User talk:Iorijapan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Iorijapan, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 04:15, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

December 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Koto (instrument) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Koto (instrument) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=iXQq0ZSje7E) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:15, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:07, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Goldberg Variations[edit]

Please read WP:Edit warring (why edit-warring is not allowed on Wikipedia). You have not provided a convincing reason for them and have not tried to discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Your edits have been reverted by three different editors. They also show a very remarkable similarity to those of 175.104.9.62. Pleas also read WP:Sock puppetry (why your use of multiple accounts and IPs to edit war or attempt to avoid scrutiny is not allowed). WP:TALK explains how to participate at talk pages and why it is crucial for your success as an editor.

Your recent editing history at Goldberg Variations shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Voceditenore (talk) 14:54, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright allegations regarding files on Commons[edit]

Hello. If you believe there are copyright problems with the files you are removing from Goldberg Variations, you will need to take that issue up on Wikimedia Commons, where the files are hosted under an assertion that they are compatibly licensed. Continuing to remove them from Wikipedia while they exist there (without consensus here) does not seem constructive and may result in the blocking of your account. As there are multiple files, you may wish to request deletion using the "mass deletion" option. See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request for more information on how this is done. If you have questions, you may receive assistance at the Commons:Commons:Help desk. If you'd like to request clarification on copyright status before nominating them for deletion, you may find the community helpful at Commons:Commons:Village pump/Copyright. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:02, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:15, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring, as you did at Goldberg Variations. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  De728631 (talk) 17:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It has been explained to you multiple times that you should raise concerns about the copyright status of this file at Wikimedia Commons where the file is hosted. Instead you chose to act against local consensus at the English Wikipedia and kept removing the file link. This is why you have been blocked from editing. Please remember that edit warring is not allowed on Wikipedia even if you think you're right. De728631 (talk) 17:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]