User talk:Mhking/Archive 8

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
  1. Jan 2005 – May 2006
  2. May 2006 – Dec 2006
  3. Jan 2007 – Feb 2007
  4. Feb 2007 – Apr 2007
  5. Apr 2007 – Dec 2007
  6. Dec 2007 – Feb 2008
  7. Feb 2008 – Feb 2009
  8. Feb 2009 – Aug 2009


Speedy deletion tags

You seem to be going around putting speedy deletion tags on just about everything you can find. The artcile Organised Chaos LAN Party was tagged for speedy deletion because: "the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant" It's one of the biggest events of its kind in the world, that's significant. I think you need to contribute more, delete less. I understand that wikipedia should maintain a high standard, but I think you are deterring people from contributing.


Barnstar of Reversion2.png The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For all your work with vandalism, but especially tonight (New Years Eve), I, Sharkface217, hereby award you with this barnstar. Good job, man.S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 03:29, 1 January 2007 (UTC)


Please learn to AGF in future. No, this is not spam, and no, I am an established contributor - I'm putting another tag on until further notice. Ncmvocalist (talk) 07:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Daniel Von Clottski

I declined the speedy deletion nomination. His article mentions that he won the "Jaques Cartier Memorial Award". Although the award hasn't got an article yet, a cursory google search indicates the award is notable. If you believe the bio is unverifiable or otherwise erronous, please use AFD instead. - Mgm|(talk) 12:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

replied at article talkpage

replied at article tp.User:Yousaf465 (talk)

Deletion of the Brittany Smyth Page


I was previous warned that a more neutral way of writing would prevent this page from being deleted, and that has been what I have been working on. She is certainly a relevant and important figure in Carleton University's and CUSA's history - she was the president during an important, shaping period. Her decision to stand behind those who dropped Shinerama gave Carleton and CUSA international news and attention.

Please keep the article, and I'll do my best to make sure the information is accurate and neutral.ARMY101 (talk) 02:07, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

That is indeed why I am working to ensure that the article has verifiable and constant evidence to back it up and allow it to stay.ARMY101 (talk) 02:10, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Got it. I was under the impression that if I put the "deletion of this page is contested" banner up that it would negate the first banner.ARMY101 (talk) 14:55, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of the Information in Place, Inc. Page

I see your request to delete this page. I am trying to simply replicate other notable developer pages as shown on Serious Games. Information in Place is at least as notable as the vast majority of those developers listed on the Serious Games page. Most of those companies have similar pages. I will add references here to this company's notability in the very near future. The company is cited in a large number of cases, though I cannot add a large number in the next few hours. Please bear with me. If you still feel it should be deleted later, then I believe all companies on the Serious Games page should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Schalliol (talkcontribs) 02:53, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Stelephant Colbert

Hi Mhking. I declined the G1 speedy tag that you placed on this article because it did not qualify as Wikipedia:Patent nonsense. (For future reference, blatant hoaxes can be tagged as WP:CSD#G3-vandalism. But given some of the sources on the article, this did not appear to be a blatant hoax either.) Feel free to take it to an AfD if you think that is warranted. Best wishes, Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 03:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Please reinstate DQ Diet

I respectfully request that you reconsider your decision to delete DQ Diet. I created a page that I believe in and it seems, as a first-time contributor, I unfortunately was not compliant with your policies and/or procedures. I'd like to learn from my mistakes and not be personally attacked for an honest error. Please help. TrevorFitzy Trevorfitzy (talk) 20:44, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Might have to block him for a moment or two

If he's still at it, I'll give him a time-out. These sorts of contentless stubs cause more trouble than they're worth. Thanks for the update. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:12, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Libano, Argentina

Just a friendly note about Libano, Argentina. I declined your speedy deletion request because there was plenty of context. (Pretty easy to tell it's about a town in Argentina).--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)


If you could manage it, it'd be ace if you could mark CSD'd pages as patrolled. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 21:01, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

