User talk:Lisabeth234

Welcome

Hello, Lisabeth234, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 16:50, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is Lisabeth234's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kishan Kumar Jha (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kishan Kumar Jha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kishan Kumar Jha, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:49, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lisabeth234! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 16:49, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kishan Kumar Jha (May 23)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:55, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kishan Kumar Jha

I want to add article about this Musical artist. Why Wikipedia isn't accepting it. He have Google knowledge pannel. Lisabeth234 (talk) 16:57, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Chaheel Riens (talk) 19:13, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kishan Kumar Jha

This item seems to have become somewhat confused; first of all, please do not remove decline or rejection notices these must be left in place to provide information for other reviewers. In its latest form, before I saw it in the review process, a number of changes had been made and then removed again and if it was the intention to resubmit it, the submit notice was misplaced and malformed so it did not render correctly. I have removed it and restored the missing earlier notices. The item should not be re-submitted without substantial improvement or it is quite possible that it will be deleted altogether. Much more is needed to demonstrate that the subject can pass the music-related notability guidelines or the general notability guidelines. Sourcing and referencing to reliable sources is essential. Please see those pages for more information together with the guide to article creation and the manual of style. But, please do not resubmit unless significantly developed. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 17:24, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please *do not* remove decline notices; the phrase in the markup 'do not remove this line' means exactly that and ignoring that instruction may be regarded as disruptive. If you wish to submit a draft use the template {{subst:submit}} at the top of the markup; this will produce a new submission notice without affecting the decline notices. Some referencing seems to have been added to the item but not enough to demonstrate musical notability (see that page for more information). Commercial sites such as Amazon or Spotify do not establish notability. Wikipedia requires in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources which must be independent of the subject. I will not review the item (although I have not done so previously) but when it is seen by another AFC reviewer it is quite possible that it will be declined or rejected again and may even be prevented for re-creation, if the sourcing is not significantly improved. Eagleash (talk)

Hoshiarpur

Hello. Your recent edit to Hoshiarpur appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:35, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kishan Kumar Jha (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kishan Kumar Jha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kishan Kumar Jha, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:07, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do not mark spam as minor edits

Hi Lisabeth234! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —J. M. (talk) 04:14, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Extinction - Kishan Kumar Jha

Hello, Lisabeth234. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Extinction - Kishan Kumar Jha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:04, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Extinction - Kishan Kumar Jha

Hello, Lisabeth234. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Extinction - Kishan Kumar Jha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]