User talk:Riku maina

January 2019

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Xavi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:47, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Riku maina, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Riku maina! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Xavi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:10, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Oldham Athletic A.F.C.. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nzd (talk) 13:22, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Riku maina! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Nzd (talk) 13:23, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Denis Law

The edits you are making are not improving the article, as changing the order of events makes it more confusing. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 16:46, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The edits you've made to Michael Carrick and Ryan Giggs have also not been helpful. Please reconsider your edits before you make them in future. – Pee Jay 19:24, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? Please stop making these terrible edits. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 15:45, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Jaap Stam seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:12, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Borkakoty moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Borkakoty, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 14:25, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Ryan Giggs. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:15, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Riku maina,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:28, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Riku maina,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Riku maina,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello, I'm Egghead06. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Rio Ferdinand, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 03:16, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I give reliable source Riku maina (talk) 07:20, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Borkakoty concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Borkakoty, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Borkakoty

Hello, Riku maina. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Borkakoty".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 09:59, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ruud van Nistelrooy, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ruud van Nistelrooy. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Lou Macari, you may be blocked from editing. Egghead06 (talk) 11:43, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello, Riku maina, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Goofdawg (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. – Pee Jay 15:08, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have problems with everything..... Who are you ? Lfc fan or what ? Riku maina (talk) 12:25, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have problems with editors who don't explain their edits properly and refuse to engage with other editors about their conduct going forward. Your attitude is appalling. – Pee Jay 16:51, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Duncan Edwards

If content is cited in the body, it doesn't need citing in the lead as well. Please don't add the citation in the lead again -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:08, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ruud van Nistelrooy (among others)

Can you please recognise that other editors are also involved in this project and have expressed dissatisfaction with your edits. If you think content is missing and needs to be added, by all means add it, but as soon as another editor removes it again, you need to raise a discussion on the article talk page. If you don't know how to do this, there are links to various editing guides at the top of this page, but considering you've been editing on Wikipedia for more than 18 months and haven't ever contributed to a talk page of any kind, I expect you'll ignore this message too. Considering you've been warned for your conduct many times, I expect that if you continue to fail to act collaboratively, you'll be blocked from editing for a significant period. I presume it is only the fact that you do not edit very frequently that has saved you from a block so far, but don't rest on your laurels for too long. – Pee Jay 20:01, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. – Pee Jay 10:21, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. – Pee Jay 15:31, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for slow motion edit warring of unconstructive edits, after multiple requests not to do so. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 13:58, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you not gather from your block that slow-motion edit warring is not a good way to go about things here? Returning from a block and immediately attempting to institute text that was clearly not wanted by other editors is a pretty dumb move. User:Black Kite, any chance of a longer block this time? – Pee Jay 22:31, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. That edit to Ryan Giggs was a pretty poor idea. So this is how it goes - if you continue to add unhelpful text to articles such as led to your previous block, the next one will be indefinite. Black Kite (talk) 00:00, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]