This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Reply to the Unblock Request
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
To the best of my knowledge and according to the explanations asked to me required by you to unblock my account are as described below: As far as copyright violations are concerned, I uploaded certain files which were from certain sources by different authors about whom the description was given under the head "Source" for the Files Uploaded. But Due to reasons unknown to me, certain files were termed with "Copyright Problems" whereas certain as in the case File:Urvashi Dholakia.jpj and others were retained. As far as multiple accounts are concerned, the second account immediately after the block of this account was created to contribute to Wikipedia. In case, where other accounts are concerned, They were created after several request for the Unblock for this account were made. Also a delay of two years for making a request to Unblock this account was password problem i.e., I forgot the Password for This account and also my email address was not registered, due to which I was unable to get the new password which also resulted into creation of other accounts. I would ensure that all such accounts are deleted, and also the edits made using the other accounts does not have have any issues relating to Edits except the Sockpuppet problem. I would urge the administrator to review my block and approve this request. I hope for the unblock as soon as possible so as me to contribute some useful edits to Wikipedia. I would also urge to consider this request by having a little faith in me and not declining the request. This is a sincere and honest request which I hope would now not be declined.
Decline reason:
Before we go any further, I want you to provide a complete list of alternative accounts that you have created. Also, I think you should read Wikipedia:Copyright and Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria as it seems you do not understand why certain images you uploaded were deleted. PhilKnight (talk) 05:31, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
The copyright problems extend to articles as well. MER-C 05:08, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Reply to the Unblock Request
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
As me being unaware of the Sockpuppet and the process to Unblock the account, I created another accounts to edit Wikipedia. I hope you believe in me, as I am very honest at every point asked by you. I hope you to consider this request by having a little faith in me and not declining the request. This is a sincere and honest request which I hope would now not be declined.
As far as Wikipedia:Copyright and Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria is considered, I have read all the guidelines and conditions for the same in this period of time and also I have read all the guidelines and conditions to create or edit an article on Wikipedia.
I am sure that you would believe in me as all the things said above by me are true and honest to you to consider to unblock my account and as far as all the above accounts are concerned, I would remove immediately all of the above as soon as my account is unblocked.
Accept reason:
After conferring with the blocking administrator, we have agreed that you have educated yourself regarding content and behavior, and we believe that you would become a net benefit for the Wikipedia project if you are unblocked. Congratulations, you are unblocked, subject to the restrictions outlined by Dangerous Panda below
There is no need to do anything with the other accounts you created, they are already blocked and will remain so, and accounts can't be deleted anyway. Be warned that if you engage in Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry again, you will be re-blocked and the community's goodwill toward you will likely be impossible to recover to be unblocked again.
Please go about getting a mentor. Also, feel free to drop a note to me on my talk page (or to anyone else who has responded to you) if you are unsure about something. Good luck, and happy editing. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:19, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello Noormohammed. Thanks for taking the time to disclose your additional accounts, and to express your intention to abide by Wikipedia's policies in the future. However, as there is still some doubt as to whether you actually understand these policies, could you please answer User:Anthony Bradbury's request above and explain, in your own words, your understanding of Wikipedia:Copyright and Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria? Specifically, could you briefly describe when it is permitted to contribute text and images which you did not create yourself, and what the basic rules are for using and attributing such material here? —Psychonaut (talk) 18:49, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello Psychonaut. Thanks for hearing the plea and having a little faith on me. As far as Wikipedia:Copyright and Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria are concerned, Copyright relates to the work of others that has been created by them which may be text(articles) or media files. As far as there usage in Wikipedia are concerned, they are not allowed to be used or uploaded in Wikipedia as they are the works of others and infringe the copyright of others. As far as there use is concerned, if by Special Permissions or by the copyright holder himself/herself are uploaded. As for Non-free content criteria, they are used for an article to describe it where no free equivalent is available. I hope the explanations given by me are up to the information required by you. Also, I would request you to unblock my account as soon as possible.
I hope there is someone to reply to the plea and help me out to unblock my account.
I'm a believer in second chances, but I would only do so with some minor restrictions in this case because I'm still not sure that you truly understand copyright. Restriction 1: obviously, you would be limited to a single account on Wikipedia for an indefinite period of time. You would not even be permitted to edit anonymously. Restriction 2: you would need to be adopted. This would include 2 primary elements: successfully follow their adoption program (focused on copyright), followed by at least a 6 month period where your proposed edits would all need to be verified by your mentor. At the end of the adoption period, restriction 2 could be removed at the advice of the mentor. Obviously, any violation of these conditions would undermine the sincerity and faith, and would thus lead to a reblock without warning the panda ₯’ 09:38, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ye Hai Mohabbatein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Some of the reasons why your edit was reverted
I reverted your edits because your version failed many basic Wikipedia content requirements.
Within the lead, you make the false claim that it has aired every night - during holidays and when pre-empted for special events, it has not. You replaced Monday and Friday with abbreviations, but did not even include the periods.
In addition, Wikipedia is not an advertisement nor a tv guide where we promote the time of the show's broadcast. ( Within the body of the article it might be appropriate to discuss the specific timeslot if it is in the context of a third party discussing how and why the specific timeslot matters.)
