Jump to content

User talk:Revival1991

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Revival1991! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Cabayi (talk) 09:54, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Cabayi were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Cabayi (talk) 09:51, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Revival1991! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cabayi (talk) 09:51, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Ahmednagar

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Your recent edit to Ahmednagar appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:53, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ahmednagar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:58, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arjayay I have gone through those links and I feel the content I am adding is relevant. I request you to please not delete what I am adding, since it is a church more than 150 year old. Thank You.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Ahmednagar. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Arjayay (talk) 11:11, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As explained in the edit summaries and above, you are making unsourced additions, of a church which does not have an article, All information added to Wikipedia should be verifiable to a reliable source which needs to be cited when the information is added. Please see referencing for beginners for how to so that, and do NOT add any further unsourced edits, or you may be blocked - Arjayay (talk) 11:11, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arjayay On Ahmednagar there are many unsourced additions which does not have an article, but still they are there. There are chances that you may be blocked too from editing wikipedia. Please stop removing what is being added and is relevant. Revival1991 (talk) 11:15, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Other stuff exists is not an acceptable argument on Wikipedia, we know there have been bad edits in the past and are slowly clearing them up, but that is no reason to add more bad edits.
You have been an editor here since 09.07 yesterday, and there are a lot or rules and guidelines to comply with. May I suggest you learn a little more about the place before trying to threaten other editors. - Arjayay (talk) 11:21, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arjayay For your information, this is my another account, I have been wikipedia user for long time, and speaking of threaten other, you first threaten me that I will be blocked. Revival1991 (talk) 11:25, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you using more than one account? As per WP:MULTIACCOUNT you should identify this on the user pages of both accounts.
Moreover, if you are an experienced editor, you should not need to be told about such basic principles as verifiability - Arjayay (talk) 11:34, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arjayay I am not using the previous account anymore and there is no option of deleting the account, it says to create a new one. But why are you asking me about using more than one account? no need to tell me about verifablility it is totally my decision whether I should verify my account or not.. Revival1991 (talk) 11:37, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you had looked at verifiability you would know it is about articles, not accounts. It is a basic principle of Wikipedia, that all information added to Wikipedia articles should be verifiable, a principal which your repeated additions to Ahmednagar fail to meet - Arjayay (talk) 11:42, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arjayay It was a mistake, from your perspective those are not meeting the requirement of venerability. I think you should not be bothered of me adding to Ahmednagar. I am associated with Ahmednagar as well as wikipedia for long time. Henceforth I will not be replying to you since I have no time. Thank You.

June 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 11:07, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cabayi Ok, I don't know why someone is deleting the information I am updating? Revival1991 (talk) 11:09, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Explained in section above - Arjayay (talk) 11:12, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Revival1991! You created a thread called Pandita Ramabai Mukit Mission at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hume Memorial Church, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Pandita Ramabai Mukti Mission, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hume Memorial Church

[edit]

Hello, Revival1991. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hume Memorial Church".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Snowycats (talk) 17:29, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Revival1991. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pandita Ramabai Mukti Mission".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 09:57, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]