User talk:Saagaraludhaati

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Saagaraludhaati, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Adakiko (talk) 11:38, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Credentials[edit]

Please do not use "Dr.", "Professor", "Mr.", "Mrs.", etc. For policy, please see wp:CREDENTIAL and wp:HONORIFIC. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 11:38, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your contributions to article Guntur Kaaram did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you would like to discuss, please use article's talk page. RangersRus (talk) 10:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Check the official page of the Producer’s (Haarika & Hassine Creations) on twitter for the accurate collections of Guntur Kaaram movie. Saagaraludhaati (talk) 13:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source directly from makers is unreliable per WP:RSSELF. Only WP:INDEPENDENT sources are reliable. Falimy (talk) 16:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ohh so source from people who are not the makers of the film are genuine, unbiased and reliable? Saagaraludhaati (talk) 16:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by genuine - really about Guntur Kaaram and not a review of Ahimsa with Ahimsa crossed out and Guntur Kaaram in its place?

Secondary sources may or may not be RS. Everything is biased. Someone may love or hate a particular film and their review is biased in that manner. Some more than others. People focus on different things when writing. Please use sources that are generally considered wp:reliable sources. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 18:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Sarkaru Vaari Paata, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a mistake, just correcting things Saagaraludhaati (talk) 08:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Archer1234. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mahesh Babu filmography, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

Per WP:FILMOGRAPHY: we do not add future film projects until filming has begun as verified by a reliable source.

— Archer1234 (t·c) 14:57, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of highest-grossing Telugu films[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of highest-grossing Telugu films, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Times of India is not a reliable source[edit]

See wp:TOI. Please don't use them. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 11:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know which site is reliable or not ? Saagaraludhaati (talk) 11:20, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:PRS. This list, WP:RSPSS. is of common sources, RS and not. WP:RSPMISSING is a place one can search the archive for discussions of sources. If in doubt, one can start a discussion on wp:Reliable sources/Noticeboard aka wp:RSN. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 11:34, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is a reliable source. Once Check wp:TOI right now and also check :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newspaper_of_record#Examples_of_existing_newspapers

See under Country India ( 🇮🇳 ) : There are only 2 newspapers and one of them is Times of India. Saagaraludhaati (talk) 11:53, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The wp:TOI link states The Times of India is considered to have a reliability between no consensus and generally unreliable. It has a bias in favor of the Indian government and is known to accept payments from persons and entities in exchange for positive coverage.

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Saagaraludhaati! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 01:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RfA[edit]

I noticed you created Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Saagaraludhaati. Please be aware that while there are no requirements for a certain tenure or number of edits to be an administrator, having less than a month on the project and less than 200 edits will mean your RfA is guaranteed to fail if you go live with it. These days, it's not at all uncommon for well qualified candidates to have years of experiences and thousands upon thousands of edits. Please read Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship and Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates before you consider going live with your RfA. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]