R. Limbaugh a Pundit??

He is just a Radio host. He wrestles while talking, he screams and cannot organize his talks. Contents are not rational. Refer to his recent talk in D.C which appeared on CNN. Citations needed to justify. I will revert it back if you do not explainor seek help from Wiki admins. Glunnbuck (talk) 03:31, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

  •  :The characterization you use (i.e., his "screaming" as evidence that he is not a pundit among other things) does fly in the face of NPOV. Please seek consensus as opposed to imposing said NPOV. --Mhking (talk) 03:33, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Read Pundit. NPOV doesnot say that this radio host is correlated to Pundit. I'm seeking consensus and therefore I'm posting this on the Limbaugh's talk page. Someone made a mistake and I'm correcting it. Please talk to me over there. I did say many things, not just that he is screaming. He is far to be called as Pundit. Thank you. Glunnbuck (talk) 03:49, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

J.S Le Fanu speedy deletion

Hi. I was wondering if you could help me to revise my web page. J.S. Le Fanu is an English writer. And I would like help to make it more noteable --Purple Black (talk) 01:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Ok. I listed the book I got the info from. It is in bullet point at the bottom --Purple Black (talk) 01:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Ok. I'll try to find some. --Purple Black (talk) 01:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Did that help at all. Also, there seems to be another page on Mr. Le Fanu. Just letting you know. --Purple Black (talk) 01:28, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


Actually, I'm not sure they understood that that was what {{db-author}} stands for. They replaced the template with a message saying "delete", which probably means they are trying to delete the page, but just don't know the code. ~SunDragon34 (talk) 04:00, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


I just wanted to tell you that you put the tag warning on the wrong user page i did not create it. Cheers Kyle1278 (talk) 01:14, 11 March 2009 (UTC) No problem just telling you.:) Kyle1278 (talk) 01:16, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


It's not a speedy delete. It's not NEAR a speedy delete. Please be more careful, when tagging. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:26, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Continuing. You're creating vandalism now, not reverting it. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:42, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Ragging Deaths was not Wikipedia:Patent nonsense. Speedy declined. Please stop. Continuing bad tagging after this third notice will find you blocked. Toddst1 (talk) 02:38, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Jody Watley

I need help. There is a reference to a 'Midori' which is apparently some sort of stage name for a Michelle Watley who according to Wikipedia worked in the porn industry and is 'said to be her sister'.

This information appears in Watley's Shalamar Years (1977-1984). Because the information appears without context to the subject, I deleted it, and was cited for vandalism. I did post questions in talk to address my concerns, though no one has responded. I have read my concerns are better addressed with an administrator. I hope you can help me with this.

If this Michelle Watley (Midori) information is listed in the 'Personal Life' section, my question is what is the relevance to the article?

There are no sources given that would make the information credible, which is part of the Wikipedia guidlelines; which clearly state: "Proper sourcing always depends on context: common sense and editorial judgment are an indispensable part of the process. While the reporting of rumors has a news value, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and should only provide information verified by reliable sources. Wikipedia is not the place for passing along gossip and rumors. Further, 'Exceptional Claims' Require Exceptional Sources, which would include "surprising claims not covered by the 'mainstream media': I would argue 'porn' would not fall under mainstream, and feels very much like gossip. I would definitely regard it as a 'surprising claim', as I have never seen this in the mainstream media. Jody Watley has been in the mainstream media since she was a prominent dancer on Soul Train in the 70's.[1]

Also included in analyzing this subject matter would be the Wiki guidelines of 'Exceptional Claims' would be anything which would alter mainstream assumptions, especially in... biographies of living persons. These claims would then require, according to Wikipedia 'High Quality Sources'." None of the criteria seems met here, which is also why I deleted this information in the article. Please explain, or delete the information.

Perhaps you can explain it further, the necessity and relevance beyond family members/personal life, especially since inclusion seems to violate Wikipedia policy. Most other artists pages of which I have visited and read, have personal information (family, husbands, relationships. etc) primarily in the 'Personal Life' section, not randomly placed within the context of an article. Is there a different standard in this case?

