Jump to content

User talk:Namayan/Archive 02

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There's a new Map of Manila

I've updated the Manila map you've wanted me to update for the longest time. See the Tambayan for the details. =) --seav 10:21, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Fixed DBTI to DBTC. --seav 06:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ph_seal_abra_lacub.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ph_seal_abra_lacub.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ph seal basilan isabela city.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ph seal basilan isabela city.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:37, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


Orphaned fair use image (Image:Antipolo_City_Seal.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Antipolo_City_Seal.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. bluemask (talk) 14:42, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ph seal isabela maconacon.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ph seal isabela maconacon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:40, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ph_seal_negros_occidental_bago_city.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment

Would you mind weighing in on this debate? --evrik (talk) 15:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ph_seal_negros_occidental_cadiz_city.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:02, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ph_seal_negros_occidental_himamaylan_city.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Legislative districts of Davao del Norte

I really like your articles on the legislative districts of the Philippines. Great job! I'm currently making a map showing all the districts (with an inset for Metro Manila), even daring to include Kalayaan municipality in the Spratlys. It won't be finished though until I figure out how to properly divide Maguindanao/Shariff Kabunsuan, Caloocan, Antipolo, Parañaque and Davao City, as well as the new divisions in Taguig-Pateros, Zamboanga Sibugay and Sultan Kudarat.

I found just one error so far in the articles, in Davao del Norte. According to this COMELEC Resolution, San Isidro belongs to the same district as that of its mother municipalities, Asuncion and Kapalong (DDN's 1st district). The NSCB adds a bit of confusion, as it still displays the incorrect designations for the two districts of the province. I could've moved it myself but I'm afraid of making errors in the population figures. Keep up the good work! Dakilang Isagani 03:52, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for posting all those resources! I've come across the Parañaque and Davao maps, but the former is dubious in terms of the exact border delineation and the latter is not to scale. Also, I've been really racking my brains out trying to remember the map site that had barangay borders - I'm very glad you shared the link! I'll try to have the congressional district map(s) ready by next week.
By the way, just a general rambling: Isn't it peculiar that Cotabato City still falls under the label of "1st District of Maguindanao"? I mean, San Jose del Monte and Antipolo both have their names on their district designations even though they are merely component cities of Bulacan and Rizal respectively. Why the COMELEC made an exception to an independent component city boggles me. -- Dakilang Isagani 02:29, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
The maps are almost finished, with just minor adjustments for Davao City and Metro Manila pending. I came across the COMELEC's Education and Information Department website that had this document. It divides Pasig and Pasay into two districts each. Are these among the newer congressional districts created since the last election? By the way, the document does not divide Taguig and Marikina into districts, although Parañaque and Valenzuela were. Dakilang Isagani 00:30, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ph_seal_negros_occidental_kabankalan_city.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:03, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Map of the legislative districts of the Philippines

Here's the coloured version of the legislative districts map that I've been working on. The provincial and relevant city boundaries are thicker than the intra-provincial/city district boundaries.

File:Legislative districts of the Philippines (coloured).png

What do you think? --- Dakilang Isagani 05:23, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure if the locator maps I made for individual districts would be up to the high standard set by Coffee for Philippine regions, provinces, cities and municipalities. I need your opinion/suggestions on how to improve them. Take a look at samples of my district locator maps:
CALOOCAN CITY

This one's fairly easy on the eyes, methinks. By the way, should I remove the text explaining the Philippines' territorial disputes over Scarborough Shoal, Kalayaan and Sabah?
ANTIPOLO CITY

I think this district is the smallest in terms of land area outside of Metro Manila. I can make individual province/city maps with municipal/barangay boundaries but that would take at least until the end of summer to entirely accomplish.
By the way, thank you very much for the barnstar! I really appreciate it. --- Dakilang Isagani 07:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Also, according to the COMELEC document I mentioned before, the two barangays of Post Proper Northside and Southside still belong to Makati's 2nd Congressional District, as R.A. 8487 did not mention these barangays as part of the new legislative district of Taguig yet (the RTC ruling was in 2003, the Republic Act was signed on February 1998). I took these into account on the maps I've made so far. --- Dakilang Isagani 07:34, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
It'd be awesome if you could find out for sure whether those two barangays are indeed part of the congressional district of Taguig City, before I multpily the mistakes. I think it would require another RA to amend the original Taguig cityhood charter to include the barangays in dispute to the district. In the meantime, those barangays are now administratively part of Taguig City. I would think that residents would now vote for city officials (executive branch of government) of Taguig but not congressional representatives (legislative branch) of Taguig yet. --- Dakilang Isagani 20:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Will do. ;-) Only that it might take a few more days, I hope that's OK. In the following weeks I might be able to only make the district locator maps for Metro Manila, with the others to be made in the summer. --- Dakilang Isagani 18:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
This is fantastic! Would it be possible to do a political map, showing which districts are controlled by what party, based on the 2007 election results? Gareon 15:43, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

