Hello, Ryanmccallum, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Rysin3 14:53, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Digital Diva, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DarkSaber2k 15:16, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ryan. I cannot find anything to verify these articles and suspect the worst. Prove me wrong by supplying some references please. —Moondyne 17:45, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry, someone has deleted them as notability was not shown. —Moondyne 03:23, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Digital Diva requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rudget.talk 18:19, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Digital Diva, you will be blocked from editing. Rudget.talk 18:23, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Digital Diva. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rudget.talk 18:24, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from an article, as you did with Digital Diva, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rudget.talk 18:27, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I gather from your comments at Digital Diva that you are getting a little frustrated with the CSD process. I'm sorry there's been a communication breakdown here. The problem with the article isn't that we doubt that the person exists, or that they did in fact release a single. The reason I deleted the article is because it met criteria A7 in our list of Wikipedia: Criteria for speedy deletion - the article did not assert the notability or significance of the subject. You can read more about notability and what it means on Wikipedia at Wikipedia: Notability and the specific criteria for musicians at Wikipedia: Notability (music). I would recommend that you read these two pages before creating articles. Natalie (talk) 18:32, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove the AfD tag for this article (which you have done twice so far[1][2]). When the AfD discussion is concluded, the closing admnistrator will remove the AfD tag. It should stay until then. You can look-up the WP deletion policy at WP:DEL. Also, you need to be aware of the "three revert rule" WP:3RR. In the meantime, you are welcome to participate in the ongoing AfD for this article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chewinggum Airlines. Thanks, Nsk92 (talk) 12:06, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Chewinggum Airlines, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:53, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image copyright problem with Image:CedarcreekSign.JPG[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Thank you for uploading Image:CedarcreekSign.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cedar Creek, Olathe, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Grey Wanderer (talk) 00:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image source problem with Image:Elena dementieva.jpg[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Thanks for uploading Image:Elena dementieva.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:39, 5 October 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:39, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image copyright problem with Image:1326811112 12ec9ffe1f.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:1326811112 12ec9ffe1f.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:59, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not take images from elsewhere and claim them as your own work. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and a failure to do the same will result in you being blocked from editing. J Milburn (talk) 10:34, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Maldives has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 19:05, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Maldives. —SMALLJIM 19:09, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The recent edit you made to Coffee constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. BillyTFried (talk) 19:12, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominated Cedar Creek, Olathe, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cedar Creek, Olathe. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. (ESkog)(Talk) 06:39, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Digital Diva. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rudget.talk 18:24, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. 
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Maldives has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 19:05, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
