User talk:MeWiseMagic

Welcome!

Hello, MeWiseMagic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Rklawton 01:22, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Jordan Lee Smith may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. --Bill 21:32, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Winnie-the-Pooh, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! --Yamla 15:40, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scragoatum[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (aeropagitica) (talk) 12:38, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

I'm going through your edits, and removing the dubious material. Please do not submit further dubious material, as it may result in you being blocked from editing. Thank you. DS 13:00, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Roxy Blue[edit]

I've nominated the article Roxy Blue for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Roxy Blue satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roxy Blue. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Roxy Blue during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion.

License tagging for Image:Wantsome.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Wantsome.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:07, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Do not remove AfD tags[edit]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. _{J Di}^talk 15:42, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stevie Rachelle[edit]

A tag has been placed on Stevie Rachelle, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Stevie Rachelle is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Stevie Rachelle. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. -- Merope 19:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please review the policies concerning notability of musicians before reposting this article. Releasing several albums does not assert notability; releasing albums on a major record label would. -- Merope 19:51, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Don Dokken[edit]

Your recent edit to Don Dokken (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 23:30, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Jumping Jack Flash[edit]

Welcome!

Hello MeWiseMagic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Yandman 12:38, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Scott Stapp[edit]

Your recent edit to Scott Stapp (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 16:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Abi Harding[edit]

Good to see an article started (her impact on Jools Holland last night will not have been lost on many) but she was not born in Liverpool. In fact she comes from Bristol and apparently was ribbed at school in Liverpool because of her non-Scouse accent. IXIA 18:33, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brighton Rock[edit]

I've created a new article from the band Brighton Rock here. Feel free to add more info and sources etc.Amo 22:08, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fraze Gang[edit]

Fraze Gang has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this person might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (people) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe (Talk) 03:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So has Greg Fraser. NickelShoe (Talk) 03:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And so has Stevie Skreebs. If someone's put a prod tag on the first article, please don't create more on the same subject, until you've clarified why you think these folks really are notable. Switchercat ^talk_cont

You need sources. If they've been covered in magazines, that would be really great. Check out the guidelines at WP:MUSIC for more in-depth explanation of what notability means for musicians. NickelShoe (Talk) 21:38, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, it's not enough that they're real. My bedsheets are real, but they don't need an encyclopedia article. Notability means that they've been declared worth writing about before they get into Wikipedia. It also means there's enough verifiable information to actually make a decent article. NickelShoe (Talk) 21:41, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Roxy Blue[edit]

You have recently recreated or reposted material which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. -- Merope 15:26, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been protected against recreation. If you would like to contest its deletion, please request a deletion review. -- Merope 15:50, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted?[edit]

Someone give me a chance here I'm trying to improve the Roxy Blue article and everytime I do someone delets it put it back so I can at least try... PLEASE!

The article was deleted per a deletion discussion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roxy Blue. Re-creating the article is not permitted per WP's guidelines, but you can request a deletion review here. -- Merope 15:56, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Abi Harding[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, MeWiseMagic! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 16:05, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Brighton Rock (band)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Brighton Rock (band), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RJASE1 ^Talk 09:58, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Greg Fraser[edit]

A tag has been placed on Greg Fraser, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RJASE1 ^Talk 10:00, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Bai Bang (rock group)[edit]

Message posted on Thursday, April 26, 2007[edit]

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Bai Bang (rock group). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://rock.xstream.dk/site/doc.php?id=31 in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Bai Bang (rock group) with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Bai Bang (rock group) with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Bai Bang (rock group) saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Your original contributions are welcome.

Butseriouslyfolks 04:42, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Roth[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Lisa Roth, by Stormbay, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Lisa Roth fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

The subject herself does not appear to have a level of importance for encyclopedic incusion

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Lisa Roth, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Lisa Roth itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Railwayman[edit]

Railwayman has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this information might not be verifiable. Please review Wikipedia:Verifiability for the relevant policy. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so, citing reliable sources.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 12:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Repeat comedy theory[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Repeat comedy theory, by Lychosis (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Repeat comedy theory is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Repeat comedy theory, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:40, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchy music[edit]

A tag has been placed on Anarchy music, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Marwood 17:06, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Lee Smith[edit]

The article Jordan Lee Smith has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 17:23, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Bowling for Soup. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. James086^{Talk | Email} 15:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Atomic Punks (Van Halen Tribute)[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Atomic Punks (Van Halen Tribute), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tassedethe (talk) 16:46, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Avy Lee Roth[edit]

I have nominated Avy Lee Roth, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avy Lee Roth. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:42, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello MeWiseMagic! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 943 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Sean Payne (Cyanotic) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Brian James Fox - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Stevie Rachelle - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:28, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Woman in Love (Van Halen song)[edit]

I have nominated Woman in Love (Van Halen song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woman in Love (Van Halen song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:43, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Naughty Naughty (Porcelain Black song) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naughty Naughty (Porcelain Black song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naughty Naughty (Porcelain Black song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Chase (talk / contribs) 00:32, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bathroom Wall[edit]

The article Bathroom Wall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NSONG; been in CAT:NN for ten years, hence the PROD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – DarkGlow • 19:39, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]