User talk:Parveenali

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roger Watson (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roger Watson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:33, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Parveenali, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:33, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Roger Watson has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Roger Watson. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 23:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roger Watson (academic) has been accepted

Roger Watson (academic), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 23:40, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Roger Watson (academic)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Roger Watson (academic), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 18:37, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

February 2019

Hello, I'm Pórokhov. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Roger Watson (academic)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. —Pórokhov ^Порох 18:21, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Mistakes inserted by VisualEditor

Hello, I reverted your edit to Roger Watson since there seemed to be some markup mistakes inserted by VisualEditor (the Wikipedia editor). You can have a look at your previous edits in the edit history and see what can be reused. Might also be good to mention why one is delinking in the edit summary. Thanks :) – Þjarkur (talk) 00:54, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Parveenali. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Roger Watson (academic), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. It is clear you have some sort tit-for-tat agreement with User:Rwatson1955 to edit each other's articles in some superficial attempt to dodge WP:COI. This is not acceptable. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:55, 22 July 2019 (UTC)