Jump to content

User talk:Luk/Archives/2008/10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This Archive Page goes from 1/10/2008 to 31/10/2008 (dd/mm/yyyy)

Previous conversations prior to 1 October 2008 (UTC) are archived there.

Ornias

Why did you remove the page on Ornias? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.179.183.49 (talk) 16:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Because it was ripped from an other source, making it a copyright violation. -- lucasbfr talk 11:47, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Frontier 1859

Why in hells name u deleted the frontier1859 wiki page. !!!!!!!!!!!!--193.172.49.111 (talk) 08:48, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

why did u delete frontier 1859 article (abadon ware ) are u french or something :s bet u did not check the latest forum threads. aslong there is development it is not abadonned--193.172.49.111 (talk) 08:53, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Because it is not notable, per our standards. Our articles must be about subjects covered by reliable, secondary sources. It does not appear to be the case at the moment. Maybe once the game is released, it will receive significant coverage. If we are wrong in this assertion, don't hesitate to provide sources and I'll consider restoring it. -- lucasbfr talk 09:07, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Put back the Frontier 1859 page. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.127.142.65 (talk) 10:04, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

You are not addressing the concerns above. -- lucasbfr talk 11:27, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

You wont lose anything having the Frontier 1859 page back up. Hope you can return it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.127.142.65 (talk • contribs)

Thanks Communist

Your lack of consideration in deleting Frontier 1859, where several contributors were involved shows your true colors you communist.


/sign [Sven] I want the Frontier 1859 page back.

yes u snail eating bastard —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.56.32.212 (talk) 21:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Jeez... Yeah let's go personal instead of trying to find reliable, secondary sources that discuss the game. -- lucasbfr talk 02:30, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

if i would go personal u would already jumped for the speed train so no, just put the damn page back —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.56.32.212 (talk) 09:19, 3 October 2008 (UTC)



Sorry for not responding,

I don't know how I missed, but I was talking of this CU. It technically wasn't a CU, but it was done by a checkuser.— Dædαlus Contribs /Improve 12:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Please reply on my talk page, I can't take more pages into my watch list, it's too big already. Admin pages get much activity, and having another one there would just make it worse.— Dædαlus Contribs /Improve 12:45, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Re. Lol

Thanks for being a sport. I was shocked what my origional revert did, not realising someone had cleared up this page before XD. Blooded Edge Sign/Talk 18:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Trap Or Die "non-notable mixtape"?

I love when hypebeast backpackers pretend that they know about rap. gb2WoW plz —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.115.145.227 (talk) 00:38, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Love paneer

Hello. I was just roaming around, and found you. Probably you love cheese. I love paneer. We have two common characteristics: being wikipedians and loving cheese / panner. I am in a weekend mood, and trust that you won't mind coming me to your page to "share" my views. The fun-stats on your user page are great! --Bhadani (talk) 17:04, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

KevJumba move

Thank you. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 16:54, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

GTAForums

Hi, I have contested the deletion on the talk page, if that's allowed. I've also edited in copyright details on the image GTAWiki.jpg. I just took a screen-shot of the GTAForums front page, nothing big. Radicell (talk) 13:54, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 14:01, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Recentness of blocks

Please join the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism#Long_term_vandals_and_freshness_of_warnings. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 16:47, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

I know why you are referring me to this. I hesitated because of the ongoing discussion below the report. However the IP I blocked is a school IP. If vandalism resumes just after the previous block ends, and I see no recent useful contributions, I don't think allowing more hit and run vandalism from that IP is to our advantage. The block is not meant to punish the individuals who sit and vandalize (or I'd wait for the full set of warnings). I don't think that asking for fresh and final warnings on obviously shared IPs is useful (I however insist on that on single IPs and user accounts). -- lucasbfr talk 17:10, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:OYD Altered Photo.jpg

Hi I just wondered if you had read my comments on the talk page, the image linked is not the image that was uploaded. --Nate1481 12:20, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 13:05, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, I think it probably is a derived image, but felt that it was not necessarily clear cut enough for a speedy, as it may be they are derived from a parent image so needed the closer look. --Nate1481 13:16, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Dear Lucasbfr, I am writing with regard to the image being considered by deletion. The original photo did indeed come from the Yahoo Group that you were unable to get onto. You were unable to get in because you need an account in order to look at the group's files. At any rate, even though I originally got it there, it probably originally came from a licensed poster and book, which I've tracked down and listed in the Non-free use media rationale. Hopefully this was the correct course of action to take since the images are useful in Oom Yung Doe article. You will have to believe that I uploaded the photos in good faith, albeit with limited knowledge of how to correctly upload media.Cjim63 (talk) 01:54, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 13:10, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Chinese New Year

I dispute Chinese New Year article, and I hope I can avoid a revert war. But I don't know how I can dispute the article without revert warring when Angelo_De_La_Paz reverts[1] my disputation with no explanation or discussion. VeryGoodBoy (talk) 23:58, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_County_Poor_Farm

