did this, is made sure, that the user does not attack me in future in any possible way on Wikipedia. It's strictly against the Policies, The user (User:AKS.9955) must be reported for attempts to personal attack me. Hydloc009 (talk) 21:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have warned them if it happens again they can be blocked. I do not believe they will do it again. - GB fan 23:23, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Hydloc009 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17023 was submitted on Nov 30, 2016 22:58:20. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Hydloc009 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17044 was submitted on Dec 04, 2016 05:46:21. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 05:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hydloc009, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 09:40, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:500 INR Obs 2016.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:500 INR Obs 2016.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Yann (talk) 20:18, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:500 INR Rev 2016.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:500 INR Rev 2016.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Yann (talk) 20:18, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:2000 INR Obs 2016.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2000 INR Obs 2016.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Yann (talk) 20:21, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:2000 INR Rev 2016.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2000 INR Rev 2016.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Yann (talk) 20:21, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Indian ten rupee coin (2011 Obverse).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Indian ten rupee coin (2011 Obverse).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:29, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Indian ten rupee coin (2011 Reverse).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Indian ten rupee coin (2011 Reverse).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:30, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]