User talk:Jmoss chud

June 2018

Hello, I'm Operator873. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Swaziland, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Operator873^CONNECT 13:11, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Inuktitut

Inuktitut is not "the national language of Canada". Canadahas two official languages, English and French. Inuktitut is official in the Northwest Territories and Nunavut. See the infoboxes in those articles. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:22, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you fur your information and feedback. I thought it was a national (recognised) language because of the Yukon Terretitoes and Nanavut, yet, after some further reasearch, I find that you are correct. Yours, Josh Jmoss chud (talk) 18:04, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indic script

- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Assam, and several other articles, as this contravenes WP:INDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 16:59, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kerala. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 17:03, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for you’re. I was not intentionally vandalising, but now I understand how this edit was not a wise one, and thus, I shall refrain from unconstuctuve edits on wikepedia. Yours, Josh Jmoss chud (talk) 18:03, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced edits to languages in country articles

Hello, I'm Canterbury Tail. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 02:06, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jmoss chud could you reply to the concerns raised please.--Moxy (talk) 23:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 17:30, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advice. May you please tell me where is the boarder-line between a major and a minor edit? Yet gain, thank you for raising this concern with me. Yours, Joah Jmoss chud (talk) 18:02, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See Help:Minor edit. --David Biddulph (talk) 09:52, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia depends upon collaboration & editors who don't often get blocked

And collaboration can't happen without communication. Please stop editing for a while and communicate with others here on your talk page. If you can't or won't than sadly I think you'll have to be blocked from editing. Doug Weller talk 14:31, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I’m very sorry Sorry Sir Doug Weller, thank you for your advice. Indeed, I shall stop editing for a short period of time. Sadly, I am unaware on how to reply to people on my talk page. May you be so kind to tell me how? My aim on wikepedia is not to vandalise, but to help others learn. I have numerous mental-health disorders, and I find that writing about my passion, the world and countries, helps me. Thank you again, Josh P.S- am I replying to you on my talk page?

Sorry, I’ve just worked out how to reply! Thank you ever so much fur your advice, and, I, sorry I accidentally edited my response above. I now know how to use this feature of replying, so I shall reply to more people. Yours, Josh Jmoss chud (talk) 17:59, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Continued addition of unreferenced language related material

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Fiji Airways. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Canterbury Tail talk 22:54, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell you're using services like Google Translate to come up with translations and then putting them into Wikipedia. This isn't how translations work. An other language version of something should only be inserted if A) it can be referenced and B) it is actually being used. Translating something yourself is Original Research and Synthesis, things which we frown upon here on Wikipedia. And anyway even if something does translate into another language we need proof that that language is used and that is indeed the official translation. Thanks. Canterbury Tail talk 22:57, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see from [this edit] that you're continuing to add unsourced and speculative information on languages based on what seems to be your opinion. You've been asked before to provide sources and references that these names are officially used and that they are referenced, but you still are not doing so. I'm afraid if you continue to edit in this pattern you will be blocked from editing. Canterbury Tail talk 23:00, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You continue to make disruptive edits. Your last edit violated several items that people have already warned you about. You are adding "native name" to an English site with no source and it is not used by the organisation in question. Additionally you added it in Indic script despite also being told above that this wasn't not acceptable on Wikipedia in Infoboxes, and you even acknowledged it. As a result you've been blocked for a period of 24 hours for this edit. It seems clear that you're not paying any attention to the information that people are trying to pass onto you above. This looks to me like a clear cut case of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. At least one other administrator other than myself has tried to have this conversation with you, but you're not paying attention. If you do not listen to what people are trying to tell you here and follow the policies, then you will be blocked again. Canterbury Tail talk 19:20, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Southall. - Arjayay (talk) 13:11, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Note this is your final warning. You've been blocked for a week for continuing to add unsourced and apparently completely made up hoax information to Wikipedia. This is your single last chance. After this block expires if you continue this line of editing, you will be blocked indefinitely. Canterbury Tail talk 20:24, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.

While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
Then click on "templates",
Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details beside a magnifying glass followed by clicking said button,
If the article is available in Pubmed Central, you have to add the pmc parameter manually -- click on "show additional fields" in the template and you will see the "pmc" field. Please add just the number and don't include "PMC".

We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:56, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have this ref which does not support https://icd.who.int/browse10/2016/en#/F84.5 Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:56, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Baha’i house of worship (Tiapapata, Samoa)

Hello, Jmoss chud. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Baha’i house of worship (Tiapapata, Samoa).

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:59, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Singapore Airlines fleet. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:03, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I’m so sorry! I was trying to create a template that I can edit on later as it would not me edit as it had frozen.

Many thanks,

Josh Jmoss chud (talk) 18:20, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]