Jump to content

User talk:Jdh1234

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Jesse Hofseth)

Welcome!

Hello, Jesse Hofseth! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 23:32, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

August 2015[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Eduard Wirths shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 01:18, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eduard Wirths[edit]

Can you please discuss and explain your changes on the talk page? Thank you.Volunteer Marek (talk) 01:51, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Volunteer Marek, there is a lot of misinformation due to secondhand sources on this individual. The best and so far only primary source is the one I correct the misinfo with: Hermann Langbein was Dr. Eduard Wirth's communist, Jewish medical secretary at KL Auschwitz. Langbein wrote People in Auschwitz and I've linked a PDF of the eponymous chapter title; that book is published in association with the US Holocaust Memorial Museum, and Langbein is incredibly critical of the Nazis/Naziism, etc. Langbein exonerates Wirths except in the area of Wirth's indirect involvement with a single experiment that tested an experimental Typhus Vaccine. Wirths is a complex character, but in many respects he was essentially a "good guy" in the wrong place at the wrong time trying to do the right thing. Thanks.

May I recommend you review Wikipedia's guidelines on WP:Reliable sources? Primary sources should generally be avoided; secondary sources are preferred. One of the issues Volunteer Marek has raised is with the point-of-view of the material you've added; primary sources are tricky to use because they are, by their nature, not neutral. —C.Fred (talk) 02:52, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fred, Langbein is virtually the only source of info for Wirths at Auschwitz. Langbein was a Jewish prisoner there; nobody is more qualified than Langbein to write about Wirths. Thanks.

Please see WP:3RR. You've broken the 3 revert rule on the article. You should self-revert yourself and then discuss your proposed changes on talk.
As far as Langbein goes, he is a primary source. Please read WP:PRIMARY. You can use secondary sources which discuss Langbein though. But again, your edits should be discussed on talk.Volunteer Marek (talk) 05:38, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did read WP:PRIMARY and "The phrase "original research" (OR) is used on Wikipedia to refer to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist.[1]" People in Auschwitz is a published historical document not original research.

August 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Eduard Wirths has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:31, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Hofseth, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Jesse Hofseth! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Worm That Turned (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]