I am currently making a map showing political party affiliations of representatives for the 13th Congress, but I'm encountering some minor problems/questions: (1) for those representatives that have more than one party affiliation - as indicated in the table - do I show both or just the primary party affiliation? (2) What party is Congressman Danilo Lagbas of Misamis Oriental a member of during the 13th Congress? He is marked as belonging to the KNP, which is the opposition coalition (not a party itself, but rather composed of several parties). I googled more information and apparently he ran as a Lakas-CMD candidate this year. (3) As for the proper colour scheme for representing the political parties, what is the predominant colour of the logos/livery of the following parties, or even just the main colour most associated with them?

  • PROMDI
  • Alayon
  • SARRCO
  • KAMPI
  • KBL (red?)
  • Lakas-CMD
  • PMP
  • PDP-Laban
  • Reporma-LM

By the way, it's great to hear you're making a map with municipal boundaries shown. I don't have sophisticated image software - believe it or not I only had MS Paint and Irfanview to help me make the maps I've made so far. Let me know how things go, as I'm excited to see the results! — Dakilang Isagani 08:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Cheche Lazaro

Thank you for letting me know - she sounds very notable then.

The article does need cleanup, so I will tag it as such. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Guroadrunner (talkcontribs) 17:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC).

Fair use images are banned in templates

I know it sucks, but just letting you know... --Howard the Duck 10:28, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

{{KOR}}

I noticed you changed the text of {{KOR}} from South Korea to Republic of Korea. Was there a consensus somewhere on this that I missed? I don't mind the change, but it seemed abrupt and I didn't notice anything on the talk page. Awartha 07:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Why are you going after me?

If you have problems with this template please use the discussion page.23prootie 08:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

About the Province by Province results of the each candidate in 1998 and 2004 Presidential election the the Philippines

If you have the copy of the province by province results of the last 2 Presidential elections in the Philippines in 1998 and 2004 elections, canyou please post the province by province results on my talk page then you post the province by province results of 1998 and 2004 Presidential elections to their respective articles in Wikipedia if available to you the province by province results of 1998 and 2004 Presidential elections in the Philippines. --Joseph Solis in Australia 08:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Can you please post the detailed data with the province by province vote of the last 2 presidential election in the Philippines in 1998 and 2004 to their respective articles in Wikipedia. Thank you. --Joseph Solis in Australia 07:05, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
You can give me the detailed results of 1946, 1949, 1953, 1957, 1961, 1965, 1981, 1986 and 1998 Presidential elections results with province by province breakdown on my e-mail address: josephs_dagreat@yahoo.com.--Joseph Solis in Australia 07:19, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
I have a question, Do you have a detailed results of Vice-Presidential elections with with province by province breakdown from 1946 to 2004 and if you have the detailed results of Vice-Presidential election, you can give me Vice-Presidential elections with with province by province breakdown on my my e-mail address: josephs_dagreat@yahoo.com.--Joseph Solis in Australia 09:26, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Commonwealth Congress

But there was a plebiscite in 1940 that abolished the National Assembly and replaced it with the 1st Congress of the Commonwealth of the Philippines which convened only in June 1945. That why it should be made 1st Congress of the Commonwealth of the Philippines or Commonwealth Congress in the Template:PhilippineLegislatures OKay. Plus your book had an error which was corrected by the Philippine National Historical Institute and i have the corrections. Ü — rizalninoynapoleon 17:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Batasang Bayan

I read from the Senate of the Philippines e-library that the Batasang Bayan was both an advisory and a legislative body patterned after the Philippine Commission. I know some people who served the Batasang Bayan and they said it was an transitional legislative body which functioned until the elections for the Interim Batasang Pambansa. So it has to be in Template:Philippine legislatures and refer to the book of Cesar Pobre "Philippine Legislature:100Years". Ü — rizalninoynapoleon 17:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)


Commonwealth Congress (Response)

Can u send through [rizalninoynapoleon@yahoo.com e-mail] the sessions, laws passed, major legislation, etc. Thanks.Rizalninoynapoleon 09:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)— rizalninoynapoleon' 05:19, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Philippine elections

I have obtain a cd containning summaries of elections (1946-Present) Including information about the Philippine general election, 2007 and the Philippine general election, 2010Rizalninoynapoleon 09:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)— rizalninoynapoleon' 09:20, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ph_seal_lanao_del_norte_iligan_city.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ph_seal_lanao_del_norte_iligan_city.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BigrTex 22:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Admin?

