User talk:Saudiarabia342

December 2023[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Saudia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:51, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Saudia, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Saudia was changed by Saudiarabia342 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916664 on 2023-12-02T16:02:49+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Saudia, you may be blocked from editing. Splatterxl – talk 16:11, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All content requires verification by reliable source references. "Rumored" not allowed. Also, do not tag your edits as minor unless minor (See WP:MINOR) and provide better Edit summaries. David notMD (talk) 20:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at El Al Flight 1862. Jasper Deng (talk) 10:03, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at El Al Flight 1862. If you are interested to know how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements already in Wikipedia – and, if possible, correct them. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with sanctions, which could include a block from editing. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 10:04, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 10:37, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rashed Abdulla Malalla Obaid Suroor (January 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rashed Abdulla Malalla Obaid Suroor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:49, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saudiarabia342! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:49, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Inlang[edit]

I've moved your article to draft space, because it is not yet ready for main space — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do not create articles in mainspace or submit drafts to AfC unless all the content is referenced. Behaviors like this can get your account indefinitely blocked. David notMD (talk) 22:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rashed Abdulla Malalla Obaid Suroor[edit]

The article Rashed Abdulla Malalla Obaid Suroor has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 13:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rashed Abdulla Malalla Obaid Suroor[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rashed Abdulla Malalla Obaid Suroor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Qcne (talk) 16:22, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rashed Abdulla Malalla Obaid Suroor[edit]

Hello, Saudiarabia342. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rashed Abdulla Malalla Obaid Suroor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]