User talk:Pepstar

Welcome!

Hello, Pepstar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question. Again, welcome!
Runcorn 21:47, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Giuseppe D.

The article Giuseppe D. has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. My76 Strat 02:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from articles without addressing the issue. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. My76 Strat 04:09, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Giuseppe D. for deletion

The article Giuseppe D. is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giuseppe D. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. My76 Strat 04:15, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:GDprofilepic.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:GDprofilepic.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MorganKevinJ^(talk) 04:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:GDprofilepic.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:GDprofilepic.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 04:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Offer to assist

Hello Pepstar, when you indicated that some of the terms flying about were as effective as a foreign language in helping you understand, I wanted to extend an offer of assistance. Most often when you see the blue link within the text, you can click that link to also get more information. For example, when I suggested that the article should be userfied, I included it as a blue link in case you needed more information, or if the term was unfamiliar. Perhaps look at some of the blue links that are in the text, as these are things that someone feels might help you in what ever circumstance you are dealing with. I am willing to walk with you through the process of writing your first article, and helping you understand the relevant Wikipedia policy which governs whether or not the writing qualifies as a Wikipedia article. Good luck to you. My76 Strat 03:02, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please. From the top of my article, walk me through until you see a red flag so I can understand what is wrong at that point and what I can do to rectify it. I also am trying to request the pic to be undeleted or should I repost with the copyright tag done correctly. Pepstar (talk) 03:42, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the article to User:Pepstar/Giuseppe D. - I see that My76Strat has offered to help, which I am glad to see. Be warned, however, that the move to your user space is only a temporary measure to give you time to "fix up" the article. If I see a 4-week period where no work is done on the draft article, I will delete it with no further warning. Having said that, I hope that you can bring it up to the standards of Wikipedia, as I don't like to see people's work deleted if it can be avoided. Regards, PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 04:15, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me what's the first thing I should fix on my page. Thank you. Pepstar (talk) 05:29, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Giuseppe Di Caccamo Jr. has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Giuseppe Di Caccamo Jr.. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:17, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giuseppe Di Caccamo Jr. (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giuseppe D. (2nd nomination). In order to show that this draft better establishes notability than the deleted article did, please either obtain a copy of the deleted article for comparison at Requests for Undeletion, or request Deletion Review.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Giuseppe Di Caccamo Jr. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Giuseppe Di Caccamo Jr., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:20, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pepstar! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:20, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Giuseppe Di Caccamo Jr.

Hello, Pepstar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Giuseppe Di Caccamo Jr.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 00:40, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]