User talk:Model Citizen

Welcome!

Hello, Model Citizen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Svest 23:38, 11 December 2005 (UTC) ^{Wiki me up}[reply]

Award

Thanks for the award. Do you have a particular area that you prefer to work in? CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 21:34, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I started off with Weather and aircraft and then found that there was lots of ohter stuff to help out in by going through the Recent changes page. I find I end up editing articles even if I know nothing about them. Spelling, vadalism, general tidy, etc. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 22:12, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Statistics

Hello. Try write to User:Angela and User:Woohookitty. Hopefully they'll give you some feedback. If you'll have something on your mind in future, just let me know. - Darwinek 19:14, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Test Track

I (hopefully temporarily) removed the statement that Test Track is the most popular ride at Epcot. Where did you get this piece of information? This is something that really needs to be supported by numbers or something solid, because it's the sort of thing that travel guides and such are really inaccurate about. ManoaChild 21:01, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

game posted on Fritz page

Could you please post the full move list of the chess game that you posted an image of on the Fritz page? Hayne 23:25, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for posting the initial moves (on my talk page). Here's a PGN of the whole game, with some notes I added while analyzing it with Hiarcs 10 - it seems strange that Fritz would go out of book so early (with an arguable bad move) and also make so many small and large mistakes latter on. Are you sure your Fritz is set up correctly?

[Event "ModelCitizen game from Fritz Wikipedia page"] [Site "?"] [Date "2006.01.05"] [Round "?"] [White "Fruit2.2"] [Black "Fritz8"] [Result "1-0"] [Annotator "Hiarcs 10"]

1. e4 Nf6 2. e5 Nd5 3. d4 d6 4. Nf3 Nc6 5. Bb5 Bf5 {Fritz goes out of book - mainline is} (5... a6 {Hiarcs evals the game position as +1.1 for White}) 6. O-O a6 7. Bxc6+ bxc6 8. Nh4 Qd7 9. Re1 Bg4 10. Qd3 dxe5 11. h3 Be6 12. dxe5 Nb4 13. Qe4 Rb8 14. Nc3 c5 15. Rd1 Qc6 16. Qe2 Nd5 {Hiarcs says this was a mistake. It suggested instead} (16... g5 17. Bxg5 Rg8 {With the game move, Hiarcs eval is +1.9 for White}) 17. Ne4 h6 {Hiarcs says this was a mistake. It suggested instead} (17... Nb6 {eval is now +2.6 for White}) 18. c4 Nb6 19. Qf3 Qa8 20. b3 Nd7 21. Bb2 a5 {Hiarcs says this is a mistake. It suggests instead} (21... g6) 22. Rd3 a4 {Again Hiarcs says Black needs to do} (22... g6 {eval now +3.0 for White}) 23. Rad1 Qa5 {Hiarcs says this is a mistake (eval now +3.6 for White). It suggests instead} (23... Rh7) 24. Nf5 axb3 25. axb3 Qb6 26. Nfg3 Rd8 {Hiarcs says this is a huge mistake (eval now +8.6 for White). Again it suggests} (26... g6 {although Black is already lost (eval +4.5 for White)}) 27. Nh5 c6 28. Nf4 Bf5 29. e6 Rh7 30. exf7+ Kxf7 31. Ng3 Bxd3 32. Nd5+ 1-0

Hayne 10:58, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for the nice message. It's always good to be appreciated! :-) htonl 01:17, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

spaces before unit symbols

Hi, thank you for adding temperatures to Foja Mountains.

I reformatted 30° C to 30 °C. This is because the space comes between the digit and the unit symbol (Manual of style). The unit symbol is a composite '°C' and does not have an internal space.

I just thought I would let you know. I would be happy if you want to discuss this more. Keep up the good work. bobblewik 10:44, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ellis Island Casino & Brewery

Please explain why your articles are notable. I almost deleted this but... well, being a casino is not necessarily notable. You must explain what makes it notable. gren グレン ^? 06:20, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, any semi-major casino, yes. However a local establishment can be a casino. Could you say how many people are employed? Its budget? Something to show that it's not your run of the mill restaurant with gambling or whatnot. gren グレン ^? 17:22, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Goetz

Rachel Goetz has been proposed for deletion. Please see the article for details. NickelShoe 22:37, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I neither proposed nor supported the deletion. I simply saw fit to inform you about it. You want to deprod it, I'm not sending to AfD (though someone else might). NickelShoe 22:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is it malfunctioning?

