User talk:Paloappie
Image copyright problem with Image:Junior_Campus.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Junior_Campus.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:21, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:LOGO.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:LOGO.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Junior Campus.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Junior Campus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 10:59, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Senior campus.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Senior campus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 11:36, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Nomination of Greg Dickens for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Dickens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 07:49, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Spacetime
[edit]Your edit to the Spacetime article [1] created a number of bugs in maths rendering with big red error messages. This was due to changes in the {{tmath}} tag this wraps the <math> tag which needs LaTeX syntax here minus is represent by a hyphen - rather than the − symbol. Other markup like can't be used either. --Salix alba (talk): 18:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
DYK for John William Kiser
[edit]On 28 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John William Kiser, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John William Kiser (pictured), who arrived in Chicago "practically penniless", took advantage of a boom in bicycle usage when he formed the Monarch Bicycle company? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John William Kiser. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, John William Kiser), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Redfern Now, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Richard Green, Robert MacKenzie and Christian Petersen. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
The article Adrian Russell Wills has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Currently, has zero reliable independent sources. Can't find enough to show they pass WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 11:28, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Onel5969 I have added some more references, please review and see if it now passes or needs more work. Paloappie (talk) 09:44, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- It is still not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable secondary sources. Most of the sources are related to the person (Yellow Creative, Rusted Dogs), or unreliable (imdb), or interviews (creatensw, if, and screenaustralia). While those last 3 can be used to cite certain things (see WP:PRIMARY), they do not go towards notability. If those 3 had simply been about them, rather than an interview with them, then you'd be okay. Hope you understand the difference. If you want, I can move the article into draft and let you work on it, and can review it as you develop it. Just let me know. Onel5969 TT me 11:19, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Onel5969 Thanks, I understand. I think it's a hard one because he's notable in a particularly underrepresented community (Indigenous Australians) and it's just hard to source due to cultural constraints and publishing sensitivities/media bias that often exist around Indigenous Australians. I've added a few more sources, but happy for you to move back to draft if that's more appropriate. Paloappie (talk) 02:46, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, it's better, but still has issues. Not only with notability. I've moved it to draft, and you can work on it there. He's definitely notabilty. I'll leave any further comments on the draft's talk page, and help you through developing it. Onel5969 TT me 11:15, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Onel5969 Thanks, I understand. I think it's a hard one because he's notable in a particularly underrepresented community (Indigenous Australians) and it's just hard to source due to cultural constraints and publishing sensitivities/media bias that often exist around Indigenous Australians. I've added a few more sources, but happy for you to move back to draft if that's more appropriate. Paloappie (talk) 02:46, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- It is still not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable secondary sources. Most of the sources are related to the person (Yellow Creative, Rusted Dogs), or unreliable (imdb), or interviews (creatensw, if, and screenaustralia). While those last 3 can be used to cite certain things (see WP:PRIMARY), they do not go towards notability. If those 3 had simply been about them, rather than an interview with them, then you'd be okay. Hope you understand the difference. If you want, I can move the article into draft and let you work on it, and can review it as you develop it. Just let me know. Onel5969 TT me 11:19, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Adrian Russell Wills
[edit]Hello, Paloappie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Adrian Russell Wills, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Adrian Russell Wills
[edit]Hello, Paloappie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Adrian Russell Wills".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:30, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
May 2023
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at Door prize, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. In addition, please see WP:SEAOFBLUE. Drmies (talk) 14:52, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
[edit]Hello Paloappie! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 17:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)