Jump to content

User talk:Rulebrakerz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rulebrakerz, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Rulebrakerz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)


Removing citations[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kaatelal & Sons has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kaatelal & Sons. Thanks! CNMall41 (talk) 19:43, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, re: this edit, per WP:TVPLOT the plot section should not exceed 500 words per season. The section in question is already marked as being too long, so adding to it doesn't make it shorter. If you want to track episode-by-episode developments, then you should create an episode list. See The Boys (2019 TV series) as an example, and please familiarise yourself with MOS:TV so that you understand what our community goals are here. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:19, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaatelal & Sons (January 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hatchens were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hatchens (talk) 03:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Girth Summit. I noticed that you recently removed content from COVID-19 pandemic in Qatar without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GirthSummit (blether) 09:33, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles, as you did with Anahita Bhooshan, unless reliable sources have been provided. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Anahita Bhooshan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Victor Schmidt (talk) 09:29, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anahita Bhooshan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anahita Bhooshan. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

According to the policy WP:FILMOGRAPHY, film names are only to be added in the "Filmography section" when we can get a confirmation through reliable sources that 'principal photography' (filming) has begun. I don't see any accompanying source(s) here. Add entries accompanied by such sources. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:18, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tiger Shroff, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:58, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ganpath: Part I moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Ganpath: Part I, is not suitable as written to remain published as you have not adequately demonstrated that it meets WP:NFF. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Siddharth Nigam. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:27, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ganpath: Part I[edit]

Hello, Rulebrakerz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ganpath: Part I".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:34, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]