User talk:OttRider

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Stay for Awhile[edit]

I moved the article back to "Stay for Awhile" because that is the name of the song. "Awhile" is the correct term. http://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-while-vs-awhile/ Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Oops[edit]

Apologies, you are correct. I found what I thought was a definitive reference for the other (correct) spelling, but turns out that was a different version, not the referenced song. OttRider (talk) 22:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Awhile vs A While[edit]

Having received a few comments about this edit:

  • "Awhile" is an adverb. It is used with a verb, without a preposition such as "for". So you can write "I will stay awhile".
  • "A while" is a noun phrase, taking a preposition. So you can write "I will stay for a while".

Writing "I will stay for awhile" is incorrect. Since "awhile" has the meaning "for a while", that would be equivalent to writing "I will stay for for a while".

See here for a more fulsome discussion. OttRider (talk) 22:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

You keep making changes and in several cases did it against correct usage. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:41, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Response[edit]

Sorry, sir. With respect, you are incorrect. In one of your reverts you give as a reason "awhile is an English word". This is true - "awhile" is an English word. But it is the wrong word following the word "for".

  • Awhile can be used alone, as in "I will wait awhile".
  • "A while" may be used with the preposition "for", as in "I will wait for a while".
  • Awhile, used with "for", as in "I will wait for awhile", is always incorrect.

References:

OttRider (talk) 22:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, OttRider! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! MrBill3 (talk) 07:49, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Andrew A. Skolnick may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[:Category:Writers from Chicago, Illinois]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:11, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Adam Rutherford at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 09:32, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Leila Schneps[edit]

I created a Wikidata entry for Leila Schneps - you can find a link to it under the "tools" menu on her Wikipedia article. You might like to take a look and see whether anything needs to be added. It's always a good idea to make a matching Wikidata entry, when you make a new article here. Good work on that article, BTW! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:05, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thank you for the several constructive edits and for the advice. First new page, much to learn.

DYK for Adam Rutherford[edit]

Materialscientist (talk) 10:13, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Leila Schneps[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:08, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Nice article. perhaps should have moved your sand box User:OttRider/sandbox-cc, rather than cut paste;

hope you continue, with more Women scientists, many red links [User:Keilana/Female scientist list]][. Duckduckstop (talk) 15:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Faye Flam[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Faye Flam at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Antidiskriminator (talk) 18:34, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

WebCite archive[edit]

Hi,

I just wanted to pay your attention to WebCite archive which allows you to archive current version of web pages. It might be useful when you cite some web page which is subject of frequent changes. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 09:06, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Faye Flam[edit]

Gatoclass (talk) 03:47, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Faye Flam[edit]

Hello, OttRider,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Faye Flam should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faye Flam .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Fiachra10003 (talk) 02:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, OttRider. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, OttRider. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)