User talk:Marcinebu1984

This is Marcinebu1984's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saad Kassis Mohamed (December 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fancy Refrigerator was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saad Kassis Mohamed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 13:56, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marcinebu1984! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 13:56, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Thanks for the heads-up. I've made the necessary tweaks to my article draft. Looking forward to some positive vibes at the Teahouse. Catch you there! Marcinebu1984 (talk) 06:12, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saad Kassis Mohamed (December 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saad Kassis Mohamed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:57, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Saad Kassis Mohamed has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Saad Kassis Mohamed. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:58, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saad Kassis Mohamed (December 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:28, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Saad Kassis Mohamed, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 18:30, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed Saad Eddine[edit]

Do not overwrite an article to make it about a different person as you did in this set of edits. If you continue you will be blocked. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from hijacking pages as you did with Ahmed Saad Eddine. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Saad Kassis Mohamed[edit]

Hello Marcinebu1984,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Saad Kassis Mohamed for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Justi yaya 15:18, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marcinebu1984,

You can work on a draft version of this article at Draft:Saad Kassis Mohamed. It was judged that the version in main space warranted speedy deletion due to a lack of notability demonstrated in the article. I encourage you to improve the draft and then submit it for review to WP:AFC. An AFC reviewer can judge whether it is likely to be moved to main space without being tagged for deletion.

If you have questions about article creation or the deletion processes on Wikipedia, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you and Happy New Year's Day! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:11, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 23:38, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marcinebu1984 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing to appeal my block for promotion and advertising. I understand that Wikipedia has strict guidelines regarding neutrality and conflicts of interest, and I apologize for any content I contributed that may have violated these rules. My intention was not to promote or advertise, but I realize now that my edits were not in line with Wikipedia's standards. I have since familiarized myself with the guidelines on conflict of interest and the importance of maintaining a neutral point of view. I am committed to contributing constructively and respectfully to the Wikipedia community moving forward. I kindly request that you reconsider my block and allow me the opportunity to demonstrate my commitment to these principles.

Decline reason:

According to zerogpt.com, this request was generated by an AI. We have no interest in AI chatbots editing Wikipedia, particularly when they are spamming. Yamla (talk) 12:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marcinebu1984 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi there,

I’m really sorry for the edits I made that came across as promotional. I didn’t mean to spam or break any rules. I’ve now read up on Wikipedia’s guidelines about neutrality and avoiding any promotional content.

I understand how important it is to keep Wikipedia unbiased and informative. I promise to stick to these rules from now on. Can you please lift the block so I can prove I can contribute properly? Marcinebu1984 (talk) 15:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am not convinced you have no relationship with Mr. Mohamed(it seems all of your edits over a not-short period of time are about him) but even if you don't, you won't be permitted to edit about him at this time, so we will need to know know what topics you will edit about instead. 331dot (talk) 09:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What topics do you want to edit about? What is your relationship with Mr. Mohamed? 331dot (talk) 08:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’d like to edit pages about philanthropy and charity. I think these topics are really important and I’d love to contribute to them. Just to be clear, I have no direct or indirect relationship with Mr. Mohamed. I’m just interested in adding valuable, unbiased information to these topics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcinebu1984 (talk • contribs)