Sure, I've deleted all the old versions of those images. It's not a problem, if you really don't need them. By the way, are you interested at all in becoming an admin? You've been here for a year, plus 3 years anonymously, you have 6500 edits (including 400+ page moves), you use edit summaries properly, and you seem very hardworking and trustworthy... all things that would go over well with the people at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship. The only roadblock I see is that your edits in the Wikipedia namespace are very few.. they're exclusively to Wikipedia:Tambayan Philippines and its talk page. It's not something that would bother me, but the people voting there might see a low number and immediately think "inexperienced". TheCoffee 02:01, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Legislative Advisory Council

I am now have terminated some parts (copyright) of the article Legislative Executive Advisory Council of the Philippines due to copyright violations. This is the end of this issue. I am sorry for the trouble. User:rizalninoynapoleon 01:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

My edits accidentally put on the wrong page. User:rizalninoynapoleon 01:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Template:Philippine quasi-legislatures

You've listed {{Philippine quasi-legislatures}} for deletion, but have not given a reson for it. As of now, the consensus on the discussion page is to keep, most because there is no explanation. You might want to discuss your reasons here before a final decision is made. Thanks. - BillCJ 01:12, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Japan Philippines Locator.png. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Philippines Japan locator.png. The copy called Image:Philippines Japan locator.png has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 09:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Election quick counts

COMELEC ruling says that quick counts must be posted and updated on websites and will not be removed from the webpage so please tell Sir Howard that you can't remove the quick counts it even in the Amended Modernization Act of 2007.--rizalninoynapoleon 12:04, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Eddie Panlilio

COMELEC has just proclaimed that Fr. Eddie Panlilio (YEHEY! To end jueteng in Pampanga) as the new Governor of Pampanga. Howard, Scorpion and Others today is a day to end corruption and poverty and i ask that Among Ed should have a page he deserves it. Don't you second the motion rizalninoy 23:42, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Legislative districts

Hi,

Thanks for the reply :). I would like to get the dataset on who was serving where when, i.e. the congressmen for each district for each term. If it is not too much to ask you, can you send it through my mail? (bentong dot isles at gmail dot com) Thanks! --Bentong Isles 13:09, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I will just copy them from here :). Thanks! --Bentong Isles 14:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Batasang Bayan

I found the Presidential Decree No. 995 which has contains its functions and shows that it is an legislative body though provisional it might help as a reference and i have consulted the IPRS of the Batasan and said that the said legislature was as legislative body like the Batasang Pambansa. Pls. send message ASAP Rizalninoynapoleon 17:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC) Rizalninoynapoleon

Correction...that very source you mentions says (Emphases provided):
Section 1. Creation. There is hereby created a Legislative Advisory Council 
which shall hereinafter be known as the Batasan Bayan. 
Section 4. Functions. The Batasan Bayan shall function as an advisory body 
to the President on legislative matters.... 
It clearly says "Advisory". Are you sure you're reading your sources correctly? Strike two. --- Tito Pao 04:55, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Finance

It was great to have met you at the meetup. You mentioned you wanted to learn Finance . There is a masters in Finance Engineering at La Salle which I am considering very much. If you're from Don Bosco you must have taken up ECE? I took up ECE in La Salle. Cheers.--Jondel 05:41, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Can u help me in making wikitables. for the clans in the book rulemakers Rizalninoynapoleon 07:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

It will just be an unending list, it doesn't end with that in the book, perhaps just mention a few political families in the Philippine politics page, make a subsection about dynasties, not everyone is note-worthy. --Scorpion prinz (Talk | contribs) 07:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

...he just went ahead and did it anyway...albeit, with a gramatically clumsy title. --- Tito Pao 07:52, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

We can do that, but knowing him by now, hindi titigil yan hangga't hindi nya nakukuha ang gusto nya (remember how he insisted that the email was real, only to "recant" his story?). We might need to do something else... --- Tito Pao 17:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
On second thought, your proposal seems to be more tenable. Let's study our options carefully so that it will pass on the first nomination. Try sending me an email and let's talk about it...my GMail addy is the same as my WP name (that is, "Titopao"). I'll try to respond ASAP. --- Tito Pao 22:11, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

This guy must be stopped...it's obvious that he committed a copyvio on this article, but I don't have enough evidence except that the contents look like it was lifted from a campaign website or flyer. --- Tito Pao 07:45, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Seal of Bauang La Union.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Seal of Bauang La Union.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:26, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ph seal zamboanga city.png

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ph seal zamboanga city.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ph seal aklan malay.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ph seal aklan malay.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Larger maps

The maps are from the base map used in Google Maps. I carefully screen captured, cropped and pieced everything together using MS Paint. As for the provincial borders: I used one particular zoom size in Google Maps that had the exact same size as the blank Philippine map offered by TheCoffee at Tambayan so as to be able to easily copy and paste the provincial borders. The municipal borders are also from locator maps by TheCoffee, except for Bohol and Rizal/Antipolo: it seems that there are some yet-to-be-settled municipal boundary disputes/uncertainties within both provinces; TheCoffee follows NAMRIA's borders while I followed the borders shown on maps in Bohol's and Antipolo's official websites.

