User talk:IndianBio/Archive 16

This is an archive of past discussions with User:IndianBio. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 10

←

Archive 14

→

Undoing "Bang-Bang" song' page

Hello. I was a little confused by undoing my changes in the page Bang Bang (My Baby Shot Me Down).
My changes: [1]
The last line in the Cover Version section was my edit.
I'd appreciate it if you could tell me the reason so I could be more careful next time.

You did not add any reference to indicate that the person covered the song. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:05, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Born to Die (Lana Del Rey album)

Hi, IndianBio, I can't remove incorrect source because several other admins are watching. I pointed "alternative" in the infobox from source that is she won "Best Alternative [artist]" on MTV EMA, not the album. 183.171.182.40 (talk) 13:38, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

I don't understand, what? —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 13:39, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Bad faith

I would really appreciate it if you stop making hostile comments towards me on talk pages, assuming bad faith about my edits, and otherwise being rude to me. I have tried to be civil with you on many occasions and I'm not sure why I don't deserve that same respect. Wikipedia is a collaborative project and, to be frank, your behavior and repeated bad-faith assumptions are threatening to harm that.

Regarding your comments on Snuggums' talk, I don't have a vendetta against any WikiProject. I feel that there are many pop singers on Wikipedia who have unnecessary articles for non-notable songs of theirs, and I began with the Rihanna discussions because she is arguably the most prominent example. I have also participated in similar discussions for Timberlake, Swift, Spears, Cyrus, and yes Gaga songs. Furthermore, I can take criticism, but what I don't appreciate are comments you have made in the past where you call my work "shit". There is a fine line between constructive criticism and outright being rude, and surely you can understand that. –Chase (talk / contribs) 18:36, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

@Chasewc91: I would also really appreciate that you stop your bad faith in your edits and your WP:OWN attitude and I DGAF that you find me rude. And yes, you do have a vendetta against the Rihanna project and not only me, Calvin999 as well as Tomica has also realized that. And you can take constructive criticism? Just because two of your edits I called as shitty, you went ahead and nominated a sandbox for deletion. Guess what? Grow a thick skin. I think I should commit suicide because OMG, my latest GA nomination was not passed! —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 18:55, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

I deleted my sandbox because I was not interested in collaborating with someone who was attacking my work, especially when the draft was being made for the purpose of taking it to peer review to have it looked at by other editors – ones who I can assure you would not refer to editors' work as "shit" or the like.

Again, if you can't realize the difference between offering constructive criticism and criticizing by making rude comments, and if you insist on assuming bad-faith towards other editors like you who are only working towards improving the project, perhaps you need to brush up on Wikipedia's civility policies. –Chase (talk / contribs) 18:58, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

@Chasewc91: charity begins at home, so start the good faith in your own edits and then lecture me. Kthnx. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 19:01, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Making edits you don't personally agree with does not constitute as bad faith. –Chase (talk / contribs) 19:05, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

@Chasewc91: if you truly see it, I had never before said your edits were bad faith until the nomination of "Raining Men" and the vast horde of Rihanna articles for AFD. That tripped my filter. I cannot possibly hold good faith in your edits, and it appears so deliberate and petty. I have to see Calvin999's conclusion on this about you being on a vendetta. Yes, I know I have even nominated some of the Rihanna, Miley and Taylor articles but I analyzed each one on a case-by-case basis and have concluded that nothing warrants a mass deletion. Your reasoning is to create a precedence just because Rihanna is the most populous article? Coupled with your inability to accept other people's opinion (this very moment on the image of Gaga) is a Times Billboard add for bad-faith edit pattern. Do you think its a wonder that not only me, but others have the same problem about you? I mean I love Katy Perry and Madonna, and I also have loved Gaga from Artpop era, but I accept that these articles are not always perfect. But when they are, they are standalone worthy. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 19:14, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

And I simply didn't think they were worthy of standalone articles because of notability concerns. Again, edits you personally disagree with ≠ bad faith edits. –Chase (talk / contribs) 19:15, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Chase, you cannot clap with one-hand. My disagreement of your edit is not equal to the bad faith I find in you now. If the two were mutually inclusive then my support of Whitney's article would have been an oppose. You made a mistake with the Riri articles, accept and move on. However, what you were rilying up on Snugg's page is exactly the same problem people have with you. There are articles in the Gaga project that would be SNOWKEPT if nominated. The mere suggestion of trying to merge them so that an article you want to work on has a better chance of being FA, not done buddy. Now I hope you see why your actions are always taken in bad faith, because they are indeed insincere. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 19:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Suggesting a merge because articles might be kept at AfD (which is purely an assumption of yours) is bad faith? No, IndianBio, you are wrong. Bold editing is encouraged on Wikipedia despite your implications to the contrary.