With the very arbitrary inclusion of 'porn star' as it is appears in the 'Shalamar Years',it seems solely intended to distract or damage Jody Watley somehow since she the artist we are reading about. I would say this especially since this Midori reference has nothing to do with her music. My question was, was this person doing porn in 1977-1984? Where are the sources? If there are no sources, according to Wikipedia the information "should be deleted immediately". So why was my deletion reverted and why was it called 'vandalism'? Did I miss a step?

'Porn' is not even referenced in the mainstream 'high quality' media sources as such. Generally speaking the language 'Adult films', 'Adult film stars, etc. is used.[2]. It seems even when replacing the word 'porn' to 'adult' - for some odd reason this too get reverted. Please explain this as well.

In Jody Watley 'Bio in My Own Words', she doesn't even mention a sister, which further creates doubt, and also highly probable that even is she has a sister, she is of little significance or influence with Jody's music[3], further making the inclusion irrelevant.

Solution: The information should be deleted from the article, and if you feel it's necessary to remain, then it should only be in 'Personal Life', along with information about her brother. My sole intent is to make the article the best representation of this artist, and I always include references and credible sources. Thank You.--Diamondsandpearls (talk) 17:32, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Jody Watley and sister

Apologies. You missed my point. My point is not with the subject of whether or not she is the sister or not, that's really a secondary issue. Other people seemed stuck on that point. That was not my question.

My issue is in relation to the relevance to the article with regard to Shalamar, where one learns of this. What is the relevance to The Shalamar Years (1977-1984)?

Was Michelle/Midori doing adult films these years, while Watley was launching her career in the group? I deleted the info from the 'Shalamar Years 1977-1984) section, and simply placed it where it was at least in some context. It was reverted.

If you read the article, it appears totally out of context to the the subject, arbitrarily placed. Where is the source that these films were also occurring in 1977-1984?

If there is no context, and no highly regarded source according to Wikipedia it should be removed. Blender Magazine wasn't even around in 1977-1984.Blender Magazine, was first published in 1994. In addition, if Blender printed the information, they could have simply gotten it from Wikipedia. With all due respect it is debatable if Blender would be considered notable source. As well, it would be impossible for them to have printed anything in 1977-1984 because the magazine didn't even exist.

This is not me trying to do a is she or isn't she - it's all irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. How does it relate the The Shalamar Years - other than someone deciding that the subject matter related to 'porn' should appear, regardless of how out of context it is. That is my issue. Why for instance wouldn't this appear in the article at whatever point Watley was in her creative career? If it's a must for a very limited group people.

Once again, I'm not a part of the if Michelle/Midori is her sister or not. I tried to be clear about this, but it's the only thing you replied to, and nowhere in my comments do I recall challenging if she is her sister or not. I simply stated, she isn't mentioned in the Jody Watley 'Bio In My Own Words'. I am trying to improve the article, with regard to the artist career, which is what a bio is supposed to be about - not to do family tree investigations.

In terms of the whether or not the Myspace Page is Jody Watley, clearly it is - it's 'Official Jody Watley', with personal photo's, behind the scenes video's, blogs and links to her record label, publicist, booking, etc. She also makes reference to Wiki editors in giving references/sources to her bio, it's doubtful someone other the artist would go to such lengths. I would add, I know for a fact her page is not a fabrication, and if required I could certainly give verification that the page is that of Jody Watley. Do you need a notarized letter, a video post declaring the page is indeed her page? Respectfully asking.

In addition, if you are going to imply the 'Jody Watley Official Myspace Page" could be a fabrication, why have you (not you personally, rather Wiki) listed the Michelle Watley Page as a reference - when there is no information on that there which indicates she was doing pornography in 1977 - 1984 nor do I see anything that says they are sisters. I'm sure there must be a great number of people who share the same last name in the world - but once again, I am not focused on is she is or isn't she a sister or not. But since you mentioned it, how do you know that page actually belongs to Michelle Watley/Midori or not? How do you know that page isn't a fabrication? Is there a different standard? Lastly, why am I not allowed to change the language from 'porn' to 'adult', as it's and in line with the mainstream? Why not simply move an improved sentence to later in the article?

