Jump to content

User talk:SchaiDog

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Your edit to Gideon Mace

[edit]

Message posted on Friday, June 8, 2007

[edit]

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Gideon Mace. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (Copied verbatim from The All New Official Handbook of the Marvel Universe A-Z #6 (published June 2006) in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Gideon Mace with a link to where we can find that note;
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Gideon Mace with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Gideon Mace saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

84.9.77.27 11:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC) (version with headers) on the Talk page of the author. Hello, SchaiDog, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:[reply]

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Adambiswanger1 03:22, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation links/piping

[edit]

I know it's really annoying when someone picks out something you've done and tells you to do it another way so I apologise in advance for what follows. I just noticed your edits to MLB All-Time Triples List and that your "Jim O'Rourke" link pointed to this disambiguation page rather than directly to the baseball player. Though it's a really irritating procedure, it's always best to check if all your links are going to the right place. For example Jim O'Rourke (baseball player) rather than Jim O'Rourke or Jim O'Rourke (musician). If you want to link to Jim O'Rourke (baseball player) without directly showing it in the text like this Jim O'Rourke, all you have to do is add a vertical line "|" (press shift+\) between what you want to link to (first) and what you want the link to say. This is called piping and would look like this: [[Jim O'Rourke (baseball player)|Jim O'Rourke]]. You probably know all this already as you've done hundreds of good edits so sorry if you did and I'm being patronising or such. Thanks. Jellypuzzle | Talk 09:01, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits for List of Star Trek planets

[edit]

Please stop adding links to the planet names on this page. It is highly unlikely that every planet will get a dedicated article about them since most are insignifigant and appeared once in an episode or merely given a brief mention in dialog. Anything added to them will be purely fan conjecture since no offical canon info is available. They will be deleted as worthless entries and fancruft. Certian major planets like Bajor do have their own entries because they played a vital role in the series and there is a lot of canon info about them. Likewise, a lengthy entry about such planets is unecessary because they have their own article with more information. Data on a planet should be confined into a single sentence otherwise it will be deleted as being worthless fluff. Everytime you make a dead link it gets filed under "Wanted pages" which fills up everyday and causes controversy because a lot on nonsense articles are asked to be made. Admins may come in and delete everything because they feel it's a waste of bandwidth here. Again linking planets will cause problems, not to mention annoy the hell out of me because I have to clean up useless edits all day. Cyberia23 00:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Will you lay off this page! You're still adding total fancruft BS to it and I suggest you stop writing long winded descriptions that have no canon references to support anything you've added. I'm working backwards of Z - A to overhaul the page and clean it up and all your doing is adding nonsense and making cleanup harder. Plus you deleted all the references for the episodes where the planets came from. Thanks, now I have to redo it all over again. Cyberia23 07:20, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Morrie Martin

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Morrie Martin, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.baseballhalloffame.org/library/columns/gs_041117.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:Morrie Martin. Then you should do one of the following:

  • Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:Morrie Martin where we can find that note; or
  • Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Metros232 13:14, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Jays AL League Leaders

[edit]

I recently came upon your work on the Jays AL League Leaders page I noticed you did some research and listed some of the their American League leading accomplishments. Possibly you could add the values for these league leaders. (As in George Bell 48 HRs in 1987, or whichever the stat maybe). I think it would add some extra valuable information to the page. Wxthewx99 00:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite sources

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Steve Renko, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:12, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

baseball player articles

[edit]

Hi - thank you for your contributions to baseball player articles. However, I think you could improve quality of the articles that you create if you could follow the form for established baseball player articles. For example, Eddie Miller (baseball infielder) does not read like an encyclopedia article. A good place to start is Wikipedia:WikiProject_Baseball_players. Look at some of the pages users on that project have worked on for a guide as to how articles should be written. Please let me know if you have any questions. - Mattingly23 02:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please, please, please add your sources to your articles. I'm thrilled that you are creating so many, but it would help tremendously if you'd add a link to your source. If you have any questions on how to do it, I'll be glad to help. Kathy A. 16:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Milwaukee Brewers/Players of note