Just a bit of warning: although the Google Maps base map looks more detailed, there are minor inaccuracies and inconsistencies with it, especially regarding smaller islands, inland waters and newer reclaimed land. Sometimes lakes/water features appear where there only are rice paddies (see the north/northeastern rim of Manila Bay) or do not appear at all where they should (there's no lake in Volcano Island on Taal Lake). Several islands in the Spratly and Turtle groups that are never covered by water even in high tide are not even shown, while the outline of the features in the Scarborough group makes them look bigger (i.e. with more land) than they are in actuality. Overall it is somewhat impressive for its detail, which may look great in medium-sized thumbnails but are painful to colour-by-click using just MS Paint! --- Dakilang Isagani 06:45, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Oh cool, you screen captured from Google Maps too! Haha... *high five* :D TheCoffee 18:00, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
(I meant that for Dakilang Isagani, by the way.. hehe.. TheCoffee 18:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC))

rizalninoynapoleon

I am thinking temporary log off for one month after what i did so please free of any leaving comments Rizalninoynapoleon 09:05, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Where did u get a copy of Assembly of the Nation

Where did u get an copy since the first copies were only for house officials and dignitaries but my copy i had purchased from the publisher Rizalninoynapoleon 06:39, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ph seal cavite general mariano alvarez.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ph seal cavite general mariano alvarez.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

user page

Sorry about messing up your user page!!! When there are too many websites open in this (old) windows 95 , the browser tabs here get mixed up. Sorry. Let me put my message below. By the way, I'd like to help out with the spanish translation. I'll try to contact you this week end.--Jondel 12:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Hello po kuya...heheh...I'm currently a High School student in DBTC and I am proud to say, that you were too...Ü. Anyways, napadaan lang po ako para pumuri...heheh. I was very much impressed with your imagery works. Lalo na po yung Campus map ng DBTC eh...hehe...Keep up the good work! Ü

Thanks!--Bozconian14 08:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ph seal kalinga tabuk.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ph seal kalinga tabuk.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Cabinet Members of the Interim Batasan

I am back sorry i haven't talk to you guys for a long time. Anyway, I have just completed the names of the Cabinet Members of the IBP since my i was able to verify the names on metal marker found at the library and archives of the House of Representatives. I also took a picture of people appointed to sectoral representatives of the Regular Batasan but i don't have the regions of their sectoral representations. please help. Rizalninoynapoleon 13:09, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Creating a template for the consultative legislatures of the Philippines

Since the publishing of the book of Assembly of the Nation, many advisory or consultative legislatures have been recently surfaced. According to the book the following advisory legislative bodies:

  • Biyak-na-Bato Assembly of the Filipino Nation
  • Asamblea Consultiva de Filipinas
  • Batasang Bayan

should be put in the template. Since the LEDAC was formed only to formulate laws and it is not considered a consultative legislature plus it was under the Office of the President. Please give reaction. Rizalninoynapoleon 16:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Congress Template

Is it okay if I could put an asterisk on the 1st Commonwealth Congress concerning the terms which started in 1941 but the congress convened only 1945. Rizalninoynapoleon 14:42, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Concerning Party-List Election

Scorpion, since 13 of the party-list organizations were proclaimed by the COMELEC

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DBTC Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:DBTC Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

14th Congress of the Philippines

Howard the Duck keeps reiterating that the Senate Section should have the section Majority bloc? Besides, other congress from the 8th to the 13th Congress did not say who was in the majority or the minority Reply ASAP Rizalninoynapoleon 06:40, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Voting for the Tambayan Philippines Collaboration #1 is ongoing

Hi! The voting for the article to be the first target of Tambayan Philippines Collaboration Department is ongoing. Please vote even if it is abstain. Thanks! --seav 14:14, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cagayan de Oro City seal.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Cagayan de Oro City seal.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 13:55, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

What Filipino words can you contribute? --Filipinayzd (talk) 14:49, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:ARMM colored.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:ARMM colored.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:14, 24 December 2007 (UTC)