User talk:LakhnawiNawab

Welcome!

Hi LakhnawiNawab! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Fahads1982 (talk) 12:54, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks LakhnawiNawab (talk) 12:56, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello, I'm SKAG123. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Gaganyaan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SKAG123 (talk) 21:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm DreamRimmer. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Anji Khad Bridge—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. – DreamRimmer (talk) 17:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LakhnawiNawab! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Ajit Krishnan several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Ajit Krishnan, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:43, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Mars Orbiter Mission 2

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mars Orbiter Mission 2, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vyomanaut?

May I ask why you are changing the word astronaut to vyomanaut? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

USA: Astronaut, USSR/Russia: Cosmonaut, China: Takionaut, India: Vyomanaut, For more info:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronaut LakhnawiNawab (talk) 12:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the word 'vyomanaut' in any of the three sources mentioned on those articles. Please stick to what the sources state and do not revert the changes until we reach a consensus. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.etvbharat.com/en/!bharat/gaganyaan-why-nair-prathap-krishnan-and-shukla-will-be-the-worlds-first-vyomanauts-enn24022705460 LakhnawiNawab (talk) 13:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source clearly mentions "The term has reportedly been coined by the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO)". Please get a reliable source to change the word. Thanks Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/india-rsquo-s-ldquo-vyomanauts-rdquo-seek-to-join-the-elite-club-of-spacefaring-nations-by-2022/ LakhnawiNawab (talk) 13:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is written by a journalist and not an official press release. I believe there has been no official confirmation from ISRO yet regarding whether they are referred as 'vyomanauts'. [1] Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HAL Tejas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Financial Express. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:10, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hi, I have noticed that you have reverted the edit I did in Arms industry, instead of undoing the edit. you should have updated the remaining values of the countries as well. Shannu Nadh (talk) 8:20 AM, 02 April 2024 (UTC)

Battle of Chumb (1965) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Chumb (1965). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Waqar💬 15:11, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 18th Lok Sabha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Parliament House.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Shooting at the 2024 Summer Olympics. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:LakhnawiNawab/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette^Edit! 08:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LakhnawiNawab! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Toadette^Edit! 08:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]