You added an "overview " section which is simply your personal commentary and is completely unnecessary when there is a plot summary section.
In the cast section you inserted multiple nicknames for characters, we only provide the credited name.
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Ye Hai Mohabbatein. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:24, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Ajeeb Daastaan Hai Ye
Your addition to Ajeeb Daastaan Hai Ye has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You appear to have copied the plot summary from a BollywoodLife.com article.Psychonaut (talk) 12:01, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
You really need to be careful about this. You were unblocked with the understanding that such incidents would not resume, but they have, and you will likely be blocked again if it happens again. You also need to find a mentor, which was a condition for your unblock. I am not on Wikipedia on a regular basis, so I cannot do it. Please see Wikipedia:Mentorship for further guidance. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:18, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Noormohammed, I see you've been continuing to edit here even after it was pointed out to you several times that you first need to find a mentor and edit only under their tutelage [1][2]. Please do this before making any further edits to articles. You can read about mentorship at Wikipedia:Mentorship and see a list of available mentors at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area/Adopters. You will note that there are at least a couple of available mentors who specialize in copyright concerns. —Psychonaut (talk) 08:59, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Pavitra Bandhan
Your addition to Pavitra Bandhan has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. Where did you get the text for the plot summary? It appears on dozens of web pages which predate your own Wikipedia article by many months or years. If there is a freely licensed source for it, you must mention this on the article's talk page. Psychonaut (talk) 08:39, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Longest-running Indian TV Shows
I unblocked you on the condition that you obtain a mentor. You have not done so. Instead, it appears that you have resumed the behavior that got you blocked in the first place. Please document your attempts to secure a mentor. If you cannot do so, then do not engage in any activity on Wikipedia except for seeking a mentor. Any activity not related to getting a mentor will result in re-blocking of this account. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:08, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for sharing your views I have applied to certain users to be my mentor but they say as I Edit pages on Indian television, Indian soap opera, Indian televisionActors, Indian Awards shows & Production houses, they could not assist/mentor me for these. Also, I have applied to major Mentors for the same and awaiting their reply soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noormohammed satya (talk • contribs) 03:59, 30 November 2014
@DangerousPanda and Amatulic: What's the deal here? Is this editor allowed to edit or not? I have concerns. – Brianhe (talk) 04:49, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi there and thanks for your contributions. I just wanted to remind you about WP:STRONGNAT. Articles clearly related to India should use Indian English spelling, such as favourite (not favorite), organisation (not organization), colour (not color), centre (not center) etc. I am particularly referencing Star Parivaar Awards. You created a large number of templates using "favorite" instead of favourite despite the proper name of each award actually being Favourite according to their website. Thanks! AusLondonder (talk) 18:34, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Global Indian Film and TV Honours until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:45, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Another Indian TV trophy looting ceremony with no claims of notability from any secondary or tertiary references. All references are self-published primary sources. Fails WP:GNG. Also created by someone who has a long history of socking for TV & film related promotional articles.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Category:Gold Awards, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
New deal for page patrollers
Hi Noormohammed satya,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, when you recreated Naagin (season 2), what established community process were you following? There's virtually nothing there that would warrant a standalone article. At best, a "List of episodes" would be warranted if anyone had the foresight to create a list of episodes for S1 as well, but a standalone article for S2 is grossly premature. Note that there isn't even a standalone article for Naagin (season 1) yet. If you plan to edit television articles, you really should become familiar with how the rest of the WikiProject Television community does things. Otherwise you're going to waste your time creating fluffy articles that don't adhere to basic community guidelines. The normal pattern goes:
Main article - This would be Naagin (TV series). This is a general overview of the entire series that should be growing until we reach a point where it makes sense to split off into new articles.
List of episodes - Only when there is sufficient content do we create a standalone for episodes. This typically happens after we create a full episode list for S1, and then begin a new one for S2. See MOS:TV Note Firefly (TV series), which ran for one season. This is a Featured Article. How many articles are related to Firefly? Just one, the main one. There's no standalone article for the episodes, or for characters, or for Season 1. All the show's details are delivered in one beefy article.
Individual season articles - Only when we have sufficient content about casting, production, ratings, critical response, etc. for each season would we even consider creating standalone articles for each season. See SpongeBob SquarePants (season 1)
Naagin (season 2) has seriously jumped the gun and it should be redirected. The episode list may be retained, but until someone creates an episode list for S1, I have no idea where it should go. Maybe in your sandbox? Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:19, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Zee Rishtey Awards and other self-aggrandizing awards
Hi there, re: these changes at Kumkum Bhagya, please avoid adding self-congratulatory awards issued by the network the series airs on. Awards that someone gives themselves are not genuine awards. We typically only care about major awards issued by independent, noteworthy entities. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:26, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Noormohammed satya. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello Noormohammed satya: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 16:55, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Naagin Season 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation
Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did with the plot section in the article Bewafaa sii Wafaa. Such material is copyright and you should instead write the information in your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:41, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Ye Hai Mohabbatein. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:24, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Your addition to Ajeeb Daastaan Hai Ye has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You appear to have copied the plot summary from a BollywoodLife.com article. Psychonaut (talk) 12:01, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Template:Longest-running Indian TV Shows has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Psychonaut (talk) 10:46, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 15:13, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