I saw it removed an image from the Yamaha FZ1 page that has complete copyright info, and the photographer, who doesn't want to be named, is in the summary and released it worldwide. What more info can be added? All the correct info was put in when the picture was uploaded as far as I can tell by Snowfalcon. What else is there to add except summary, licensing, - the source was my own computer - do I have to put that on there as the source? Model Citizen 03:41, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OrphanBot's working just fine: the image had a "nosource" tag on it, and OrphanBot considers "no source" to be more authoritative than any tag but {{GFDL-self}} or {{PD-self}}. A statement of "no rights reserved" by itself is meaningless: without knowing the photographer, there is no way of verifying that the tag is correct. --Carnildo 04:58, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Sharapova

Hey there. I noticed you made a few very good edits to Maria Sharapova. I would just like to say thank you, and I hope for more constructive edits to Wikipedia from you. Noelle De Guzman (talk) 11:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:2002 AcuraRL.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:2002 AcuraRL.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -SCEhard T 04:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright conflict

Hi - At Image:James Dean Memorial.JPG you wrote "Photographer releases all rights worldwide." which equates to {{PD-self}}, but you put a {{GFDL}} license on the image. Please choose one and delete the other. -SCEhard T 04:41, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it looks like you did this on a bunch of images. Please check them all. Thanks! -SCEhard T 04:42, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1980s JVC Boombox.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:1980s JVC Boombox.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Ronald20 02:53, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Sierra Vista Mall

An article that you have been involved in editing, Sierra Vista Mall, has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sierra Vista Mall. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

--TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 00:27, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Username barnstar...

...there really needs to be one. I keep seeing people who have the greatest usernames ever... 68.39.174.238 22:36, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Larissa Meek.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Larissa Meek.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 05:36, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Whisfalls2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Whisfalls2.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then you need to specify who owns the copyright, please. If you got it from a website, then a link to the website where it was taken from with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:46, 13 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Oden 05:46, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Middle verse of the Bible

I've nominated Middle verse of the Bible, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Middle verse of the Bible satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middle verse of the Bible and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Middle verse of the Bible during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Inkpaduta 05:57, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Sierra Vista Mall

Sierra Vista Mall, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Sierra Vista Mall satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sierra Vista Mall (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Sierra Vista Mall during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:58, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Manchester Center

I have nominated Manchester Center, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchester Center. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 06:53, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ocean Drive2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ocean Drive2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chinese_316.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Chinese_316.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 22:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:BH&G.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BH&G.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --12:52, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Pollasky Ave. Clovis.JPG

File:Pollasky Ave. Clovis.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Pollasky Ave. Clovis.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Pollasky Ave. Clovis.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:24, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Integratron4.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Integratron4.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 06:39, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Telegraph office at depot.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Telegraph office at depot.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 06:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Samantha Trenk

I have nominated Samantha Trenk, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha Trenk. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Donnie Park (talk) 17:23, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brian Worth

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Brian Worth, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Notability have never gone beyond reality TV, therefore fails to pass a single WP:BIO guideline

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Donnie Park (talk) 18:20, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Model Citizen! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 6 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Hamid Shirvani - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 16:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Fritz 8.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Fritz 8.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:37, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PROD

Proposed deletion of Memorial Heroes of Chernobyl

The article Memorial Heroes of Chernobyl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a non-notable non-event

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 05:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Palm reading house.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Palm reading house.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 13:32, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Liggett Select.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Liggett Select.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 08:42, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ocean Drive (magazine)

The article Ocean Drive (magazine) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sourced only to WP:PRIMARY circulation figures.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 15:46, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeff Coetzee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeff Coetzee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Coetzee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 21:02, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Sun-maid Raisins.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sun-maid Raisins.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Primm Valley Resort pool.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Primm Valley Resort pool.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:14, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Bell Pull.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Bell Pull.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:29, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Whiskey Pete's at night.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Whiskey Pete's at night.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Braun razor.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Braun razor.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 08:55, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cima, California.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cima, California.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 08:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Claim Jumper Restaurant.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Claim Jumper Restaurant.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:00, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clovis High School.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Clovis High School.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:33, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Pismo Beach.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Pismo Beach.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Hall tree edited.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Hall tree edited.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:28, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Clovis High School.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Clovis High School.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:39, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Christian Donninger

The article Christian Donninger has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pensacola Bay

For your creation of the article, Pensacola Bay, on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Navarre, Florida, I would like to award you the following:

	Wikipedians of Navarre Creation Award-Silver Class
	This user has been awarded the Wikipedians of Navarre Creation Award at a Silver Class Rank. This means that this user has created at least one new article about Navarre, Florida, or its corresponding topics. And has been awarded in kind.

Navarre0107 (talk) 16:04, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hall tree for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hall tree is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hall tree until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- NoCOBOL (talk) 12:05, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Better Homes and Gardens (magazine cover).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Better Homes and Gardens (magazine cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Neon Message Board.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Neon Message Board.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 03:09, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Trains in Copenhagen.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Trains in Copenhagen.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 03:11, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]