For instance if Michelle/Midori started doing adult films in the 90's or 00's (?) - wouldn't it appear later in the article in that context? Example: Reportedly known to have a sister named Michelle who adopted the professional name of 'Midori' in ( list year she assumed the name with source/reference), who went on to star in adult films during this time... or something to that effect. Though it would still be completely out of context to Watley's music career, at least it wouldn't be so arbitrary. Why would making that adjustment constitute vandalism?

Lastly, I still don't understand why this isn't left to the 'Personal Life', in the first place with a highly regarded citation for people who want to know about her family. Those are my numerous questions. Not if she is her sister or not. Thank You--Diamondsandpearls (talk) 21:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


How is changing "Connecticut" to "UConn" vandalism? When I graduate from there in 1981, no one called it "Connecticut," everyone called it UConn. What did they call it when you graduated from there? Besides, Connecticut is the name of small private college in New London, Connecticut. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 21:00, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Besides, go online and read the Hartford Courant or the local television stations (WFSB TV 3, WTNH TV8, and WVIT TV 30). The entire local medial calls it "UConn," no one calls it "Connecticut." Also, the team's nickname "Huskies" only works with "UConn" (ie, like the dog who pulls a sled, a "Yukon Husky"). If the university was called "Connecticut," wouldn't a more appropriate nickname be something like the "Nutmeggers"? The school is UConn, and I did NOT commit vandalism! Marty in Boulder,3/29/2009 (talk) 21:07, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Why did you not "AGF," that is, assume that my changing "Connecticut" to "UConn" was done in good faith? Aren't Wikipedia contributors suppposed to make that assumption about other Wikipedia contributors? Instead, you tagged me as a vandal. I would never do anything to hurt the University of Connecticut. Nor, in my hundreds of revisions to Wikipedia, have I ever vandalized a single article. In my four years at the school and my 30 years living in Connecticut, I never heard of anyone referring to it as "Connecticut"; it was always called "UConn." In fact, we were instructed to call it "UConn" during freshman orientation ("always with a upper case 'C,' never with a lower case 'C,'" the person who ran the orientation said). But, I admit that I have lived in Colorado for twelve years now, and maybe things back in Connecticut have changed. But, nonetheless, my revision was done in good faith, and I don't appreciate being labeled as a vandal.

Marty in Boulder, March 20, 2009. (talk) 22:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Chrome: A merger or Deletion then Rebirth?


I'm asking for you to weigh your opinion about Chrome being a merged channel or a channel deleted then reborn on the Talk:XM Satellite Radio channel history page.

Thank You TravKoolBreeze (talk) 19:55, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


Hi I saw you mentioned that DirecTV has plans to add MSNBC HD upon launch on List of DirecTV channels#Future DirecTV channels but the source you referenced has nothing about DirecTV in it, its just about the HD launch itself, so I removed it per WP:CRYSTAL. Do you have a source that specifically says DirecTV WILL add it upon launch? TomCat4680 (talk) 17:34, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

No worries; I misplaced the original article (which is pretty old in and of itself) -- but in it, it includes MSNBC among HD channels DirecTV would add upon launching. In any event, the article itself is old, and given that many HD channel additions previously promised and announced have been put off by DirecTV (E!, Style, Travel Channel, Hallmark Movie Channel,, I wouldn't be surprised if they held off on launching until D12 reaches orbit late this summer or early this fall. So, leaving MSNBC off the list is not a problem in my mind.... --mhking (talk) 17:51, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Ok well it'd be a great if it could be confirmed that MSNBC HD will be on DirecTV upon launch. Hey by any chance are you "DodgerKing" on any TV forums such as, SatelliteGuys.US or TomCat4680 (talk) 17:53, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
No, I'm not DodgerKing...I go as mhking on all three forums, though I am more quiet than I used to be on those forums.... --mhking (talk) 18:25, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