The fact that I am trying to have a civil discussion with you on your talk page and you respond with snide remarks and an aggressive tone is suggestion that I shouldn't be bothering here much longer. In any case, I advise that you learn to be more cooperative or you will end up with an ANI report for incivility. –Chase (talk / contribs) 20:38, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Obvious enough that he wants a revenge and wants to ruin the work of editors who worked on those articles for 2 years (talking for all the articles, however, specifically the ones on the Rihanna WikiProject). Thank God other editors around started seeing how he acts and pushes on WP:POV and disagrees with everything other editors think. Well sorry great warrior, I am sorry your plans are starting to collapse! — Tomíca^(T2ME) 19:29, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

See Chase how it is not just me but others have the same problem too? So learn from this and move on. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 04:52, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Tomica and Aaron are the only others who seem to have a problem, and frankly, I can't help it if they take personal offense (insisting I want "revenge" for... something) to something that is clearly content-based.

It's not a matter of "moving on" if you're going to continue to make personal attacks and assume bad faith. –Chase (talk / contribs) 05:06, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Sorry Chase if you feel that I have attacked you, might be my frustration with your edits, so apologies for that. However, I'm not that keen on keeping a good faith on your edits until I see a change. Not sorry for that. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:09, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

It's quite clearly not just Tomica and me who are frustrated by your nomination outbursts, Chase. I think you'll find that everyone who has voted keep in the articles you are nominating has had their say on your actions, too. — ₳aron 10:59, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Good Girl Gone Bad FAC

I would be very happy to see your input on the FAC, if you have time of course, thanks in advance. :) — Tomíca^(T2ME) 11:11, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Sure Tomica lemme get around to it this week. PS, GGGB was my first Rihanna album, I got the reloaded version though because of "Disturbia" :) —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 11:15, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Hehe... well we made Good Girl Gone Bad: Reloaded a FA, now its turn to the original album. "Take a Bow" is guilty for me being a Rihanna fan :). Thank you Indian, I appreciate the work you do. — Tomíca^(T2ME) 11:23, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

I'M NOT A SOCK PUPPET

I'm not that Shane Cyrus you're saying. I don't even know why you're accusing me as a sock puppet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShaneFilaner (talk • contribs) 13:45, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

IPadPerson (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks a lot buddy, wish you and all my friends here a Merry Merry Christmas, ho ho ho ho. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:38, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Seasonal Greets!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015 !!!

Hello IndianBio, May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New year 2015.
Happy editing,
LADY LOTUS • TALK 18:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Announcenent

Look what your mother has revealed :P Snuggums (talk / edits) 07:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Who are you talking to? IndianBio is dead and gone to heaven. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 07:31, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Madonna's 2014 magazine shoot

I do not want to talk about her shoot for the December 2014 issue of Interview in detail here (it's too erotic), but just like Kim Kardashian's recent shoot for Paper, I think this too attracted much attention and criticism. So is it worth adding? Kailash29792 (talk) 06:30, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

I mean, well she's Madonna, controversy thy middle name. I want to wait it out a bit more to see if its even worth noting it. Nudity is nothing new in her book it seems. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 08:50, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Well, when she exposed a single nipple (Wikipedia is not censored) for a few seconds at a 2012 concert in Istanbul, that caused much outrage, and has been mentioned in some article here. There is no doubt this recent magazine shoot will also gain much notorious notability. I wonder what would be Lourdes Leon's reaction to all these activities? Kailash29792 (talk) 18:18, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Probably the same she had when she found about this piece of gem. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 18:28, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Imagine how Tony Ciccone feels..... Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:41, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

I read in Madonna: An Intimate Biography that he had come to accept her as she was from the Blond Ambition era, so I guess its Business-As-Usual for him. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:13, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Beat Goes On

You should use this, as it mentions the Get Stupid interlude which featured lyrics of Beat Goes On http://www.slantmagazine.com/features/article/madonna-chicago-il-october-27-2008 --189.144.116.211 (talk) 16:37, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

This is already used. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 15:22, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 December 1

