User talk:Pri D

Welcome!

Hello, Pri D, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jeet Gian (author), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 13:44, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeet Gian (author)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jeet Gian (author) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 13:44, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Jeet Gian (author) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Jeet Gian (author) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://ihafeatures.blogspot.in/2016/09/farah-khan-sajid-khan-and-david-dhawan.html, http://writerightentertainment.blogspot.in/2016/09/farah-khan-sajid-khan-and-david-dhawan.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:45, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Jeet Gian (author)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Jeet Gian (author). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Jeet Gian. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Jeet Gian – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:28, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeet Gian for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeet Gian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeet Gian until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 21:27, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Jeet Gian have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to Jeet Gian was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://ihafeatures.blogspot.in/2016/09/farah-khan-sajid-khan-and-david-dhawan.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:59, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Inline cleanup tags

Hello there, I notice you removed all/some Inline cleanup tags from Jeet Gian an article you created. Please note unreliable, self-published and user-generated sources are not acceptable to support notability so I want to request you please do not remove such tags unless you removed the complete reference or cite a reliable source instead. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 12:02, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GSS-1987

I Understand you, and have removed the references as well as your tags which were self-published. However, You seem to have tagged a lot many references as unreliable and it was quite confusing. Please find below my concerns and let me know your thoughts. I will be happy to discuss.

Thanks Regards Pri D (talk) 10:35, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ref 1. It is the publihser’s website of the book. Why are you tagging it as a ‘self-published source’? Ref 13. Al-press.com is a Business News Agency. Why are you tagging it as a ‘unreliable source’? Ref 14.E books India is a third party online magazine. Why are you tagging it as a ‘unreliable source’? Ref 16. Santa Banta is a popular entertainment portal launched in the year 2000. Why are you tagging it as a ‘unreliable source’? Ref 17 Friday Moviez is a popular third party entertainment website. Why are you tagging it as a ‘unreliable source’? Ref 18 NRI News is a third party website catering to global news about Indians. Why are you tagging it as a ‘unreliable source’? Ref 22 Filmy Filmy is a popular third party entertainment website. Why are you tagging it as a ‘unreliable source’?

Hi GSS-1987 @GSS-1987:

I have removed all your marked tags and related references links. (Although I do believe that some of the references that you tagged as 'unreliable' were not really unreliable). However, both references 13 and 14 - Al-press.com and E-books India are third party interviews of Jeet Gian, why are you tagging that as unreliable? Please do explain this to me. If you are convinced please remove 'unreliable tags' from those references, or you can inform me then I can remove those tags myself.

Thanks. Regards Pri D (talk) 05:51, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Jeet Gian, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 10:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jeet Gian, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 10:14, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jeet Gian, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 10:29, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jim1138: I think Pri D removing the sources as per my explanation above and requesting Pri D to please use your talk page to communicate with other users. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:33, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS-1987: An wp:edit summary explaining the removal should be added irregardless. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:35, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jim1138 and GSS-1987

I am a new editor on Wiki. Yes, it is correct that I am editing as per what GSS said that some content and references were self-generated and or unreliable. Jim1138 , I have noted your concerns and will add comments in edit summary.

Trust this is okay with you both now.

Thanks. Regards Pri D (talk) 10:39, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Jeet Gian does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! GSS (talk|c|em) 10:40, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GSS-1987 and Jim1138 This helps and is noted! Thanks much!

Also please see my comments in the above subject. Have replied to your tags.

Thanks! Regards Pri D (talk) 10:58, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notifications

One generally needs to add the wp:ping and signiture "~~~~" and save both with a single edit. (you can add a message too) If you change the name later, it may not work. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am just a wp:recent changes patroller and am often tasked with trying to understand the purpose of an edit without an edit summary [ES]. Thanks for your comment. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 11:00, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeet Gian for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeet Gian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeet Gian (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 12:45, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Posting to an archived page

I have removed the comments you posted to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeet Gian (2nd nomination) after the discussion had been archived. As it says at the top of the page, no further edits should be made to th page. As a deletion review has been opened, that would be the appropriate place to comment if you think the discussion was closed too early. You find the deletion review through the link at the top of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeet Gian (2nd nomination). --bonadea contributions talk 06:47, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leadstart Publishing (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the refs are about the authors - which should be removed from the draft

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leadstart Publishing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leadstart Publishing (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leadstart Publishing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 18:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Pri D, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DrStrauss talk 18:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Leadstart Publishing concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Leadstart Publishing, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Leadstart Publishing

Hello, Pri D. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Leadstart Publishing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JustaZBguy (talk) 23:39, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]