User talk:Krishanna80

July 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Dalpat Singh (soldier)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 00:01, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Daroga. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 04:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am new to vickipedea I was trying to write the proper source Krishanna80 (talk) 04:10, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Daroga

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Daroga, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:55, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023 - again

Hello. Your recent edit to Ravana Rajputs appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 08:38, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks a lot for your guidance Krishanna80 (talk) 09:32, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Daroga, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 08:41, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your guidance. Krishanna80 (talk) 09:31, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your new article has been moved to draft space

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia and creating the Musahib Jaguji of Marwad article! However, this article has been moved back into the draft space so you and others can continue working on it. This person may be notable, but at present, the article does not reference any sources, meaning its notability cannot be verified. For information about proving notability for a person, see Wikipedia:Notability (people).

Take care, Significa liberdade (talk) 23:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jaguji was the prime minister in the reign of king vijaysingh of jodhpur •He left remsrkable impact on the history of marwar Krishanna80 (talk) 01:31, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Too many warnings, insufficient competence in written English and Wikipedia policy

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:28, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Musahib Jaguji of Marwad

The article Musahib Jaguji of Marwad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sole cited reference is a review of a WP:RAJ source which makes no mention of the subject. No relevant results on Google Scholar or Books for either spelling of the subject's name attested here. N.b. the creating editor was blocked indefinitely for CIR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:31, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]