I don't get the difference between "Don't Dream It's Over" and "Material Girl". Both singles have recognized cover arts, but you restricted to just one non-free image. I wonder if deleting one rather than keeping two is a mistake. --George Ho (talk) 16:29, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Wait, I forgot: the "Material Girl" cover art was discussed in Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 September 6 and has been deleted since. --George Ho (talk) 16:33, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, you answered your own question it seems. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 16:34, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

What about the covers of the other song (not by Madonna though)? --George Ho (talk) 16:48, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

I have given my opinion there in the FFD. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:22, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Cassette cover art of Mariah Carey (album)

The cassette cover art of this album is more detailed than the standard squared one. Shall I replace the current image or add the cassette one as extra? --George Ho (talk) 18:49, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Neither. We use the CD cover as the main cover always and it is not that different anyways. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:10, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Possible assistance

Hey bro, not sure what you've got on your hands or what your primary focus is at the moment, but would you care to aid in working on this? I would highly appreciate it :). Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Sure Snuggs, tell me what help you need? —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:56, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

See the "to-do" list. Thank you in advance! Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Already started. I was thinking that the musical style and vocal sections can be merged. They are essentially inclusive of each other. What do you say? —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:08, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

I was actually planning on expanding on vocals for its own section (as seen in to-do list). It might seem short now with only one paragraph, but will be longer later on. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:19, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Okay then, if it expands then of course a separate section seems fine. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

The 1989 World Tour

Hello, you can review the article?. I'm seeing many changes and I do not know if they are correct.--McVeigh / talk 01:48, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello McVeigh, I checked the edits. They look fine to me. An extra date has been added. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:20, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Fancruft

Hello, an IP user added a track to Taylor swift's track chronology in Blank Space with this edit. And you removed it saying that you are removing fancruft. Could please explain why do think it's fan-cruft?. As it's not my edit I'm totally OK with you removing it. I just need to know more about this topic. Cheers!--Chamith (talk) 10:56, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Its obvious, the song "Out of the Woods" has not even been announced as a single, so its a fancruft. Happens every now and then on the song articles. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 12:21, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Oh, I get it now. Thank you for explaining.

--Chamith (talk) 13:00, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

About under taking some articles of bollywood actors

Respected Sir, I had a talk with User:KylieTastic she is an administrator and told me talk to you about for undertaking and caring for the articles of actor Anupam Kher, Paresh Rawal, Sushant Singh Rajput, Aditya Roy Kapoor and Ajay Devgan. I am telling you about these articles because first of all i don't have the expertize in wikipedia editing and second i thought some random ip addersses were making these articles in bad quality so i thought to inform you that please undertake these articles because the ip adderesses and some new wikipedia users will make these articles quality very poor and will vandalize the article. Please reply me back if you are willing to undertake these articles or not. From:59.91.243.207 (talk) 10:58, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Please tell me about one article first and what you find is missing or have been disrupted. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 12:01, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Respected Sir, The first article is of Actor Anupam Kher's article in which adding of relaible sources neceessary because it is written on the top of his article and i want you to correct grammatical errors in the article and also want you to update his picture on the infobox. Please solve these above problems and reply me back. From:59.91.243.207 (talk) 12:41, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

No need to call me respected sir, I will take a look into it. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 13:44, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Template:Album chart

Have you actually read the message you placed on my talk page? It says that disputes should be resolved on the talk page. If you had bothered to read my comment on my edit, you would see that I proposed this change on the template's talk page last week and that there have been no objections. How dare you threaten me with 3rr. I will respond vigorously if you do any such thing. Colonies Chris (talk) 19:04, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

@Colonies Chris: just because no one has commented anything that does not mean that you would go ahead and make a huge change on a widely used template. You are supposed to raise RFC or wait for a consensus, which you failed to do so and continued with your edit even after being reverted. And yes, you are going to break 3RR if you revert or make a single edit to the template again. Either raise RFC and get a consensus else do not edit war. Simple as that. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 19:08, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

How long am I supposed to wait for no-one to object before you're prepared to accept that no-one has objected? What's a talk page for if not to propose changes and invite comment, as I have done? I've done exactly what your notice requires of me, or of any editor, and you're insisting that no objections doesn't mean no objections. What kind of mad alice-in wonderland world is this? Colonies Chris (talk) 19:27, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

See Colonies, if it was just a random article, then I would not have any concern. However, this is a widely used template across more than 100 articles. So it is imperative to have a consensus. And I am disagreeing with your change, I already noted there. Just because I missed it does not mean that I have agreed. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:57, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Rebel Heart

@SNUGGUMS:, IndianBio is no more, died and gone to heaven :D —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 07:34, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Dear IndianBio,
MERRY CHRISTMAS!!! Best wishes to you, your family and relatives this holiday season! Take this opportunity to bond with your loved ones, whether or not you are celebrating Christmas. This is a special time for everybody, and spread the holiday spirit to everybody out there!
From a fellow editor,
--Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook)

This message promotes WikiLove. Created by Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook).

