User talk:Lambanilakyanaik

This is Lambanilakyanaik's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lambani Lakyanaik (February 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jeraxmoira were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lambani Lakyanaik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lambanilakyanaik! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Draft:Lambani Lakyanaik. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Dr Bro, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use your sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Otuọcha. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Advimallanakeri, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Otuọcha (talk) 10:46, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lambanilakyanaik, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:22, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Pradeep (actor), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pradeep (actor). Unless you have something new please don't remove the redirect. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 16:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lambanilakyanaik. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lambanilakyanaik. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lambanilakyanaik|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations[edit]

Hello, I'm WWGB. An image you uploaded appears to be copyrighted content borrowed from another website. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously: if you are the copyright holder and would like to use this image on Wikipedia, please follow the instructions given at WP:DONATEIMAGE. This will start the process to get an VRTS ticket in place on the item proving that Wikipedia has permission to use it. The image should be uploaded to Commons, not directly to Wikipedia. If you haven't created an account here, you will need to create one on Commons. This may sound complex, but hopefully if you take it step by step it will go smoothly. If you have any questions, you can leave a message on my talk page. Thanks! WWGB (talk) 12:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vamika Kohli[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vamika Kohli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —SpacemanSpiff 06:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Akaay Kohli[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Akaay Kohli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —SpacemanSpiff 06:33, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SpacemanSpiff, I have redirected Akaay Kohli to Virat Kohli as I think it will be recreated if deleted. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:05, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Global Kannadiga[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Global Kannadiga, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. EnIRtpf09b (talk) 07:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr Bro[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dr Bro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Florificapis (talk) 07:03, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop[edit]

Lambanilakyanaik, you need to stop creating articles that are not viable for Wikipedia. You can see from above on this page that all your articles are getting deleted; that can't be fun for you, and it's also no fun for the editors who have to deal with them. Articles, especially biographies of living people, need to have reliable sources (please look up that guideline and read it). They must not be sourced to YouTube or Instagram or the like. Also, the people we create articles about need to be notable by Wikipedia's definition. Please read Wikipedia:Notability (people) to see what that means. Read Help:Your first article for more information. I'm afraid your creation of non-viable articles is getting disruptive; if you keep doing it, you will end up blocked. Bishonen | tålk 13:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC).[reply]

I'm sorry, I have no idea for this things. I done mistake on excitement. I learn from these mistakes. Sorry for everything by my side Lambanilakyanaik (talk) 16:45, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. You know, creating articles from scratch is the most difficult thing you can do on Wikipedia, so it's not the most promising thing for a new user to start with. I suggest your best path forward might be to stop creating articles for now, and instead try to improve existing articles. That way you will gradually learn the principles here, and gain the competence you need for creating articles. Good luck. Bishonen | tålk 16:56, 21 February 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you. Lambanilakyanaik (talk) 20:36, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Akaay Kohli[edit]

The page Akaay Kohli has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

Per CSD A7. Minor child not even mentioned in the parent's article. Wikipedia should respect their privacy. Will salt to prevent repeated recreation.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bishonen | tålk 13:21, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Vamika Kohli[edit]

The page Vamika Kohli has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

Per CSD A7. Minor child not even mentioned in the parent's article. Wikipedia should respect their privacy. Will salt to prevent repeated recreation.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bishonen | tålk 13:22, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I have no idea for this things. I done mistake on excitement. I learn from these mistakes. Sorry for everything by my side Lambanilakyanaik (talk) 16:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Vishwas Gowda[edit]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Vishwas Gowda has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to be about a real person or group of people that did not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bishonen | tålk 16:45, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adavimallanakeri Thanda[edit]

The article Adavimallanakeri Thanda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced stub with an existing draft.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adavimallanakeri Thanda moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Adavimallanakeri Thanda, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 22:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Over article, Adavimallanakeri Thanda[edit]

Hello, I have redirected your drafts, Draft:Adavimallanakeri Thanda and Draft:draft:Adavimallanakeri Thanda to Adavimallanakeri Thanda as they appear to be a plausible redirect. I had also redirected Adavimallanakeri Thanda to it's main article Adavimallanakeri, since the article you created seems non notable or not ready for a stand alone page. Otuọcha (talk) 10:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vishwas Gowda[edit]

The article Vishwas Gowda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Broc (talk) 21:55, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr Bro[edit]

Hello Lambanilakyanaik,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dr Bro for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Remsense诉 05:38, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

While this is a standard notice that implies no fault, the warnings above it suggest that you need to review Wikipedia's policies and guidelines regarding verifiability and notability. You also need to respond to concerns regarding COI/UPE above before making any further edits. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

In view of your persistent creation on non-viable articles after warnings, and many other problems shown by the edit filter, such as your repeated attempts to remove the speedy template from an article you created yourself (clearly marked "do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself"), and your roundabout effort to create an article about Pradeep Bogadi despite the AfD decision at Pradeep (actor), I have blocked you indefinitely. Your somewhat desperate attempts to keep non-viable biography articles on Wikipedia suggests you are an undisclosed paid editor, but whether or not, you are too disruptive to edit here. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 11:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Nomination of Vishwas Gowda for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vishwas Gowda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishwas Gowda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Broc (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appolgies and Requesting[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lambanilakyanaik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm appologies to you for my misatke had done. and still i'm not sured what are the mistakes i have done. I'm a learner, i want to learn from mistakes, please unblock my account. Yours sincerly, Lambanilakyanaik (talk) 04:59, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You will need to discuss any connection that you have with the subjects of your edits, which are mostly creating inappropriate articles. 331dot (talk) 07:48, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PS (edit conflict) In addition. Many problems have been catalogued on your user talk page. Please review Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ramaprabha1 as well. Please read and heed WP:PAID. Thanks-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:53, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]