CSD of Nuala Wolfe

Hi there. I took the liberty of placing a hangon since I had tagged A7 before you but withdrawn after finding some sources. I posted what I found on the talk page as the rationale. The article is poor to say the least but we should't WP:BITE the newbies either, and I believe borderline notability can be established. Anyway, just wanted to let you know about it, hope you don't mind. Cheers, MLauba (talk) 22:37, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

CSD for Obama Street

Hi. I just wanted to give you an FYI that I traded the CSD on this article to vandalism for malicious redirects. I also modified the text to prevent Obama Street to being redirected to Bush street. Best regards. --OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 03:55, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

Information.svg Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Life on Mars (U.S. TV series). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. mhking (talk) 00:00, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

I will do as I wish. This is a free country.Mdriver1981 (talk) 00:04, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey there!

Thank you for the warm welcome!

I'm sorry about the pointless article I started. I was not aware that I wasn't allowed to reserve it for later tonight, but i've learnt from my mistakes and i'll only begin an article when I am not busy!

Thanks again for the welcoming and you're doing a very good job at managing articles! Roudan (talk) 00:15, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Cinema Studies Student Union

Hey Mhking, I added information to the page to show how it is notable. Please let me know if it is enough to not be deleted. Thanks! (Jazzyjpl (talk) 04:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC))


Hi there. I defended the article over at Christopher Howard Wolf and would really appreciate (seriously) the help requested. Only wish to make it suitable, no matter what info or links need to be removed for it to not be seen as advertising, and as a legitimate wikipedia informational article. Thank you for your time! -- Taffypuller (talk) 03:54, 22 April 2009 (UTC)


Dear Mhking

Thank you for your help with Vodennikov article.

Nex time you add a clean-up tag, please specify what should be cleaned up - it would make my task much easier.

As for the Russian books - Vodennikov is a Russian poet, therefore his books are in Russian. And it doesn't make much sense to make an article about a poet without listing his books: the books are what poets are for. If you look at articles about Arthur Rimbaud, Pablo Neruda or Nobel winning Wisława Szymborska or novelists Kenzaburo Oe or Naguib Mahfouz, you will see that listing a writers's books in his native language is a norm - just as spelling his name in his native script.

Best regards, Vryadly —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vryadly (talkcontribs) 16:35, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Vandalisim for the Sceance

Mhiking I 'm telling you one thing this is not vandalising. This is called editing. You did't read this book. You said this is vandalising it is not. You have been vandalising on the article Rhe Seance. I want you to go read the book The Seance on your libary. The yougo back and write the article. Hahayu —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:19, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Mhking stop deleting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hahayu (talkcontribs) 20:14, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Local Executives of Barugo (Past to Present)

I've declined your speedy tag, as there is some inherent notability in former governing bodies. Though I don't believe this qualifies as a speedy candidate, I'm not sure that it could or should survive a deletion debate. If you'd like, consider taking this to WP:AfD. AniMatetalk 10:53, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

FES Matriculation School

Hi, just letting you know I've removed your speedy template from FES Matriculation School because you requested deletion under A7, which does not apply to schools. Cheers - Kingpin13 (talk) 11:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

A commmon action to take would be merging this into the town that the school is in. However, the article doesn't reveal it's location. I'd suggest a prod (for little content) and if that gets removed, either AfD or follow this. - Kingpin13 (talk) 12:03, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Kristyan Ferrer

Information.svg Hi, I removed your speedy deletion tag from this article. In my opinion there is a credible claim of importance or significance in the article. Remember that criterion A7 is for articles that makes no credible claims of significance. Consider PROD or AfD instead.