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Milwaukee Brewers/Players of note, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted under Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. If you can indicate how Milwaukee Brewers/Players of note is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}}, and also put a note on Talk:Milwaukee Brewers/Players of note saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions. SUBWAYguy 06:02, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Miami Dolphins Coaching Staff

[edit]

Mike Mularkey is no longer the team's offensive coordinator. He will remain with the team, but likely will not have that title. You can know this because the team is currently interviewing candidates for their offensive coordinator position. Mularkey will probably end up tight ends coach.

MLB All-Time Hit Batsmen List

[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on MLB All-Time Hit Batsmen List, by Tecmobowl (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because MLB All-Time Hit Batsmen List fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

It's not properly formatted and the information is extremely trivial. There is little use for this here and the information is not notable


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting MLB All-Time Hit Batsmen List, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate MLB All-Time Hit Batsmen List itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 07:05, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a suggestion...

[edit]

Hello,

Please don't capitalise the types of statistics, as they are not proper nouns. Instead of At-Bat, Run, Strike Out, type at-bat, run, strike out, et cetera. It makes the page look a whole lot neater.

Also, less statistics is sometimes better.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexsautographs (talk • contribs)

Edits to player articles in the NFLactive infobox

[edit]

I noticed you have made a number of changes that incorporate "statistal rankings" into the career highlights section. I have reverted them as I'm not sure they really enhance the quality of information. Saying a player ranks 425th all-time in a stat category doesn't seem like it qualifies. Most often, it "seems" as if the consensus is only to use all-time rankings in "important" categories where the person placed in the top 10. I don't know that a hard discussion has been had on this - but I have marked this for watching in case you have any thoughts. Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat  19:22, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the info about Felix Jones removed from the Jerry Eckwood article? His yards per carry checked out against the Razorback Press Guide.

D-free —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dlfreem (talk • contribs) 00:55, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind about the previous message 7.62 is more than 7.58. Duh!! D-free —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dlfreem (talk • contribs) 05:55, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

xxxx in baseball articles

[edit]

Stop adding minor milestones of players, like 100 career homerun. Jaranda wat's sup 19:16, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please reconsider adding the numerous "three home run" games to the individual baseball season events pages. These events are far from unique. There may be some games that are important and noteworthy, such as a player who has done this on five or six occasions. Those are noteowrthy, and should be included, with a notation such as "this is the third of six occasions that this player did this ...."

You could certainly include that information on individual player pages, or in an appropriate team history section.

The same could be said for the "100th, 200th, etc" home runs. Those may be notable fpr players who hit 500 or more home runs, but would generally not be notable for players who don't reach those plateaus.

Also, please watch your grammar. You have been entering events such as: "Sammy Sosa hits 100th home run" It is more in the style of the written page that already exists to say "Sammy Sosa hit his 100th home run". Further, it is often the case that the word "the" precedes the name of a team. I have had to correct many entries for this. I don't want this to sound judgemental or such. I wish you the best of luck as it looks like we share a passion for a great game.TeganX7 01:44, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Highlights

[edit]

Please dont overfill the infobox with unncessary things like 80th on the all time batters faced list or something like that, it should only be there if there in the top 10 or so of that stat--Yankees10 14:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

for the baseball players infoboxes, when a player leads the league in something please write it like this, for example if they lead the NL in saves in 1966 with 25 write: Led NL in saves in 1966 with 25, just to keep it consisitant with other infoboxes, thanks--Yankees10 03:09, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You still arent doing it

[edit]

Can you please write the highlights like this: Led NL in games pitched in 1986 with 80, you write it like this: Led the AL in Games Pitched in 1986 (80), please keep it consistant with others--Yankees10 (talk) 17:07, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


H'ylthri

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article H'ylthri, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of H'ylthri. Merkinsmum 00:29, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 8 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dick Woodson, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--JayHenry (talk) 00:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Afraid of Ed Hochuli