Why was this deleted? This was MY article that I wrote that I posted on http://www.raycountyhistoricalsociety.com/ and Karen who is the manager of the musuem and website started this for me. This was the first of many stories that I am writing on the Ray County Poor Farm. If this is a copyright violation I would like to know what I stole and from where. Rod —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.206.90.201 (talk) 11:03, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 11:33, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

User:Slsmonty

I think we are way beyond AGF for this user. We warned him so many times, and he hasn't stop. We should ABF from now on. I have already filed an AIV report on this user. I hope he gets banned soon. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 06:26, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Yeah I saw. I'm assuming stupidity here. Next upload I'll block without regret. -- lucasbfr talk 06:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

My talk page

Thanks for protecting my talk page. ... discospinster talk 21:06, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: 75.139.138.105's vandalism

I work for one of the television stations he's named. I can confirm that his information is false. WAGA is owned by Fox, and will not be shopped out; in addition, WXIA (which is owned by Gannett) has a long-term affiliation agreement with NBC, which is also not being shopped out. His information is false. Period. --Mhking (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Ok, he earned some long vacations then (since he seems to like these articles). Thanks. -- lucasbfr talk 15:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
The only revert I remember making was the one titled 1 where I thought I sent an editing-tests warning, but because a level 4 warning already existed, huggle just reported it. Btw, cheers for letting me know because yeah, I wouldn't have noticed. :$ I'm off for now. Ncmvocalist (talk) 16:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Article deletion: O.O.O.D.

Greetings! I notice you deleted the following page: O.O.O.D. ...for reasons of notability. I have sent you an email discussing this (since at the moment I feel it would be better discussed in private) and would be grateful for your reply. Thanks! Colin OOOD (talk) 20:02, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I have undeleted the page, per the Proposed deletion policy. I will reply to your email too :) -- lucasbfr talk 11:53, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

User:Reeluser

Thanks for your note regarding User:Reeluser. The IP, user:60.229.16.214, was blocked as a ban-evading sock of user:Sfacets. Reeluser appears to be the same banned user and I've applied a specific block to that account too. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 09:26, 18 October 2008 (UTC)


OTRS request

Hi, can you please check ticket #2008091810048421 and advise whether or not it confirms the release of Image:Palin nowhere.jpg under a free CC license? You might post to this MCQ thread when you've done it. Thanks. Stifle (talk) 14:37, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 14:45, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar!

The Special Barnstar

The Special Barnstar
This is the Special Barnstar of successfully dealing with my stupidity! FlyingToaster (talk) 19:25, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
No problem it's not your fault ;) (Even if I still wonder why you weren't able to edit your talk page while blocked) -- lucasbfr talk 13:30, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Another OTRS for you

Ticket #2008031110021007 - does it permit the use of Image:P11 kasparov breakout.jpg under an appropriate license? Stifle (talk) 10:46, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 12:02, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

UCLICK

Hey Lucas,

I'm having trouble getting a new article for UCLICK started. It was rejected and I'm not sure why. Can you help?

-Paul —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prich311 (talk • contribs) 17:52, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Review of user account block

Hi, Reeluser here (I still cannot edit using my account) I noticed you had a look into my account being blocked - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Reeluser . you mentioned you would have a word to the administrator who blocked me? Has there been any news? Thanks Reeluser

the mayans were nice people

yes it is true!! the maya never killed not one animal, they were completely carnovore. they loved corn, they believed that it was the fruitfrom god, but they did not call it corn, they called it "maize". they would also eat a lot of fruit; although they did not have much vegetables in their diet... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.224.28.137 (talk) 22:09, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure that's spelled carnivore -you really should do something about your spelling-, and that means eating dead animals. So if you disregard those killed by lightning you probably need to kill them yourself once in a while. But I have no idea what you are talking about. -- lucasbfr talk 07:06, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Help with image licensing

Greetings, I am trying to help User:Njcraig clear the rights to Image:JOSE1.jpg, currently in use on article José Sarria, in an attempt to get the article promoted to FA. Both the user and I are very confused about what needs to happen to resolve any questions regarding the copyright status. The image is currently tagged as public domain, released by the "International Court System". According to Njcraig, the original copyright holder is deceased and passed the rights to José Sarria. José then passed the rights to the ICS, who released them. What needs to happen so that Wikipedia is clear that the image has been properly released into PD? Thanks. Otto4711 (talk) 14:47, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 17:03, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Excuse me

That is a true story of a man called Scott hall actually. So tell me why it is wrong? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deekybobo (talk • contribs) 12:57, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 13:03, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Poke it

Away and take a running jump, id see the funny side to it as i have a sense of humour. Please block me now. I dont want to be part of your nazi regime —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deekybobo (talk • contribs) 14:09, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

sigh... -- lucasbfr talk 14:18, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

WP:AIV report on 209.7.3.194

OK, thanks for the heads-up! -RoBoTamice 15:25, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

LOL--just read the preceding comment. -RoBoTamice 15:29, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm always happy to help :) -- lucasbfr talk 15:34, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

User:Lucasbfr/Editnotice

The designation "speedy" in the ambox's type parameter is apparently placing the template in CAT:CSD. I previewed just removing "speedy", but doing so changes the look of the template itself. I'm sure there's a work around. Anyway, thought you should know. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 11:18, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

