User talk:Sathish Kathiravan

Welcome!

Hello, Sathish Kathiravan.

Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm Suneye1, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information:

Introduction to Wikipedia

The five pillars of Wikipedia

Editing tutorial

How to edit a page

Simplified Manual of Style

The basics of Wikicode

How to develop an article

How to create an article

Help pages

What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:

Do be bold

Do assume good faith

Do be civil

Do cite reliable sources

Do maintain a neutral point of view

Don't spam

Don't infringe copyright

Don't add original research

Don't commit vandalism

Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:

Ask a question

or you can:

Get help at the Teahouse

or even:

Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, SUN EYE 1 13:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Lijomol Jose.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Lijomol Jose.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:45, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 18:11, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've been repeatedly changing images just because you don't like it. If this behavior continues then your editing privileges will be revoked. —SpacemanSpiff 18:12, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have no interest in editing collaboratively. Any further disruption and your editing privileges will be revoked. —SpacemanSpiff 06:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Lijomol Jose.jpeg

The page File:Lijomol Jose.jpeg has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appeared to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://hot-actressphotos.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Sivappu-Manjal-Pachai-Movie-Actress-Lijo-Mol-Jose-Hot-Photos-1-350x500.png. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review —SpacemanSpiff 18:14, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aranmanai 3 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aranmanai 3, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Hi Sathish Kathiravan! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 22:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edits, but you continue to mis-mark many of your edits as "minor" when they are not minor. Please follow the guidance at Help:Minor edit. Continued tagging of non-minor edits as "minor" could be considered disruptive behavior and thus potentially subject the editor to sanctions, including loss of editing privileges. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 21:48, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021 (2)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Adutha Saattai, you may be blocked from editing. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 06:10, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Raashi Khanna. Thank you. Ab207 (talk) 14:16, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Lijomol Jose. In addition to adding unsourced WP:BLP content, your recent edits also damaged the Awards table. Please consider discussing your proposed changes at Talk:Lijomol Jose, as any further disruption will result in account restrictions. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:46, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dhanush, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asuran. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tughlaq Durbar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tughlaq Durbar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:31, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Italic for untitled films

Hello Sathish Kathiravan. In edits such as these, please note that italics are only for actual film titles. Untitled films should be written in normal text. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 17:14, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

Re this edit, please note that people are generally referred to by their surname per MOS:SURNAME. Also nationality should be avoided when it can be inferred from the birthplace per WP:INFOBOXNTLY. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 07:10, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Sir Please give me some instructions to create a movie Wikipedia page Sathish Kathiravan (talk) 07:14, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sathish Kathiravan, you may go through Help:Your first article to get an overview of creating new articles. -- Ab207 (talk) 07:18, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Methavi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Methavi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sonofstar (talk) 11:04, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Methavi

The article Methavi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable future film, fails WP:NFF as production wasn't notable. Should be deleted or moved to draftspace until release and then notability can be determined.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:14, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Methavi. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. -- DaxServer (talk) 12:34, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reverted two of your recent edits to Amritha Aiyer because I can't find the citations that support your claim and the removal of information is basically unexplained in the edit summary. I might be wrong with this edit undo, if I'm wrong, please contact me with my talk page. -Justiyaya (talk) 13:40, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please add citations to your recent edits in Amritha Aiyer, thanks. -Justiyaya (talk) 13:43, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding your edits without removing other information without explanation. The only problem I have with your edit not is the part where you claim "Amritha Aiyer is an Indian actress who predominantly appears in Tamil and Telugu films." when the actress in the article mostly appears in Tamil films (see the graph in the article) therefor I'm removing the Telugu films part. Thanks for your previous edit, I appreciate your contributions :) Justiyaya (talk) 13:55, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! SUN EYE 1 17:33, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Methavi. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. -- DaxServer (talk) 08:36, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Pooja Hedge. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please note that the people should generally be referred by their last name per MOS:SURNAME. Diff: [1], [2]. Compelled to issue a warning as its previously explained to you. Ab207 (talk) 17:39, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Methavi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Methavi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Methavi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Donaldd23 (talk) 15:26, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Hi...can you please upload the image of Vani Bhojan in Wikimedia commons. She have three images but not nice. So kindly upload. Please my humble request to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4072:6E92:F47:4E86:2890:8FE1:7636 (talk) 17:39, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please give me instructions to upload images with copyrights and licence.I will do it Sathish Kathiravan (talk) 17:55, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[3] [4] [5] see the link.

