User talk:Iufragknr

Welcome!

Hello, Iufragknr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Kabaddi did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. S0091 (talk) 19:55, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Will keep it in mind Thanks

Iufragknr, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Iufragknr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:07, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Hello, I'm TheEpTic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Human rights abuses in Jammu and Kashmir—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. TheEpTic (talk) 14:27, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

November 2019

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Suresh Raina. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Begoon 07:06, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Premiership of Atal Bihari Vajpayee.

Not only did you remove content without giving a valid explanation, you gave a deliberately deceptive edit summary of "Added content".
This is a completely unacceptable way to edit. There will be no more warnings. Begoon 06:07, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Rahul Chaudhari, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sub |_HMU 13:48, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nicknames for Rahul Chaudhari

Hi Iufragknr, I just wanted to say that some of the information and links that you added to Rahul Chaudhari was possible to use with a little bit of formatting, but you can't claim that Chaudhari is nicknamed "Poster Boy" based on this article. "Poster boy" is a pretty common descriptive term in English that simply means "somebody who represents something", and the khelkabaddi.in article used that term in the title of the article (not in the article text) to say that Chaudhari is a typical representative for the Pro Kabbadi League. If they had used the expression "the face of PKL" it would not have been reasonable to say that his nickname was "The Face", and "poster boy" has a very similar meaning. I hope that explanation makes sense. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 14:13, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi bonadea, I have added an reference from Pro Kabaddi's website,

That reference does not support the claim that "Poster boy" is a nickname – as in the khelkabaddi.in reference, the expression (which again only appears in the title) cannot possibly be interpreted as a nickname. The title says "From general class to kabaddi’s poster boy", a plain and simple genitive construction. --bonadea contributions talk 14:16, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Suresh Raina.

Add sources for all content you add or change, at the time you add it (see WP:RS, WP:REFB), and describe your changes properly in your edit summaries.
You've been clearly warned about doing this several times. There will be no more warnings. Begoon 06:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Suresh Raina has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Begoon 06:42, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Rahul Chaudhari has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. bonadea contributions talk 14:45, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Explain

the reason behind each of the linked edits :--

1) Mass-blanking of content 2) Adding unsourced commentary without any sources, over here. 3) POV pushing, in contravention of established scholarship, over here 4) Un-sourced falsification, as over here

and explain why your editing privileges shall not be indefinitely revoked. ∯WBG^converse 14:54, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And while you're explaining that, explain why you've continued to add copyright violations after very clear warnings, please. If you don't satisfactorily answer the questions above and this one I'll support any move to have your account blocked from editing, to protect the encyclopedia. -- Begoon 15:01, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please adhere to neutral point of view instead of adhering Nationalist point of view while contributing on Wikipedia?— Harshil ^{want to talk?} 15:13, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Ram Janmabhoomi. @Vanamonde93: please take note and apply discretion sanctions on user. Harshil ^{want to talk?} 10:59, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How can you people say it is said as ram's janmabhoomi. ASI have proved it. Don't you know. When I am giving references it is showing its in their blacklist. Can't I tell the truth. Iufragknr (talk) 11:31, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently violating Wikipedia's core policies while apparently unable or unwilling to understand the warnings you've been getting.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 12:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]