In fact, I think this is not even close to being an A7 candidate, and I advise you to be more judicious in the future. decltype (talk) 12:29, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

I would have much preferred a more lengthy process for editing the article concerned after discussions rather than rush comments by colleague User:decltype. And I certainly wouldn't have approved deleting the tag without further discussions. Tags should stay until conflicts are resolved. In any case, now that colleague (User:Mhking has referred it to deletion, let's have the comments there at and hopefully the Kristyan Ferrer article can be saved as what's at issue is a notable actor in a majour role in an award-winning majour movie Sin Nombre (2009 film) werldwayd (talk) 15:27, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
What "rush comments" are you referring to? I was merely pointing out that the article was not suitable for speedy deletion. Either way, a week should be more than enough to improve the article. decltype (talk) 05:44, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


You deleted this entry about thirty seconds after it was posted. The joke may only last a day or so, but if the new logo for the GOP catches on, we will need an entry. I wanted to include a picture (cute), which I have in a gif file, but I couldn't figure out how to do it.Jim Lacey (talk) 15:57, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Goposaurus, again

My comment was that if Goposaurus catches on, Wikipedia should have an entry. The entry would not contribute to the term catching on, as you suggest, since only those looking it up would see the entry. Besides, what harm is this brief entry doing? Jim Lacey (talk) 15:30, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

speedies and twinkle

Friendly suggestion: Nobody can really check speedies properly at the rate you are going., though you are not making many mistakes. Twinkle is an aid in doing the mechanics, not a substitute for thinking--and , when appropriate, doing a preliminary search. It might add some balance if you did some other sort of editing also. DGG (talk) 23:49, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

I declined the A7 speedy you placed on Andrea Crisanti, an award-winning production designer. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 03:32, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Naaman Roosevelt

Please don´t delete the article ,just think about his a future NFL player--Zta (talk) 02:56, 16 May 2009 (UTC) Nastia


I declined the speedy deletion request on Biospace. I suggest taking it to AfD. LadyofShalott 03:02, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

I am requesting an explanation as to why you wish this article to be speedily deleted.Salemmaman (talk) 03:18, 2 June 2009 (UTC)salemmaman

I have nominated, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. mhking (talk) 18:53, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

I visited the link as you suggested and this was the only explanation you offered: "Self-promotion of margnially notable Web site". You say that I am welcome to edit the article to address these concerns, how does one rectify your claim that is marginally notable? I'd like to resolve this issue with you once and for all since I see this is not the first time you've nominated the article for deletion.Salemmaman (talk) 22:51, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

I've gone through the trouble of posting just a few of the many sources of news stories on KTN both on your deletion page and my talk page. Please respond at your convenience.Salemmaman (talk) 22:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

I appreciate your help in this issue, thanks for requesting a speedy end to the deletion process.Salemmaman (talk) 00:20, 10 June 2009 (UTC)


Why did you redirect penguin chat 3 to club penguin?--RatónBat TALK 2 ME! 14:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Courtesy note

Over at WP:SPAM someone is asking whether or not the presence of a redirect from National Coney Island to Coney Island (restaurant) means that there should be a link to the restaurant. Since you originally created the redirect I thought I would keep you in the loop. On the page I guessed at the reason, but only you know for sure. Of couse the edit is two+ years old so I am sure you remember the exact moment and circumstances.  :) Cheers!

pooh deletion

Hi, saw that you had prod'd the untitled winnie the pooh page at one time. Thought you'd want to see the deletion discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Winnie the Pooh Project SpikeJones (talk) 04:00, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Steve P Miller (software developer)

Please check the chat page of the page in question.

Regards, Raven.

