User talk:Nohaata

This is Nohaata's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hatsa Vii (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pythoncoder were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hatsa Vii and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hatsa Vii, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 13:23, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nohaata! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 13:23, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hatsa Vii (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No references at all - requires significant coverage in independent reliable sources to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hatsa Vii and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hatsa Vii, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 23:25, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Hatsa Vii concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hatsa Vii, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mikozi Network

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mikozi Network, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 18:05, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hatsa Vii

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hatsa Vii, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 18:05, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hatsa Vii for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hatsa Vii is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hatsa Vii until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 20:05, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nohaata. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 21:08, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nohaata (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear admin Am here by to address my self and apologize for abusive and miss use of my account am really sorry for what happen i hired someone to write 3 articles here on Wikipedia and trusted him with my account and he have been holding me for a month now and today i decided to login my account and check i find this notice on my wall that i have been blocked am really sorry i paid him $600 for 3 articles hatsa vii and mikozi Network he promised to deliver in 2 weeks but it has been months now but am sorry for ever made my account blocked. Thank you hoping to hear from one of your admin. Nohaata (talk) 23:33, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This was totally inappropriate for you to do this. It also runs against WP:COMPROMISED, meaning we can probably never lift the block on this account. Additionally, none of this addresses why you set up two other accounts to spam Wikipedia. Yamla (talk) 23:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you for fast reply like i said i hired someone write articles for why should i i open another account if i already had one amd if possible van you please show me the other account your mentioning i have been on Wikipedia for 2 years now ghis was my first time i trusted someone with my account. Nohaata (talk) 23:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And its oky we can deleted this one so how can i get back on Wikipedia do i have to create another account? Or is there any way i need to follow? Nohaata (talk) 23:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nohaata (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here Nohaata (talk) 23:48, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I cannot unblock you at this time as this is for sock puppetry. Please read the pertinent section of the WP:GAB. And, please, do not hire anyone else to edit Wikipedia. -- Deep fried okra 00:28, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you for fast reply like i said i hired someone write articles for why should i i open another account if i already had one amd if possible van you please show me the other account your mentioning i have been on Wikipedia for 2 years now ghis was my first time i trusted someone with my account. Nohaata

And its oky we can deleted this one so how can i get back on Wikipedia do i have to create another account? Or is there any way i need to follow?

If you hired someone to edit

then that's still a form of sock puppetry. It is also not going to endear you to anyone here. You don't get back on Wikipedia unless you address the reasons for your block. You do not create another account. That is block evasion and still sock puppetry.-- Deep fried okra 00:16, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello i understand can you help me and show me steps on how i can fix this please? Nohaata (talk) 22:08, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nohaata (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here Nohaata (talk) 23:31, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Your reason here" is not a good reason to unblock you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:33, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello i understand can you help me and show me steps on how i can fix this please?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nohaata (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, I didn’t know I shouldn’t have done that. I won’t do it again Forgive me please Nohaata (talk) 08:48, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have already indicated that this account is compromised, which means it cannot be unblocked for security reasons. Even leaving that aside, you have not adequately addressed the reason for the block. It also seems that you lack the skills and abilities need to contribute here and understand us. These things mean that there are not grounds to lift the block, and I must decline your request. As your requests have not made progress towards getting unblocked, I have decided to remove your access to this page to prevent more time wasting by everyone(including you). You can use WP:UTRS to make further appeals, but they will need to improve significantly. 331dot (talk) 09:37, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nohaata. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ST47 (talk) 00:49, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

{unblock|Dear admin's am hereby apologizing and admitting my mistake I was been blocked for creating multiple accounts which I didn't know it will affect me like this now the problem is becoming big even to my workmate at my office and other people around me every time someone uses our office wi-fi to edit Wikipedia they get blocked and put the blame on me which I understand and I have been getting calls and emails from other people because of the same problem I would like to apologize and forget and if there any way I can do to get out of this please tell looking forward for your help thank you Nohaata (talk) 16:55, 19 April 2020 (UTC)}[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nohaata (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear admin's am hereby apologizing and admitting my mistake I was been blocked for creating multiple accounts which I didn't know it will affect me like this now the problem is becoming big even to my workmate at my office and other people around me every time someone uses our office wi-fi to edit Wikipedia they get blocked and put the blame on me which I understand and I have been getting calls and emails from other people because of the same problem I would like to apologize and forget and if there any way I can do to get out of this please tell looking forward for your help thank you here are the only articles related to me Nohaata Seven Hatsa Vii and Mikozi Network but the other articles doesn't below to me and I have nothing to do with them Nohaata (talk) 17:00, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. You are asking for an unblock, but you've been so abusive that you are now considered banned; see WP:CBAN and WP:3X. You'll need to make an unban request. WP:UNBAN explains how to do so. Given that you were caught literally today evading your block, there's no chance this will be granted now. Go at least six months with zero edits, then apply to the community to have your ban lifted. And you are correct, your workmate and other people in your office should indeed place the blame on you because you are the person at fault here. Yamla (talk) 18:12, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.