User talk:PDAF14YT

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, PDAF14YT! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 12:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Call of Duty: Black Ops 4, you may be blocked from editing. -- ferret (talk) 21:38, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare. -- ferret (talk) 21:39, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of GAWNE for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GAWNE is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GAWNE until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Blue Riband► 02:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notability for musicians

Hello PDAF14YT, I am the editor who nominated your article GAWNE for deletion. You are new to Wikipedia and it can be disappointing but there are two issues that would need to be addressed:

It lacked any sourcing. Verifiability is essential on Wikipedia, and independent sourcing must back up the claims about the artist. This is critically important for Biographies of living persons. You may want to take a look at WP:REFBEGIN for ideas on where to start.
In my reading of it his notability was all based on social media and streaming counts. Wikipedia has a very high bar for a musician to have his/her own article and the critiera are laid out at WP:MUSICBIO. Social media followers, users, likes, streams or whatever does not qualify. Why somebody is notable - according to that critera - should be mentioned within the first 2-3 sentances.

If the article is still a work in progress it should be left as a draft. Should it get deleted the administrator can "userfy" it for you to your draft space so you can do more work on it.Blue Riband► 03:45, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GAWNE

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on GAWNE, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE💕 12:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rhea Ripley, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Mann Mann (talk) 06:53, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Citizen Kane, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You're adding RT and MC reception information to film articles that already have them. Please be more careful and review the articles before adding duplicate info. DonIago (talk) 19:28, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Technoblade, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aoidh (talk) 01:40, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to The Avengers (2012 film), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not ignore explanations and edit war, you were told why that information was not there and choosing to add it again is just disruptive. adamstom97 (talk) 10:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, I'm Silikonz-alt. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Strange World (film) seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Silikonz (alt)💬 16:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello, I'm GoneIn60. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Avatar: The Way of Water, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. You are also welcome to join the discussion at Talk:Avatar: The Way of Water#Critical reception statement in the lead. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 05:56, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm TheManInTheBlackHat. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to The Last of Us (TV series) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 13:13, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to The Last of Us (TV series). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Per this edit you Mike Allen 20:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Avatar: The Way of Water several times in edits like this one and this one, you may be blocked from editing. It is way past time you discuss the changes you are trying to make. GoneIn60 (talk) 00:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Super Bowl LVII halftime show, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sricsi (talk) 16:10, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:05, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at John Wick: Chapter 4. Mike Allen 14:21, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Backlash (2023)

You recently added a summary of the event's reception to the lead, but it was not sourced. This information (actually all) has to be sourced to a reliable source. We can't just go off hearsay. JDC808 ♫ 02:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 11:32, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent addition of unsourced content, refusal to discuss.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 15:55, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]