Can you create an article for Malaysia to Amnesia movie. Please

About Raashi's wikipage

Mr. Sathish Kathiravan, Some of your edits on this page is reverted because of various reasons.. but you seemingly keep repeating those same edits even after explaining why few edits of yours are reverted. I request you to take note of the other editor's point of view on his take of reverting your edits..

Those edits can be changed because they are unsourced and erroneous.. so please don't repeat those edits which were reverted because there are some editors who might report you for possible vandalism of the wikipage. Thank You. ❤ Gautham offl (talk) 12:03, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your compliments.I will do good edits with citations. Sathish Kathiravan (talk) 07:09, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know those awards which you keep adding on Raashi's wikipage.. For your information, the spelling is "Techofes" and not "Techofos" which is awarded by college of Guindy.

6 months before I added those awards like you, but a senior editor explained me that not all awards are supposed to be added in the list.. only famous awards like National Awards or Filmfare etc are added..

So please stop adding those 2 awards.. There aren't supposed to be added Gautham offl (talk) 21:16, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And coming to that infobox issue, for 7 awards and 2 nominations.. infobox isn't necessary..

infact there are some wikipage which doesn't have infobox for more than 10 awards and nominations where the box is supposed to be added..

So it is not necessary to add infobox for very few awards.. Gautham offl (talk) 21:19, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sathish, she didn't act in Venghai movie, Actually during that time she was in college and she made her film debut in 2013.

Please don't repeatedly add this wrong information. Else you would be added in the possible list of Vandalism by wikipedia editors..

Thank You. Gautham offl (talk) 05:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Methavi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Methavi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021 (2)

In edits such as these, its unclear why you are removing full names without any explanation. Full character names, if known, would be included. For example, we mention that Robert Downey Jr played Tony Stark in the MCU, not just Tony. -- Ab207 (talk) 14:59, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sathish Kathiravan. Please note that this is unwarranted. When your edit is reverted, your next action should be discussing it with other editors per WP:BRD. If you keep restoring your preferred version without discussion, it amounts to edit warring for which you may be blocked from further editing. -- Ab207 (talk) 06:00, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add words like "positive reviews" and "instant hit" as you did in this edit without sources. See WP:V and WP:CITE. -- Ab207 (talk) 12:26, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re this edit. Do not add future films without sources that confirm filming began. See WP:CRYSTAL and WP:FILMOGRAPHY. -- Ab207 (talk) 16:56, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hey there! You should consider things done by other users as well. Once your edit is reversed, it should be discussed before adding it again. You should see the hatline Indian name at Rashmika Mandanna which says clearly to refer to the persons with their names rather than patronymic one. Hope it's conveyed. NinadMysuru (talk) 07:01, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kombu Vatcha Singamda moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kombu Vatcha Singamda, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 19:36, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Raashi's wikipage

Hey Sathish Kathiravan, please try to understand what other wikipedia editors wants to convey with their edits. Just don't add your content repeatedly inspite of your content getting reverted back.

you are not trying to understand what your editor colleagues say. This is not good from your side. You can't add content as you like by just having a wikipedia account. If you keep repeating your mistakes, you would be permanently debarred.

Thank you. Gautham offl (talk) 10:37, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aranmanai 3 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aranmanai 3, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GermanKity (talk) 09:53, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sathish Kathiravan. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:10, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 43933

UTRS appeal #43933 is now closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:52, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sathish Kathiravan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- DaxServer (talk) 12:04, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sathish Kathiravan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- DaxServer (talk) 14:15, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sathish Kathiravan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- DaxServer (talk) 14:28, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sathish Kathiravan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- DaxServer (talk) 19:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sathish Kathiravan. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:14, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sathish Kathiravan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- DaxServer (talk) 17:49, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sathish Kathiravan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- DaxServer (talk) 18:58, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sathish Kathiravan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- DaxServer (talk) 10:29, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sathish Kathiravan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- DaxServer (talk) 16:42, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sathish Kathiravan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- DaxServer (talk) 08:43, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Paid editing from User:Sathish Kathiravan and socks. Thank you. -- DaxServer (talk) 13:32, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Aranmanai 3

Hello, Sathish Kathiravan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aranmanai 3, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aranmanai 3

Hello, Sathish Kathiravan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aranmanai 3".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Methavi

Hello, Sathish Kathiravan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Methavi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:03, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]