User talk:Milece

Nonsuch Mansion

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Nonsuch Mansion, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.nonsuch-mansion.co.uk/about.htm. As a copyright violation, Nonsuch Mansion appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Nonsuch Mansion has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Nonsuch Mansion. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Nonsuch Mansion, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Garion96 (talk) 01:29, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rug Muncher

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Rug Muncher, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Peripitus (Talk) 10:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Flra_cultural_contents1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Flra_cultural_contents1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:57, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Split of BitTorrent

I've reverted your split to BitTorrent for several reasons. You did a copy-and-paste from one article to another without indicating it in the edit summary. Also, the article to which you've pasted the contents is not the appropriate target. Mind matrix 14:20, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Friarycourt500.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Friarycourt500.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:59, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Titanic (1997 film) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. jj137 (talk) 02:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of St. Pontianus

A tag has been placed on St. Pontianus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. скоморохъ 18:06, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

In a recent edit to the page List of Meerkat Manor meerkats, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, you can ask me on my talk page or you can visit the help desk. Thank you. The spelling in this list is correct, and several of your changes resulted in bad grammar. This is a featured list and has been well reviewed and copyedited. Collectonian (talk) 21:14, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

United States 2008 Presidential Election Battleground States

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article United States 2008 Presidential Election Battleground States, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of United States 2008 Presidential Election Battleground States. J Milburn (talk) 11:50, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of United States 2008 Presidential Election Battleground States

I have nominated United States 2008 Presidential Election Battleground States, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States 2008 Presidential Election Battleground States. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Sceptre ^(talk) 21:56, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"battleground states" article reincarnated

Hey, what's up. I'm creating a new site for deleted wikipedia articles, and I'm auto-importing some of them now. I ran across this one and figured you'd like to know it still existed somewhere (looks like a lot of work went into it) -- http://wikiunderground.net/w/index.php?title=United_States_2008_Presidential_Election_Battleground_States Tlogmer ( talk / contributions ) 22:43, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Section titles

Please do not change the capitalization of sections. Only the first letter is capitalized. Please see WP:HEAD:

The initial letter of a title is capitalized (except in very rare cases, such as eBay). Otherwise, capital letters are used only where implied by normal capitalization rules (Funding of UNESCO projects, not Funding of UNESCO Projects).

∴ Therefore cogito·sum 17:02, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the second request to stop capitalizing section titles contrary to Wikipedia guidelines as you did at Channel Tunnel. Thanks. ∴ Therefore cogito·sum 03:28, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Milece! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 318 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Freddie Gruber - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:35, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Indie Boyz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Indie Boyz, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Atlantic306 (talk) 18:39, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Indie Boyz

The article Indie Boyz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotion for a non-notable porn company, a case of WP:PROMO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:02, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]