--RavenRawr (talk) 22:48, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

a further edit has been made offering 2 new websites (both credible also) which prove cridt to steve p miller.--RavenRawr (talk) 23:31, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Thomas The Conquerer & The Mighty 4

It is a well known story in Wales, albeit very compelling to be a hoax, but Thomas The Conquerer is well documented in Welsh history. //Melonite (talk) 19:43, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Only Joking ;-) - Totally agree with the CSD //Melonite (talk) 19:45, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Removed speedy deletion tag: Roguing

Hi Mhking! I just wanted to inform you that I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on Roguing- because: the page is not nonsense - there is meaningful content. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. decltype (talk) 03:09, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

7th street theater tv show removal

Thanks for letting me know.what I do not get is why it got is a fairly popular show.I even gave the website.I really think it should have a page its one of the best drama shows ever.maybe I messed up some how I dont know.--Sweetheart2009 (talk) 21:59, 28 June 2009 (UTC)sweetheart2009

Crying Lightning

I may have been mistaken tagging it. Unless it falls under WP:CRYSTAL... think this might actually be one of the band members? Since the band IS notable; even so that'd mean COI technically. -WarthogDemon 01:50, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Is It A Good Idea To Microwave This?

Just for the hell of it, you should have a look at this article's history--it's pretty bizar. Drmies (talk) 03:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


Hello. I was wondering if you could send me The Parodizers article which was deleted? My email is Thank you

Dwight1555 (talk) 23:00, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Dwight

Japanese Cigarettes

Now hold on a minute now! I am not done yet. I am currently working on several pages about japanese cigarretts as we speak. Have some patience. (LonerXL (talk) 22:18, 5 July 2009 (UTC))


This article is not nonsense. Everything in it is true, and the term was used rather prominently a couple of years ago in a Harvey's TV commercial. But the article is unencyclopedic, unlikely to become viable, and Wiktionary already has an entry for it, so I prodded the whole thing. -- Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 02:19, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Altered Speedy Deletion rationale: Mikey smits

Hello Mhking, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I have deleted a page you tagged (Mikey smits) under a different criteria, because the one you provided was inappropriate or incorrect. CSD criteria are narrow and specific, and the process is more effective if the correct deletion rationale is supplied. Consider reviewing the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any queries, please let me know. Thanks again! decltype (talk) 02:53, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

False speedy deletion tag

I removed the speedy deletion tag you put on Blue marble energy. The article clearly did not meet that criterion at all. Looking at your talk page you've obviously had a lot of problems with this. Maybe you should refrain from using the CSD templates until you know how to use them correctly. —Noisalt (talk) 00:03, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

The criterion had nothing to do with notability. Read what it said. Speedy deletion is what ruins this site for new users, so I don't have warm feelings for people who misuse it. —Noisalt (talk) 00:48, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

People TV

Hi, thanks for your help with the PTV article. Hopefully in time we can find more sources to fill out the articles. -bonkeykong —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonkeykong (talkcontribs) 21:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

DiBella's Pizza

I did not mean to cause any trouble with the article, as this website is sectacular and i respect its criterias, is it possible that you read my tag on the talk page of the pizzeria. Thanks Juve10 (talk) 23:50, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Ken Kam

this isn't copyrighted material, but i edited it anyway. (Cylonagen (talk) 03:13, 2 August 2009 (UTC))

got your message. anyway, it's updated, can we take off the auto deletion tags. it's a stub. also, i need to redirect, lower case k. (Cylonagen (talk) 03:21, 2 August 2009 (UTC))


Why delete the kidofdoom article? They are indeed a band that exists and have released an album (for which I've also created a page). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stuntmanelvis (talkcontribs) 12:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Honor your father and your mother

Hi there. You redirected the above to Ten Commandments and the creator has undone this and requested a dialogue on consensus. I think it ought to be a rdr as well and have proposed such on the talk page. Cheers SGGH ping! 23:35, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

न्यूक्लियर मेडिसिन (गामा स्कैनिंग)

Hi. Which foreign language Wikipedia is it from? I can't find it. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:54, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

When I hovered over the original article, I thought it said that it was on the Indian version of WP, though I could be mistaken. --mhking (talk) 11:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Ah, thanks. I couldn't find a text string match, but that's not definitive. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:58, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Yuko Yamashita

Hi Mhking,

I notice that you marked my recent article on Yuko Yamashita as being 'patrolled'; I'm not sure why this was done as she strikes me as an interesting person that people will be interested in reading about. She is the inventor of the world's first non-damaging straightening hair system; a system that is used across the world in all the top salons. Would you like me to provide more information surrounding her invention or her background? Please advise. Many thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marinelf (talkcontribs) 17:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