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Afraid of Ed Hochuli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Cadwaladr (talk) 21:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1861 in the American Old West

[edit]

A tag has been placed on 1861 in the American Old West requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. NPeeerbvsesz (Push) 18:05, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1907 in the American Old West

[edit]

The article 1907 in the American Old West has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Merge this into [1907]], no reason for a separate article centering on the American Old West.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. A little insignificant Giving thanks to all that is me 16:13, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia.
I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD. You may want to carefully review Wikipedia:Your first article.
For basic information on beginning to write an article see User:Dloh/new.
For more general information about the deletion process, please see User:Dlohcierekim/deletion
If you believe the subject does in fact meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information, please contact me on my talk page.
If you wish to make test edits or work on the article before creating it, you can create a test page at User:SchaiDog/test and consider using the Article Wizard.
Cheers, and happy editing. Dlohcierekim 15:27, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, 1843 in the American Old West, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&id=4343. As a copyright violation, 1843 in the American Old West appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. 1843 in the American Old West has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. This article also has virtually no content, being a very brief account of one incident, and cannot reasonably be regarded as covering the subject indicated in its title. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:09, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:dloh/d}}

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, 1883 in the American Old West, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&id=4341. As a copyright violation, 1883 in the American Old West appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. 1883 in the American Old West has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:17, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, 1907 in the American Old West, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&id=4342. As a copyright violation, 1907 in the American Old West appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. 1907 in the American Old West has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:17, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, 1867 in the American Old West, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&id=4335. As a copyright violation, 1867 in the American Old West appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. 1867 in the American Old West has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:17, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, 1875 in the American Old West, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&id=4332. As a copyright violation, 1875 in the American Old West appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. 1875 in the American Old West has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:17, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1882 in the American Old West

[edit]

The article 1882 in the American Old West has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content has been merged into 1882; no reason for a separate article for one incident in the American Old West.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:23, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, 1856 in the American Old West, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://disc.yourwebapps.com/discussion.cgi?disc=239395;article=3111;title=OLD%20WEST%20ROGUES. As a copyright violation, 1856 in the American Old West appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. 1856 in the American Old West has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:25, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Timeline of the American Revolutionary War, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&id=51307, http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&id=51332, http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&id=51311, http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&id=51326, http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&id=51266, etc etc etc.... As a copyright violation, Timeline of the American Revolutionary War appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Timeline of the American Revolutionary War has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:41, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

You have been creating large numbers of articles in which you have pasted text taken from www.history.com and elsewhere. It is usually not acceptable to copy information from web sites like this: you must always check that the web site allows such use. In the case of www.history.com each page bears the note © 1996-2008, A&E Television Networks. All rights reserved, clearly indicating that this is not acceptable. Since you have previously been warned more than once about posting copyright information, the first time on 4 September 2006, perhaps you might have been aware of the risk, but I hope you will be more careful from now on. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1860 in the American Old West

[edit]

A tag has been placed on 1860 in the American Old West requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. noq (talk) 20:16, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello SchaiDog! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 10 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Eddie Fisher (baseball) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Dave Wickersham - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Craig McMurtry - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Dickie Noles - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Dave Robisch - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Joe Astroth - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. Tony Scott (baseball) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  8. Joe Arenas - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  9. Wade Blasingame - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  10. Sammy Esposito - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio in Mike Clark (football coach)

[edit]

Your addition to Mike Clark (football coach) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 19:36, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tom Sherman (American football)

[edit]

The article Tom Sherman (American football) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced biography.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guy (Help!) 19:43, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:34, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, SchaiDog. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Darren Comeaux

[edit]

The article Darren Comeaux has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Atlantic306 (talk) 16:56, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kraven the Hunter (Alyosha Kravinoff) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kraven the Hunter (Alyosha Kravinoff) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kraven the Hunter (Alyosha Kravinoff) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TTN (talk) 13:00, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SchaiDog&oldid=1144323106"