In fact there was a small transclusion glitch. It seems to have disappeared :) Thanks for the notice. -- lucasbfr talk 14:01, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Anytime.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 06:35, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Un-Protection of User_talk:Promethean

I personally would have left the edit protection on for at least 6 hours. Bu you seem to know what your doing as long as you have the page watchlisted, the little darlings will be back no doubt...   «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»  (talk) 00:13, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Please do not protect my talk page

I would prefer the 4channers waste time vandalizing my talk page rather than other editors', so while I appreciate the sentiment, I also must ask that you not protect my talk page. If I need to, I have a semi'd Discussions page I can move talk to. -Jéské Couriano (v^_^v) 08:58, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Sure ;) -- lucasbfr talk 10:48, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/STIR_Future

You forgot to remove the tag from the article. I took care of it. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:42, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Not really, in fact an IP reverted my edit :). Thanks. -- lucasbfr talk 07:30, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for defending my talkpage from the 4chan morons, it hasnt gone unnoticed. The reason I dont want my talk page protected is because of moral principals. Looks like they got bored.....for now. Thanks again !   «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»  (talk) 10:40, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Main Page redesign

The Main Page Redesign proposal is currently conducting a straw poll to select five new designs, before an RFC in which one will be proposed to replace the Main Page. The poll closes on October 31st. Your input would be hugely appreciated! Many thanks, PretzelsTalk! 12:50, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Apteva Checkuser Case

I noticed the Apteva checkuser case has been listed as completed. So what happened? Mrshaba (talk) 17:40, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello Lucasbfr... You moved the Apteva case to completed on the Checkuser page but I don't think it's over yet. If Wknights94's comment influenced you you should note he recused himself from performing the checkuser because he was involved in the earlier Sock Puppet case. Mrshaba (talk) 17:50, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Replied on this user's talk page - 18:50, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Alright. I never saw the case marked confirmed. Did you verify that arbcom received a list of alternate accounts? Mrshaba (talk) 19:57, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Replied on this user's talk page - 21:27, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
I'd appreciate it if you could send a quick note when you get a chance. Mrshaba (talk) 21:45, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 In progress (still trying to contact someone will knowledge of the case and a arbcom-l access). -- lucasbfr talk 11:10, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the update. Mrshaba (talk) 19:42, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure what happened to the checkuser case but Apteva continues to use multiple accounts in a deceptive way to avoid a 15 to 1 consensus. Can you reactivate the checkuser case? Mrshaba (talk) 16:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
It's no problem for me to add the recent activity. Mrshaba (talk) 17:36, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
My post on the Checkuser page and your message on my talk page just crossed. Thank you for your continued help with this. Mrshaba (talk) 17:53, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

User:Onesspite

Thanks for the repairs of this user's apparent vandalism to hydrochloric acid. I'm not up with actually what went on there, but can you report or warn this user? Answer here is fine if required. Cheers, Freestyle-69 (talk) 01:24, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again Freestyle-69 (talk) 20:55, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Protected

I protected your page for one week. A lot of vandalism coming from various IP addresses. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 01:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much. -- lucasbfr talk 08:02, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

haha you fixed my mistake before I could get to it... Thanks!! ~Pip 08:02, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

I had one of these WTF?! moments, to be honest ;) -- lucasbfr talk 08:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

User:NJGW

It's all from one guy actually, Yasis (talk · contribs), a banned POV pusher and sock user that comes back on a different IP every other night to wikistalk me. Probably better to leave it unprotected so they don't get frustrated and go for mainspace pages. Thanks for the offer though.

PS: I normally don't also put the IPs on AIV, but that one just got off a 72 hour block and had already vandalized a few times before Yasis got to it. A lot of the IP's he's using right now have long vandalism histories. NJGW (talk) 13:54, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

OTRS Ticket #2007122210004268

I would like to challenge the OTRS ticket as false information. I spoke with the OSS Society of McLean and they claim the image is public domain. Now, either the OTRS is claiming false ownership or the person I spoke to lied. I personally go with the lady at the OSS Society and her Public Domain claim. Since the OTRS ticket is in question, I ask that the image in question, Image:OSS-seal.JPG, be restored immediately and this taken to AN/I for further admin input. - NeutralHomer • Talk • October 30, 2008 @ 19:40

I have requested admin input on this situation, please see this discussion on ANI. Thank you...NeutralHomer • Talk • October 30, 2008 @ 19:58
Replied there :) You could have waited a bit while I was debating it off wiki :). -- lucasbfr talk 20:22, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Sorry about that, I get a little jumpy sometimes :S Just to make sure I understand though, there isn't an image/logo for the OSS at all? - NeutralHomer • Talk • October 30, 2008 @ 21:09
He might be wrong but if he's correct that's indeed the case. I looked a bit and couldn't find any document with the logo. -- lucasbfr talk 21:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Okie Dokie....sorry about the confusion on the image. As long as we are all on the same page, I am happy :) Please let me know if I can be of assistance on further OSS discussions. Take Care...NeutralHomer • Talk • October 30, 2008 @ 21:36
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Luk/Archives/2008/10&oldid=1146711594"