MhKing, you appear to have deleted the entry on Yuko Yamashita only a day after marking it as a candidate for deletion. Could you please inform me as to why it was removed; what could have been added to it to make it more 'notable'? Yuko Yamashita is an internationally renowned inventor, and worked hard to have her invention patented by the Japenese government in the mid 90s. She has been successful on a global level and her invention is a recognised household name in the finest hair establishments on the planet, yet she is deemed not 'notable'? if this is a question of documentation and references, I would very much appreciate it if you granted me a chance to amend it appropriately. I did previously request information on how to make this more notable, but you did not feedback, simply removed the entry.

Please advise.

Many thanks, Marinelf —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marinelf (talkcontribs) 13:04, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Annie Jr.

Hello you have put my article up for deletion Annie jr. As you see, I disagree with this because it is a published, successful children's play that is performed worldwide and has recived rave reviews from audience members. I don't feel it is fan fiction (for it relates to the musical and film in many ways) in any way. Please take this into consideration. Thank you! -Cmonkey1103 (talk) 23:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Elite TV delete nomination

Why have you nominated the Elite TV article for deletion as it isn't advertising it is telling people about the channel like the other article on here are doing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scorpio95 (talkcontribs) 14:33, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Barry Kirkey Article

mhking, work with me here brother. why do you have to be so strict, i mean look at how much time and effort i've put into creating this article. Don't just delete it, let me know what i need to change.

update: I don't understand, im a fan of Kirkey and im a fan of the his show and his accomplishments so thats why i decided to make him a wikipedia page.

I not sure what you mean by "pure promotion and little substance." all i've done was state his accomplishments a tell the reader who barry kirkey is through the article, if you read the article you will see that.

Also the sources im using, are the direct sources of where i learned all the information about Kirkey.

also what do you mean exactly when you say independent and verifiable sources?

Please work with me here, if you need anything removed or changed in the article, please just let me know, im want to make this work out.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Hunter54321 (talkcontribs) 22:01, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: HuHot Mongolian Grill & Barbeque

Hello Mhking, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of HuHot Mongolian Grill & Barbeque - a page you tagged - because: Not unambiguously promotional. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:56, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Research before deletion of Fungi article

I wonder could you elaborate on what research you did before you recommended the deletion of the Fungi the Dingle Dolphin page? I presume you wouldn't flag a page for deletion before at least doing a google search?
Thanks Pnelnik (talk) 09:34, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

It would have been better if we could have had at the very least a few days of discussion as to whether the article should remain or be deleted. No discussion has taken place thus far. From the first time it was suggested that the original article should be deleted until the final deletion just 16 minutes were given, it was some time after 2am in my time-zone and alas I was asleep.
Further, I'd welcome contributions to the discussion as to whether the original article should remain. The question is how note-worthy are the articles about Fungi in The Irish Independent [4], The Irish Times [5]? How important is it that Fungi has been mentioned on both the BBC [6] web-site and the New York Times[7]? Is it relevant that RTE [8] has broadcast a documentary about Fungi.
Also a google search for fungi dingle dolphin gives over 11,000 hits.
Thanks Pnelnik (talk) 10:35, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Why are you deleting my article Naraka (Hinduism)?

Every single paragraph is accurately sourced to the Shrimad-Bhagavatam a very important and popular Hindu Book. Every single paragraph has its own source, so how can you say it is un-sourced or personal research? I spent hours on this page and made sure I sourced every single thing I wrote. Please let me know. It is sourced on in every paragraph. It is much better sourced than Naraka (Buddhism) which barely has any sources. In this article every thing I wrote I provided a source underneath. Thank You.Eronel189 (talk) 03:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

It seems that there is a recurring theme on this discussion page. Mhking is be deleting numerous new articles, when in fact there are good reasons to keep them. (talk) 08:34, 20 August 2009 (UTC)