Thanks a lot NahNah, here's hoping your Christmas was equally blessed as mine. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:50, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Rollback

Just a reminder, the rollback tool should only be used for reverting blatant vandalism. Use in a content dispute like this is inappropriate and repeated use of rollback in content disputes will lead to the tool being revoked. Mr.Z-man 03:25, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

@Mr.Z-man: I know that and it was a mistake. I wanted to click on the twinkle revert, however my hand slipped and it clicked on the rollback. I oouldn't undo it :( —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 12:46, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

List of concert venues

Why aren't I allowed to add flagicons to the cities/states/countries listed in the article? And why did you change venues' names and capacities? - Danielle Andrea (talk) 19:37, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Please read MOS:FLAG. It is not allowed and inappropriate. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 03:04, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi Again :D

Hi there, I would like you to review my created article on a song by Interscope DJ, Cedric Gervais "Love Again" released in October 2014. Also check the rating scale on the talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Love_Again_(Cedric_Gervais_song). Thanks! Take your time! this isn't urgent!.

Wait, connection errors. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 12:49, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

GAN

You need not remove the GAN template, you can just immediately failed it for "Shake It Off". Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 03:44, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year IndianBio!

Happy New Year!

IndianBio,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:07, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year!

Dear IndianBio,
HAPPY NEW YEAR!!! A new year has come! How times flies! 2015 will be a new year, and it is also a chance for you to start afresh! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 09:06, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

This message promotes WikiLove. Created by Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook). To use this template, leave {{subst:User:Nahnah4/Happy New Year}} on someone else's talk page.

Living For Love

Madonna's single "Living For Love" was released on December 19, 2014. Stop changing the date to a false date (December 20, 2014). - Danielle Andrea (talk) 04:35, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

@Smilerslove: if you cannot provide a valid source for your assertion, then it is original research and you have rightfully received a warning for it. Continuing to add it will lead to administrative actions. I suggest you read on verifiability policy of WP. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 04:36, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

ETA: I see you are basing it on a Youtube link for the audio video, which was available for streaming. However, that is not the release date as evident by the numerous sources present in the article. The song was available for digital download from December 20, and that is when it could be purchased. Hence it is the release date. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 04:39, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Mariah Carey's #1's

Hi buddy! Would you care to review and add or change whatever to the above article? It's my first try at creating a page so go easy on me! Thank you! — TheMadonnaMusicCN (talk, contribs) 12:17, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Blond Ambition Tour video.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Blond Ambition Tour video.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:34, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Impressive-Instant-cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Impressive-Instant-cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:37, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lady Gaga Fame bottle.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lady Gaga Fame bottle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:39, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Madonna-Ray-of-Light-music-video.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Madonna-Ray-of-Light-music-video.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:39, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nat King Cole Nature Boy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nat King Cole Nature Boy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:42, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Signature

Your signature is not in line with the signature policy, because it uses "big" tags to make text larger, which disrupts the display of surrounding text. Here's what you signature would look like without the bad code:

Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]}

as opposed to

Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]}

The new code without the "big" tag is:

[[User:IndianBio|Indian:'''BIO''']] [ [[User talk:IndianBio|ChitChat]] ]

--AmaryllisGardener ^talk 16:32, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Please? --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 05:05, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @AmaryllisGardener: I've never noticed the text surrounding IndianBio's signature disrupted. Was this an issue for you on a specific page? I'm just confused as I've never seen someone take a problem with this user's signature before and I'm wondering if you personally experienced a problem with it or if this really isn't that big of an issue.. G loss 05:48, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

I would like to know the same as well. Aren't we making mountains out of mole hills? —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:53, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

I've uploaded an image to show you what I'm seeing. It should be enough that there's a "big" tag in your signature and that "big" tags are not permitted in signatures (see WP:SIGAPP). --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 13:58, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation Amaryllis. I have changed it and you can see it now. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 14:16, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 14:26, 24 January 2015 (UTC)