User talk:Okpeletier

Welcome!

Hello, Okpeletier, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft of your article in draftspace or in your userspace first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 15:52, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tea Queens Season 3

Hello, Okpeletier,

Thanks for creating Tea Queens Season 3! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 16:00, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of Tea Queens (U.S. TV series) episodes moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Tea Queens (U.S. TV series) episodes, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 17:41, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tea Queens (season 1)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Tea Queens (season 1), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 20:55, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Walking Dead (season 10) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Walking Dead (season 10), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 21:38, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CoolSkittle (talk) 01:05, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tea Queens Season 5

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Tea Queens Season 5, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 02:04, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Okpeletier

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Okpeletier, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jacenty359 (talk) 11:48, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Okpeletier

A tag has been placed on User:Okpeletier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 11:55, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from User:Okpeletier, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Jacenty359 (talk) 12:07, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Okpeletier

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that User:Okpeletier, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CoolSkittle (talk) 21:24, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at User:Okpeletier, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 21:31, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your article creations. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Okpeletier (talk) creating hoaxes. CoolSkittle (talk) 21:39, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

school project?

Given the fake articles you are creating, seems doubtful. Please respond at the ANI thread above before editing further. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia project, and the things you've been doing are not compatible. Please read the welcome that follows. If you really are a student, please follow the tutorial at Student Training Modules. Before continuing.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:09, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also, please direct your instructor to Wikipedia:Education program/Educators for more information on how to best use Wikipedia as an educational adjunct.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:19, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing to create inappropriate pages and not responding to concerns raised on your talk page and at ANI. To be unblocked, please respond to our concerns here and affirm that you will edit no further until after the matter at ANI is resolved..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:24, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Okpeletier (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not believe I engaged in disruptive editing, so I believe the given grounds of this block are false. I did, however, accidentally use Wikipedia as a web host, which I now realise is not the case. I have made numerous contributions before the block, all of which were not seen as disruptive, I just mis-interpreted Wikipedia as a web host and was unfortunately not familiar with the talk page and therefore did not see multiple warnings. This is why i feel I should be unblocked. Okpeletier (talk) 19:25, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Under the circumstances, you should follow the standard offer and reapply for an unblock in 6 months time. PhilKnight (talk) 19:34, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block evasion

This user has engaged in widespread block evasion and sockpuppetry including as recently as June, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 15:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]